Impact of different health warning label and reduced exposure messages in IQOS ads on perceptions among US and Israeli adults

被引:6
作者
Berg, Carla J. [1 ]
Duan, Zongshuan [1 ]
Wang, Yan [1 ]
Thrasher, James F. [2 ]
Abroms, Lorien C. [1 ]
Khayat, Amal [3 ]
Romm, Katelyn F. [4 ]
Levine, Hagai [3 ]
Bar-Zeev, Yael [3 ]
机构
[1] George Washington Univ, Milken Inst Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Prevent & Community Hlth, 800 22nd St NW,7000C, Washington, DC 20052 USA
[2] Univ South Carolina, Arnold Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Promot Educ & Behav, Columbia, SC USA
[3] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem & Hadassah, Fac Med, Braun Sch Publ Hlth & Community Med, Jerusalem, Israel
[4] Univ Oklahoma, Coll Med, TSET Hlth Promot Res Ctr, Stephenson Canc Ctr,Dept Pediat,Hlth Sci Ctr, Oklahoma City, OK USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Tobacco control; Health communications; Risk perception; Alternative tobacco products; Heated tobacco products; Marketing; Tobacco use; TOBACCO PRODUCTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102209
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Heated tobacco products (HTPs; e.g., IQOS) are advertised as safer than cigarettes or an alternative, yet required health warning labels (HWLS) in many countries, including the US and Israel, do not consider whether HTP ads undermine HWLs, particularly those that do not explicitly address HTPs. In 2021, a randomized 4 x 3 factorial experiment among 2,222 US and Israeli adults examined IQOS ads with differing: 1) HWLs (i.e., smoking risks, prompt to quit, HTP-specific, control); and 2) ad messages (i.e., slight distancing: "cigarette-like satisfaction, no odor", clear distancing: "looking for an alternative?", control). Outcomes were perceived relative harm (vs cigarettes), exposure to harmful chemicals, and disease risk and likelihood of trying or suggesting IQOS to smokers. Ordinal logistic regression was used, adjusted for covariates. One HWL effect was found: risk (vs control) increased perceived relative harm (aOR = 1.21, CI = 1.03-1.41) and exposure (aOR = 1.22, CI = 1.04-1.42) and decreased likelihood of trying IQOS (aOR = 0.82, CI = 0.69-0.97). Both slight and clear distancing ads (vs control) decreased perceived harm (aOR = 0.85, CI = 0.75-0.97; aOR = 0.63, CI = 0.55-0.72, respectively) and increased likelihood of suggesting IQOS to smokers (aOR = 1.23, CI = 1.07-1.41; aOR = 1.28, CI = 1.11-1.47); slight distancing decreased perceived disease risk (aOR = 0.85, CI = 0.75-0.97); and clear distancing decreased perceived exposure (aOR = 0.73, CI = 0.64-0.83). Clear (vs slight) distancing decreased perceived relative harm (aOR = 0.74, CI = 0.65-0.85) and exposure (aOR = 0.82, CI = 0.71-0.93). One interaction effect was found: the quitting HWL and clear distancing led to particularly low perceived relative harm (aOR = 0.63, CI = 0.43-0.93). Regulatory agencies must monitor the impacts of advertising, including reduced risk/exposure messaging on perceptions of HWL messages, to inform future regulatory efforts.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2022, US FDA CIG HLTH WARN
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2010, US News and World Report
  • [3] Bar-Zeev Y., 2020, TOBACCO LEGISLATION, DOI [10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-056041, DOI 10.1136/TOBACCOCONTROL-2020-056041]
  • [4] IQOS marketing strategies in the USA before and after US FDA modified risk tobacco product authorisation
    Berg, Carla J.
    Romm, Katelyn F.
    Bar-Zeev, Yael
    Abroms, Lorien C.
    Klinkhammer, Katharina
    Wysota, Christina N.
    Khayat, Amal
    Broniatowski, David A.
    Levine, Hagai
    [J]. TOBACCO CONTROL, 2023, 32 (04) : 418 - 427
  • [5] Informing iQOS Regulations in the United States: A Synthesis of What We Know
    Berg, Carla J.
    Bar-Zeev, Yael
    Levine, Hagai
    [J]. SAGE OPEN, 2020, 10 (01):
  • [6] Heat-not-burn tobacco products are about to reach their boiling point
    Caputi, Theodore L.
    [J]. TOBACCO CONTROL, 2017, 26 (05) : 609 - 610
  • [7] Effect of a hypothetical modified risk tobacco product claim on heated tobacco product use intention and perceptions in young adults
    Chen-Sankey, Julia C.
    Kechter, Afton
    Barrington-Trimis, Jessica
    McConnell, Rob
    Krueger, Evan A.
    Cruz, Tess Boley
    Unger, Jennifer B.
    Chaffee, Benjamin W.
    Leventhal, Adam
    [J]. TOBACCO CONTROL, 2023, 32 (01) : 42 - 50
  • [8] Possible hepatotoxicity of IQOS
    Chun, Lauren
    Moazed, Farzad
    Matthay, Michael
    Calfee, Carolyn
    Gotts, Jeffrey
    [J]. TOBACCO CONTROL, 2018, 27 : S39 - S40
  • [9] Impact of modified risk tobacco product claims on beliefs of US adults and adolescents
    El-Toukhy, Sherine
    Baig, Sabeeh A.
    Jeong, Michelle
    Byron, M. Justin
    Ribisl, Kurt M.
    Brewer, Noel T.
    [J]. TOBACCO CONTROL, 2018, 27 : S62 - S69
  • [10] Heated tobacco products: the example of IQOS
    Glantz, Stanton A.
    [J]. TOBACCO CONTROL, 2018, 27 : S1 - S6