Does environmental regulation improve firms' export product quality? Empirical evidence based on China's key regional air pollution and control policy

被引:9
作者
Jiang, Yan [1 ]
Tang, Long [2 ,3 ]
Huang, Cui [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Publ Affairs, Hangzhou 310058, Peoples R China
[2] Jiaxing Univ, Sch Econ, Jiaxing 314001, Peoples R China
[3] Jiaxing Univ, Inst China Common Prosper Res, Jiaxing 314001, Peoples R China
[4] 866 Yuhangtang Rd, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Environmental regulation; Export product quality; Resource reallocation effect; Porter effect; FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT; TRADE LIBERALIZATION; INNOVATION; COMPETITIVENESS; PRICES; IMPACT; PERFORMANCE; GOVERNMENT; EMISSIONS; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139822
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Promoting high-quality export development is a crucial strategic decision for economic transformation and upgrading. However, the effects and potential mechanisms of environmental regulations on firms' export product quality remain a subject of debate. This study investigates the impact of environmental regulations on firms' export product quality by analyzing firm-level data from 2000 to 2013. The study employs a quasi-natural experiment that focuses on the Key Air Pollution Control Zone (KRAPC) implemented by the central government in 2010. We found that environmental regulations, as represented by this policy, significantly enhance the firms' export product quality. At the macro perspective, this improvement primarily stems from the reduction of air pollution in the designated areas, and advancements in regional innovation and human capital. At the micro perspective, the main mechanisms are the reallocation of resources and the "Porter effect". The former mainly involves reducing the production scale or even withdrawing high-energy-consuming and high-polluting enterprises, resulting in improved export product quality among new market entrants. The latter is manifested through enhanced enterprise innovation abilities, increased productivity, and reduced production costs. Furthermore, the impact of the KRAPC policy on firms' export product quality varies depending on factors such as ownership, size, and technology intensity. In addition, the policy has positive spillover effects on neighboring non-key areas. Therefore, this study supports the government in formulating a scientific environmental policy that promotes a mutually beneficial relationship between economic growth and environmental protection.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Does the central environmental inspection effectively improve air pollution?-An empirical study of 290 prefecture-level cities in China [J].
Wang, Wenwen ;
Sun, Xinran ;
Zhang, Ming .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 286
[32]   Does place-based green policy improve air pollution? Evidence from China’s National Eco-Industrial Demonstration Park Policy [J].
Shengrui Li ;
Leyi Chen ;
Pingguo Xu .
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024, 31 :43-72
[33]   Environmental Regulation and Chronic Conditions: Evidence from China's Air Pollution Prevention and Control Action Plan [J].
Zhao, Yang ;
Kim, Beomsoo .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (19)
[34]   Does the regional environmental supervision policy halt pollution? Evidence from the exit of high-pollution enterprises in China [J].
Sun, Chuanwang ;
Xu, Zhehong .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2025, 112
[35]   Top-down environmental quality regulation and boundary pollution control: Evidence in boundary towns of China [J].
Lin, Weifen ;
Du, Longzheng .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2025, 194
[36]   Environmental regulation, economic development and air pollution in the cities of China: Spatial econometric analysis based on policy scoring and satellite data [J].
Zhang, Guoxing ;
Jia, Yuqi ;
Su, Bin ;
Xiu, Jing .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 328
[37]   Does environmental regulation pressure induce the green innovation of enterprises? Quasi-natural experiment of China's air pollution prevention and control action plan [J].
Liu, Sheng ;
Xu, Haoteng ;
Chen, Xiuying .
TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2024, 36 (12) :4471-4486
[38]   Does freight structure transformation improve air quality?- Evidence from China's "shifting freight from truck to rail" policy [J].
Liang, Yuchao ;
Zheng, Guohua ;
Wang, Jinuo ;
Pang, Jun .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 132
[39]   Environmental regulation and the growth of the total-factor carbon productivity of China's industries: Evidence from the implementation of action plan of air pollution prevention and control [J].
Zhou, Lin ;
Tang, Lizhi .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 296
[40]   Does Environmental Regulation Promote Eco-Innovation Performance of Manufacturing Firms?-Empirical Evidence from China [J].
Wang, Jieqiong ;
Hu, Shichao ;
Zhang, Ziyi .
ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (06)