Lenvatinib plus Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors versus Lenvatinib monotherapy as treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis

Lenvatinib, an FDA-approved first-line oral multi-kinase inhibitor for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC), has demonstrated promise for treatment. Nevertheless, findings from the Leap-002 study suggest that the addition of anti-vascular drugs to Lenvatinib may not yield significant improvements in survival rate. This meta -analysis aims to comprehensively assess the effectiveness of Lenvatinib, both as a standalone treatment and in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), in managing advanced aHCC patients. We retrieved relevant studies published up to March 1, 2023, from databases such as PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase. Subsequently, we conducted an analysis using REVMAN 5.3 and Stata MP 14.0 software, following quality assessment and data extraction procedures. A random effects model was employed to calculate the risk ra-tio (HR) using a 95% confidence interval (CI). The initial literature search yielded 921 results. However, after multiple rounds of exclusion and the removal of unrelated studies, 26 papers met the screening criteria. After a thorough ex-amination of the full texts, we found that 8 studies met the analysis criteria. The combination of Lenvatinib with ICIs demonstrated significant improvement in overall survival (OS) (HR=1.53, 95% CI: 1.34-1.74; P<0.001) and progres-sion-free survival (PFS) (HR=1.51, 95% CI: 1.34-1.72; P<0.001). Furthermore, subgroup analysis, categorized by the duration of follow-up, revealed that for the 3-year combined OS (HR=2.21, 95% CI: 1.79-2.73; Z=7.40, P<0.05), the combination therapy significantly outperformed monotherapy, leading to a 2.21-fold increase in OS for patients during the 3-year follow-up period. Nevertheless, for non-3-year combinations (HR=1.206, 95% CI: 1.020-1.425; Z=2.19, P<0.05), there was merely a 1.206-fold increase in effectiveness compared to single therapy for follow-ups of both longer and shorter durations. This might be attributed to the insufficient representation of HBV-related aHCC cases and the Asian population in the study, along with the increased availability of second-line treatment options for advanced cancer, which can influence the observed effectiveness of immunotherapy.