Threat Dynamics and Police Use of Force

被引:2
作者
Krajewski, Andrew T. [1 ,3 ]
Worrall, John L. [1 ]
Scales, Robert M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Dallas, Sch Econ Polit & Policy Sci, Criminol & Criminal Justice Program, Richardson, TX 75080 USA
[2] Police Strategies LLC, Seattle, WA USA
[3] Univ Texas Dallas, Criminol & Criminal Justice Program, 800 W Campbell Rd, Richardson, TX 75080 USA
关键词
police use of force; threat; resistance; force factor; sequential development; MEASUREMENT ERROR; FIGHTING ABILITY; OFFICERS DILEMMA; BLACK; RACE; CONSEQUENCES; AGGRESSION; PREVALENCE; PUNISHMENT;
D O I
10.1177/00224278231194711
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Objective: Police officers' use of force (UoF) has traditionally been understood vis-a-vis subject resistance, but researchers have recently argued for a greater emphasis on subject threat. We examine the role of static and dynamic threat measures, consisting of indicators for ability, opportunity, and intent, in police UoF while accounting for subject resistance. Data and Methods: We use data from a large multiagency sample of coded police force narratives and a series of multilevel models that nest temporally ordered force sequences (dyadic exchanges between officers and subjects) within their respective UoF incidents. Results: Our results suggest that (1) police force incidents are dynamic with levels of force and resistance often fluctuating throughout the incident, (2) each element of subject threat significantly predicts force, net of resistance and other variables, and (3) the elements of threat interact with one another to explain force, but not completely as expected. Conclusions: Our results suggest that subject threat, in addition to resistance, provides important insights for understanding when officers either use or escalate force. We conclude with suggestions for those interested in further exploring the intersection of threat, resistance, and police UoF.
引用
收藏
页码:900 / 948
页数:49
相关论文
共 88 条
[41]   SUSPECT MENTAL DISORDER AND POLICE USE OF FORCE [J].
Johnson, Richard R. .
CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND BEHAVIOR, 2011, 38 (02) :127-145
[42]   Confounding and collinearity in regression analysis: a cautionary tale and an alternative procedure, illustrated by studies of British voting behaviour [J].
Johnston, Ron ;
Jones, Kelvyn ;
Manley, David .
QUALITY & QUANTITY, 2018, 52 (04) :1957-1976
[43]   How Suspect Race Affects Police Use of Force in an Interaction Over Time [J].
Kahn, Kimberly Barsamian ;
Steele, Joel S. ;
McMahon, Jean M. ;
Stewart, Greg .
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2017, 41 (02) :117-126
[44]   THE EFFECTS OF WEAPONRY ON HUMAN VIOLENCE [J].
KLECK, G ;
MCELRATH, K .
SOCIAL FORCES, 1991, 69 (03) :669-692
[45]  
Klinger D., 2004, KILL ZONE COPS EYE V
[46]  
Klinger D.A., 2009, CRIMINOL PUBLIC POL, V8, P117, DOI [DOI 10.1111/J.17459133.2009.00537.X, 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2009.00537.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1745-9133.2009.00537.X]
[47]  
Kyle McLean, 2019, POLICE CHIEF
[48]  
Letkemann P., 1973, CRIME AS WORK
[49]   The Demographic and Political Composition of Mechanical Turk Samples [J].
Levay, Kevin E. ;
Freese, Jeremy ;
Druckman, James N. .
SAGE OPEN, 2016, 6 (01)
[50]   Police officers' actual vs. recalled path of travel in response to a threatening traffic stop scenario [J].
Lewinski, William J. ;
Dysterheft, Jennifer L. ;
Priem, Matthew M. ;
Pettitt, Robert W. .
POLICE PRACTICE AND RESEARCH, 2016, 17 (01) :51-67