Transcriptome analysis of biotic and abiotic stress mediated by the suction of brown planthopper in two rice cultivars

被引:1
|
作者
Li, Changyan [1 ]
Zha, Wenjun [1 ]
Wang, Jianyu [1 ]
Wu, Yan [1 ]
Shi, Shaojie [1 ]
Wang, Huiying [1 ]
Li, Sanhe [1 ]
Wu, Bian [1 ]
Liu, Kai [1 ]
Chen, Junxiao [1 ]
Xu, Huashan [1 ]
Li, Peide [1 ]
Chen, Zhijun [1 ]
Liu, Kai [1 ]
Yang, Guocai [1 ]
Wan, Bingliang [1 ]
Zhou, Lei [1 ,2 ]
You, Aiqing [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hubei Acad Agr Sci, Hubei Key Lab Food Crop Germplasm & Genet Improve, Food Crops Inst, Wuhan 430064, Peoples R China
[2] Hubei Hongshan Lab, Wuhan 430070, Peoples R China
来源
PLANT STRESS | 2024年 / 11卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Brown planthopper (nilaparvata lugens); Rice (oryza sativa); Physical injury; Resistance gene; Transcriptome; NILAPARVATA-LUGENS; DEFENSE RESPONSE; RESISTANCE GENE; BROAD-SPECTRUM; IDENTIFICATION; HERBIVORE;
D O I
10.1016/j.stress.2024.100380
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
RH (Rathu Heenati), an indica rice cultivar from Sri Lanka, is highly resistant to several different biotypes of brown planthopper (Nilaparvata lugens Stal, BPH). In contrast, another indica rice cultivar, TN1 (Taichung Native 1), is highly susceptible to all biotypes of BPH. To reveal the molecular biological mechanism of biotic and abiotic stress mediated by BPH suction in two rice cultivars, RH and TN1, the genome-wide gene expressional profiling of these two rice varieties at 6 h after BPH infestation and needle puncturing was conducted by performing transcriptome analysis. In total, six samples (T6C, T6N, T6B, R6C, R6N, and R6B) were collected after performing different treatments for this expressional analysis. The results provide important information for the further isolation of BPH-resistance genes from RH as well as research on the mechanism of BPH resistance in RH. The transcriptome results revealed that TN1 (a BPH-susceptible rice variety) and RH (a BPH-resistant rice variety) harbor different pathways that respond to the physical injury of acupuncture and BPH infestation. The susceptible variety TN1 is more sensitive to the physical damage caused by acupuncture, whereas in the resistant variety RH, the response to insect damage is more rapid and direct. By comparing the gene changes of various plant hormones between the two varieties under different stresses, it was found that, in addition to the traditional SA and ET pathways related to the feeding induction of piercing-sucking pests, the expression patterns of JAZrelated genes in the JA signaling pathway also changed under two stresses (acupuncture induction and brown planthopper feeding induction), while the IAA hormone pathway-related genes in the susceptible variety TN1 also changed significantly after brown planthopper feeding. Furthermore, the results of this study help us to understand the biological process of rice responses to BPH and provide a promising direction to identify BPHresistance-related genes in RH.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] VIRULENCE TO RICE CULTIVARS AND SELECTION FOR VIRULENCE IN POPULATIONS OF THE BROWN PLANTHOPPER NILAPARVATA-LUGENS
    CLARIDGE, MF
    DENHOLLANDER, J
    ENTOMOLOGIA EXPERIMENTALIS ET APPLICATA, 1982, 32 (03) : 213 - 221
  • [32] Mitigation of Abiotic and Biotic Stress Using Plant Growth Regulators in Rice
    Ajaykumar, Ramasamy
    Krishnasamy, Subramani Murali
    Dhanapal, Rajendran
    Ramkumar, Govindaraju
    Megaladevi, Pachamuthu
    Manjubala, Muthusamy
    Chandrasekaran, Perumal
    Pradeeshkumar, Thangavel
    Navinkumar, Chinnaraju
    Harishankar, Kanthaswamy
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2023, 13 (09):
  • [33] Comparative Transcriptome Analysis of Two Olive Cultivars in Response to NaCl Stress
    Kalaitzis, P.
    Bazakos, C.
    Manioudaki, M.
    II INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON HORTICULTURE IN EUROPE, 2015, 1099 : 801 - 806
  • [34] Two whitebacked planthopper resistance genes in rice share the same loci with those for brown planthopper resistance
    G X Tan
    Q M Weng
    X Ren
    Z Huang
    L L Zhu
    G C He
    Heredity, 2004, 92 : 212 - 217
  • [35] Two whitebacked planthopper resistance genes in rice share the same loci with those for brown planthopper resistance
    Tan, GX
    Weng, QM
    Ren, X
    Huang, Z
    Zhu, LL
    He, GC
    HEREDITY, 2004, 92 (03) : 212 - 217
  • [36] RNA-Seq based global transcriptome analysis of rice unravels the key players associated with brown planthopper resistance
    Satturu, Vanisri
    Kudapa, Hima Bindu
    Muthuramalingam, Pandiyan
    Nadimpalli, Rama Gopal Varma
    Vattikuti, Jhansi Lakshmi
    Anjali, C.
    Satish, Lakkakula
    Ramesh, Manikandan
    Mulinti, Sreedhar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL MACROMOLECULES, 2021, 191 : 118 - 128
  • [37] MANAGEMENT OF THE BROWN PLANTHOPPER, NILAPARVATA-LUGENS (HOMOPTERA, DELPHACIDAE), WITH EARLY MATURING RICE CULTIVARS
    HEINRICHS, EA
    AQUINO, GB
    VALENCIA, SL
    DESAGUN, S
    ARCEO, MB
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENTOMOLOGY, 1986, 15 (01) : 93 - 95
  • [38] Organ-specific transcriptome response of the small brown planthopper toward rice stripe virus
    Zhao, Wan
    Lu, Lixia
    Yang, Pengcheng
    Cui, Na
    Kang, Le
    Cui, Feng
    INSECT BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2016, 70 : 60 - 72
  • [39] Comprehensive Analysis Suggests Overlapping Expression of Rice ONAC Transcription Factors in Abiotic and Biotic Stress Responses
    Sun, Lijun
    Huang, Lei
    Hong, Yongbo
    Zhang, Huijuan
    Song, Fengming
    Li, Dayong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2015, 16 (02) : 4306 - 4326
  • [40] Transcriptome analysis of two buffalograss cultivars
    Michael Wachholtz
    Tiffany Heng-Moss
    Paul Twigg
    Lisa Baird
    Guoqing Lu
    Keenan Amundsen
    BMC Genomics, 14