A pre-processing tool to increase performance of deep learning-based CAD in digital breast Tomosynthesis

被引:2
作者
Esposito, Daniele [1 ]
Paterno, Gianfranco [2 ]
Ricciardi, Roberta [3 ]
Sarno, Antonio [1 ,4 ]
Russo, Paolo [1 ,4 ]
Mettivier, Giovanni [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Ist Nazl Fis Nucleare INFN Sez Napoli, Naples, Italy
[2] Ist Nazl Fis Nucleare INFN Sez Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
[3] Univ Naples Federico II, Postgrad Sch Med Phys, Naples, Italy
[4] Univ Naples Federico II, Dept Phys Ettore Pancini, Naples, Italy
关键词
Breast cancer; Digital breast tomosynthesis; Convolutional neural networks; Deep learning; Computed aided diagnosis; Image process; PECTORAL MUSCLE SEGMENTATION; IMAGES;
D O I
10.1007/s12553-023-00804-9
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
PurposeWorldwide, female breast cancer is the fifth leading cause of death. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) is increasingly involved in the routine diagnosis of breast cancer, providing quasi-three-dimensional reconstruction of the breast. DBT image analysis is time-consuming and Computed Aided Diagnosis (CAD) systems are becoming increasingly popular to automate DBT image analysis. Literature reports the importance of pre-processing operations on the final performance of the CAD itself. For this purpose, within the DeepLook project, we developed a pre-processing tool, called Digital Breast Imaging Tool (DBIT).MethodsDBIT procedure improves image contrast, removes breast skin contour and pectoral muscle, so that optimized datasets can be prepared to feed deep learning-based CAD. More than 200 DBT volumes were extracted from a public repository, equally divided into negative and positive tumors (both benign and malignant), to assemble the "raw dataset" (original images) and the "processed dataset" (images processed with DBIT). The classification performance of common convolutional neural networks (i.e. VGG16, ResNet18 and DarkNet19) on both raw and processed dataset was evaluated by the following metrics: AUROC, Accuracy, F1 score, Precision, Sensitivity and Specificity.ResultsAll neural networks performed better when trained and tested on the processed dataset, evidenced by the percentage increases in the mean values of all metrics considered. In particular, VGG16, ResNet18 and DarkNet19 presented an average classification accuracy increased by about 12%, 26% and 16%, respectively.ConclusionsDifferent deep learning-based CAD proved a significant reliability increase in breast cancer prediction, when trained and tested on images pre-processed with the proposed DBIT.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 91
页数:11
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Aggarwal C., 2018, Neural Networks and Deep Learning, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-94463-0
[2]   Enhancing breast pectoral muscle segmentation performance by using skip connections in fully convolutional network [J].
Ali, Muhammad Junaid ;
Raza, Basit ;
Shahid, Ahmad Raza ;
Mahmood, Fahad ;
Yousuf, Muhammad Adil ;
Dar, Amir Hanif ;
Iqbal, Uzair .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMAGING SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 30 (04) :1108-1118
[3]   Toward a priori noise characterization for real-time edge-aware denoising in fluoroscopic devices [J].
Andreozzi, Emilio ;
Fratini, Antonio ;
Esposito, Daniele ;
Cesarelli, Mario ;
Bifulco, Paolo .
BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING ONLINE, 2021, 20 (01)
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Breast cancer statistics
[5]   Preprocessing of Breast Cancer Images to Create Datasets for Deep-CNN [J].
Beeravolu, Abhijith Reddy ;
Azam, Sami ;
Jonkman, Mirjam ;
Shanmugam, Bharanidharan ;
Kannoorpatti, Krishnan ;
Anwar, Adnan .
IEEE ACCESS, 2021, 9 :33438-33463
[6]   A Data Set and Deep Learning Algorithm for the Detection of Masses and Architectural Distortions in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images [J].
Buda, Mateusz ;
Saha, Ashirbani ;
Walsh, Ruth ;
Ghate, Sujata ;
Li, Nianyi ;
Swiecicki, Albert ;
Lo, Joseph Y. ;
Mazurowski, Maciej A. .
JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2021, 4 (08) :E2119100
[7]  
cancer, Breast Cancer|Breast Cancer Information & Overview
[8]   Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Concepts and Clinical Practice [J].
Chong, Alice ;
Weinstein, Susan P. ;
McDonald, Elizabeth S. ;
Conant, Emily F. .
RADIOLOGY, 2019, 292 (01) :1-14
[9]   Comparison of standard reading and computer aided detection (CAD) on a national proficiency test of screening mammography [J].
Ciatto, S ;
Del Turco, MR ;
Risso, G ;
Catarzi, S ;
Bonardi, R ;
Viterbo, V ;
Gnutti, P ;
Guglielmoni, B ;
Pinelli, L ;
Pandiscia, A ;
Navarra, F ;
Lauria, A ;
Palmiero, R ;
Indovina, PL .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2003, 45 (02) :135-138
[10]   Automatic identification of the pectoral muscle in mammograms [J].
Ferrari, RJ ;
Rangayyan, RM ;
Desautels, JEL ;
Borges, RA ;
Frère, AF .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2004, 23 (02) :232-245