Lateral interbody fusion without intraoperative neuromonitoring in addition to posterior instrumented fusion in geriatric patients: A single center consecutive series of 108 surgeries

被引:1
|
作者
Bobinski, Lukas [2 ]
Liv, Per [3 ]
Meyer, Bernhard [1 ]
Krieg, Sandro M. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Neurosurg, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Munich, Germany
[2] Ume& Univ Hosp, Spine Unit, Umea, Sweden
[3] Umea Univ, Dept Publ Hlth & Clin Med, Sect Sustainable Hlth, Umea, Sweden
[4] Tech Univ, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Dept Neurosurg, Ismaninger Str 22, D-81675 Munich, Germany
来源
BRAIN AND SPINE | 2023年 / 3卷
关键词
Anterior spine surgery; Lateral thoracic interbody fusion; Lateral lumbar interbody fusion; IONM; Neuromonitoring; LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS; TRANSPSOAS APPROACH; PERIOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; ARTHRODESIS; OUTCOMES; AGE; MORTALITY; DECOMPRESSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.bas.2023.101782
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) and lateral thoracic interbody fusion (LTIF), supported by intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM), gained popularity as a mini-invasive alternatives for standard interbody fusion. The objective of this study was to investigate the clinical outcome in a large elderly patient cohort who underwent LTIF/LLIF without IONM. Methods: This retrospective, single-center study enrolled elderly patients (& GE;70 years old) operated during the period from 2010 to 2016. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) in the L5/S1 segment was excluded from the analysis. Results: The study enrolled 108 patients (63 males, 58.3%) with a mean age of 76.5 y/o. The mean follow-up was 14.4 & PLUSMN; 11.3 months. The mean time of the surgery was 92 & PLUSMN; 34.2 min. The mean blood loss was 62.2 ml. There were no vascular or visceral surgical complications. 39 medical complications were encountered in 24 (22%) patients. Less than 5% of patients presented with a new onset of motor weakness and less than 2% of the patients developed a new sensory deficit at the discharge. 46% of patients were lost in follow-up at 12 months. Conclusions: IONM is not mandatory for LLIF/LTIF surgery in geriatric patients and has a low frequency of approach-related complications as well as neurological deterioration. Our results are comparable to the available literature. Regardless of the utilization of these mini-invasive, anterior approaches, in patients of advanced aged, the risk for major medical complications is high and is responsible for contributing to prolonged hospitalization.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] Lateral lumbar interbody fusion without intraoperative neuromonitoring: a single-center consecutive series of 157 surgeries
    Krieg, Sandro M.
    Bobinski, Lukas
    Albers, Lucia
    Meyer, Bernhard
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2019, 30 (04) : 439 - 445
  • [2] Multimodality Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Review of Alerts in 628 Patients
    Alluri, Ram K.
    Vaishnav, Avani S.
    Sivaganesan, Ahilan
    Ricci, Luke
    Sheha, Evan
    Qureshi, Sheeraz A.
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 13 (02) : 466 - 471
  • [3] Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) in a consecutive series of 72 patients
    Pojskic, Mirza
    Sass, Benjamin
    Voellger, Benjamin
    Nimsky, Christopher
    Carl, Barbara
    BOSNIAN JOURNAL OF BASIC MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 21 (05) : 587 - 597
  • [4] Feasibility and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Outpatient Single-Level Instrumented Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in a Surgery Center
    Chin, Kingsley R.
    Coombs, Andre V.
    Seale, Jason A.
    SPINE, 2015, 40 (01) : E36 - E42
  • [5] Does the Addition of Either a Lateral or Posterior Interbody Device to Posterior Instrumented Lumbar Fusion Decrease Cost Over a 6-Year Period?
    Schadler, Paul
    Derman, Peter
    Lee, Lily
    Do, Huong
    Girardi, Federico P.
    Cammisa, Frank P.
    Sama, Andrew A.
    Shue, Jennifer
    Koutsoumbelis, Stelios
    Hughes, Alexander P.
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 8 (05) : 471 - 477
  • [6] Learning Curve and Complications Experience of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion : A Single-Center 143 Consecutive Cases
    Oh, Bu Kwang
    Son, Dong Wuk
    Lee, Su Hun
    Lee, Jun Seok
    Sung, Soon Ki
    Lee, Sang Weon
    Song, Geun Sung
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN NEUROSURGICAL SOCIETY, 2021, 64 (03) : 447 - 459
  • [7] Long-Term Motor versus Sensory Lumbar Plexopathy After Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Single-Center Experience, Intraoperative Neuromonitoring Results, and Multivariate Analysis of Patient-Level Predictors
    Zheng, Bryan
    Leary, Owen P.
    Ii, Robert A. Beer
    Liu, David D.
    Nuss, Sarah
    Barrios-Anderson, Adriel
    Darveau, Spencer
    Syed, Sohail
    Gokaslan, Ziya L.
    Telfeian, Albert E.
    Oyelese, Adetokunbo A.
    Fridley, Jared S.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 170 : E568 - E576
  • [8] Learning curve and complication analysis of oblique lateral interbody fusion in cases with single-segment lumbar tuberculosis: a retrospective single-center consecutive study
    Jiang, Guanyin
    Wang, Qiufu
    Lei, Miao
    Tang, Yuchen
    Liao, Haoran
    Du, Xing
    Shui, Wei
    Hu, Zhenming
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [9] Oblique lateral interbody fusion in heterogenous lumbar diseases: Anterolateral screw fixation vs. posterior percutaneous pedicle screw fixation - A single center experience
    Wu, Meng-Ting
    Chung, Tzu-Tsao
    Chen, Shao-Ching
    Kao, Tzu-Jen
    Song, Wen-Shin
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2022, 9