Impact of positive surgical margins (PSMs) after robotic prostatectomy on biochemical recurrence (BCR): Multicenter analysis

被引:0
作者
Fiorello, Nicolo [1 ,4 ]
Di Benedetto, Andrea [2 ]
Brizzi, Luca [3 ]
Mogorovich, Andrea [2 ]
Summonti, Daniele [2 ]
Silvestri, Giuseppe [1 ]
Benvenuti, Sandro [2 ]
Sepich, Carlo Alberto [1 ]
机构
[1] Osped San Luca, UOC Urol, Lucca, Italy
[2] Osped Versilia, UOC Urol, Camaiore, Italy
[3] Osped Santa Chiara, UOC Urol, Trento, Italy
[4] Via Provinciale Vallecchia 42, I-55045 Pietrasanta, LU, Italy
关键词
Prostate cancer; positive surgical margins; biochemical recurrence; mininvasive surgery; RARP; pathology; PSA; ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; CANCER;
D O I
10.1177/03915603231183478
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To study and analyze any correlations between positive surgical margins after RARP and biochemical recurrence. Methods: We enrolled 105 patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) from 2016-2020 with PSMs on final pathology, all performed or supervised by a senior surgeon in two tertiary referral center. Pathology has been described indicating also the area (apical, base, mediolateral, anterior, or multiple) and the extent of PSMs: focal (& LE;3 mm) or extensive (>3 mm). Cox univariable and multi-variable regression models were used to find the correlation between clinico-pathologic factors: age, local staging, PSA, grading, area, and size of PSMs). Results: We found a good correlation between PSA and grading and between PSA and local staging (T) (p < 0.001). There was no clear correlation between the PSM area with grading nor with T staging. There is a statistically significant correlation between extensive PSM and the worsening of grading and local staging (p < 0.001). BCR rate also has a strong correlation with the worsening of grading and local staging (T) (p < 0.001). A relevant fact is the difference between the BCR rate in the apical and base PSM (34.88%vs 62.5%; p < 0.001) which are the most frequent locations of PSMs. Discussion: PSMs remain a predictor of BCR but which may have controversial significance. The likelihood of BCR increases as grading or local staging gets worse. However, apical PSM is a relatively less powerful predictor of postoperative BCR. This can help to better select patients for subsequent RT, which still causes important side effects.
引用
收藏
页码:647 / 652
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Characteristics of positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, open retropubic radical prostatectomy, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a comparative histopathologic study from a single academic center [J].
Albadine, Roula ;
Hyndman, Matthew E. ;
Chaux, Alcides ;
Jeong, J. Y. ;
Saab, Shahrazad ;
Tavora, Fabio ;
Epstein, Jonathan I. ;
Gonzalgo, Mark L. ;
Pavlovich, Christian P. ;
Netto, George J. .
HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2012, 43 (02) :254-260
[2]   Anatomic site-specific positive margins in organ-confined prostate cancer and its impact on outcome after radical prostatectomy [J].
Blute, ML ;
Bostwick, DG ;
Bergstralh, EJ ;
Slezak, JM ;
Martin, SK ;
Amling, CL ;
Zincke, H .
UROLOGY, 1997, 50 (05) :733-739
[3]   Impact of surgical margin status on prostate-cancer-specific mortality [J].
Chalfin, Heather J. ;
Dinizo, Michael ;
Trock, Bruce J. ;
Feng, Zhaoyong ;
Partin, Alan W. ;
Walsh, Patrick C. ;
Humphreys, Elizabeth ;
Han, Misop .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 110 (11) :1684-1689
[4]   The clinical significance of in-depth pathological assessment of extraprostatic extension and margin status in radical prostatectomies for prostate cancer [J].
Chan, S. M. ;
Garcia, F. J. ;
Chin, J. L. ;
Moussa, M. ;
Gabril, M. Y. .
PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2011, 14 (04) :307-312
[5]   Prostate Cancer That Is Within 0.1 mm of the Surgical Margin of a Radical Prostatectomy Predicts Greater Likelihood of Recurrence [J].
Izard, Jason P. ;
True, Lawrence D. ;
May, Philip ;
Ellis, William J. ;
Lange, Paul H. ;
Dalkin, Bruce ;
Lin, Daniel W. ;
Schmidt, Rodney A. ;
Wright, Jonathan L. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2014, 38 (03) :333-338
[6]   Importance of Reporting the Gleason Score at the Positive Surgical Margin Site: Analysis of 4,082 Consecutive Radical Prostatectomy Cases [J].
Kates, Max ;
Sopko, Nikolai A. ;
Han, Misop ;
Partin, Alan W. ;
Epstein, Jonathan I. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (02) :337-342
[7]   IMPACT OF PRIMARY GLEASON GRADE ON RISK STRATIFICATION FOR GLEASON SCORE 7 PROSTATE CANCERS [J].
Koontz, Bridget F. ;
Tsivian, Matvey ;
Mouraviev, Vladimir ;
Sun, Leon ;
Vujaskovic, Zeljko ;
Moul, Judd ;
Lee, W. Robert .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 82 (01) :200-203
[8]   Implementation of a Surgeon-Level Comparative Quality Performance Review to Improve Positive Surgical Margin Rates during Radical Prostatectomy [J].
Matulewicz, Richard S. ;
Tosoian, Jeffrey J. ;
Stimson, C. J. ;
Ross, Ashley E. ;
Chappidi, Meera ;
Lotan, Tamara L. ;
Humphreys, Elizabeth ;
Partin, Alan W. ;
Schaeffer, Edward M. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (05) :1245-1250
[9]   The Impact of Solitary and Multiple Positive Surgical Margins on Hard Clinical End Points in 1712 Adjuvant Treatment-Naive pT2-4 N0 Radical Prostatectomy Patients [J].
Mauermann, Julian ;
Fradet, Vincent ;
Lacombe, Louis ;
Dujardin, Thierry ;
Tiguert, Rabi ;
Tetu, Bernard ;
Fradet, Yves .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2013, 64 (01) :19-25
[10]   Radical prostatectomy: Positive surgical margins matter [J].
Meeks, Joshua J. ;
Eastham, James A. .
UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2013, 31 (07) :974-979