Does environmental regulation improve firms' export product quality? Empirical evidence based on China's key regional air pollution and control policy

被引:7
作者
Jiang, Yan [1 ]
Tang, Long [2 ,3 ]
Huang, Cui [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Publ Affairs, Hangzhou 310058, Peoples R China
[2] Jiaxing Univ, Sch Econ, Jiaxing 314001, Peoples R China
[3] Jiaxing Univ, Inst China Common Prosper Res, Jiaxing 314001, Peoples R China
[4] 866 Yuhangtang Rd, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Environmental regulation; Export product quality; Resource reallocation effect; Porter effect; FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT; TRADE LIBERALIZATION; INNOVATION; COMPETITIVENESS; PRICES; IMPACT; PERFORMANCE; GOVERNMENT; EMISSIONS; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139822
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Promoting high-quality export development is a crucial strategic decision for economic transformation and upgrading. However, the effects and potential mechanisms of environmental regulations on firms' export product quality remain a subject of debate. This study investigates the impact of environmental regulations on firms' export product quality by analyzing firm-level data from 2000 to 2013. The study employs a quasi-natural experiment that focuses on the Key Air Pollution Control Zone (KRAPC) implemented by the central government in 2010. We found that environmental regulations, as represented by this policy, significantly enhance the firms' export product quality. At the macro perspective, this improvement primarily stems from the reduction of air pollution in the designated areas, and advancements in regional innovation and human capital. At the micro perspective, the main mechanisms are the reallocation of resources and the "Porter effect". The former mainly involves reducing the production scale or even withdrawing high-energy-consuming and high-polluting enterprises, resulting in improved export product quality among new market entrants. The latter is manifested through enhanced enterprise innovation abilities, increased productivity, and reduced production costs. Furthermore, the impact of the KRAPC policy on firms' export product quality varies depending on factors such as ownership, size, and technology intensity. In addition, the policy has positive spillover effects on neighboring non-key areas. Therefore, this study supports the government in formulating a scientific environmental policy that promotes a mutually beneficial relationship between economic growth and environmental protection.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   How does environmental regulation influence China's carbon productivity? An empirical analysis based on the spatial spillover effect [J].
Hu, Wei ;
Wang, Di .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 257 (257)
[22]   TAX COMPETITION, ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION AND AIR POLLUTION - EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM 278 CITIES IN CHINA [J].
Shangguan, Xuming ;
Wang, Xingyuan .
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2021, 20 (04) :635-644
[23]   Impacts of Environmental Regulation on Water Pollution Enterprises in China: An Empirical Study Based on "Two Control Zones" Policy [J].
Tian X. ;
Chen S. ;
Xu J. .
Beijing Daxue Xuebao (Ziran Kexue Ban)/Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 2019, 55 (05) :941-950
[24]   Does TQM improve employees' quality of work life? Empirical evidence from Malaysia's manufacturing firms [J].
Ooi, Keng-Boon ;
Lee, Voon-Hsien ;
Chong, Alain Yee-Loong ;
Lin, Binshan .
PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2013, 24 (01) :72-89
[25]   How does environmental regulation affect the double dividend for energy firms? Evidence from China's EPT policy [J].
Deng, Youyi ;
Dong, Kangyin ;
Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad ;
Xue, Jinjun .
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2023, 79 :807-820
[26]   Environmental regulation and mental well-being: Evidence from China's air pollution prevention and control action plan [J].
Wang, Yuze ;
Zhang, Zidi ;
Hao, Zhuang ;
Eriksson, Tor .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2025, 365
[27]   Environmental Regulation, Technological Innovation, and Export Competitiveness: An Empirical Study Based on China's Manufacturing Industry [J].
Liu, Jiayue ;
Xie, Jing .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (04)
[28]   THE IMPACT OF HETEROGENEOUS ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION ON FIRMS' GREEN INNOVATION: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM CHINA'S MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY [J].
Zhao, Shuliang ;
Zhang, Rui ;
Fan, Qi .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2024, 28 (03N04)
[29]   Is the key-treatment-in-key-areas approach in air pollution control policy effective? Evidence from the action plan for air pollution prevention and control in China [J].
Wang, Wenhuan ;
Zhao, Congyu ;
Dong, Cong ;
Yu, Huajun ;
Wang, Yutao ;
Yang, Xiaoguang .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 843
[30]   Does the central environmental inspection effectively improve air pollution?-An empirical study of 290 prefecture-level cities in China [J].
Wang, Wenwen ;
Sun, Xinran ;
Zhang, Ming .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 286