Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS)-based Characterization Solid Renal Masses: A role for quantitative imaging approaches

被引:0
|
作者
Varghese, Bino A. [1 ]
Rivas, Marielena [2 ]
Cen, Steven [1 ]
Lei, Xiaomeng [1 ]
Chang, Michael [3 ]
Lee, KwangJu [4 ]
Gunter, Jamie [1 ]
Amoedo, Renata L. [5 ]
Franco, Mario [1 ]
Hwang, Darryl H. [1 ]
Desai, Bhushan [1 ]
King, Kevin G. [6 ]
Cheng, Phillip M. [1 ]
Duddalwar, Vinay [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Calif, Keck Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
[2] Univ Richmond, Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[3] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, New York, NY USA
[4] Samsung Medison Co Ltd, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Hosp Sao Rafael Rede Dor, Salvador, BA, Brazil
[6] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
来源
18TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON MEDICAL INFORMATION PROCESSING AND ANALYSIS | 2023年 / 12567卷
关键词
CEUS; Radiomics; TIC; renal masses; visual assessment;
D O I
10.1117/12.2670366
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In this prospective study, forty patients with solid renal masses who underwent contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) examinations were selected. Using the ImageJ software, renal masses and adjacent normal tissue were manually segmented from CEUS cine exams obtained using the built-in RS85 Samsung scanner software. For the radiomics analysis, one frame representing precontrast, early, peak, and delay enhancement phase were selected post segmentation from each CEUS clip. From each region of interest (ROI) within a tumor tissue normalized renal mass, 112 radiomic metrics were extracted using custom Matlab (R) code. For the time-intensity curve (TIC) analysis, the segmented ROIs were plotted as a function of time, and the data were fit to a washout curve. From these time-signal intensity curves, perfusion quantitative parameters, were generated. Wilcoxon rank sum test or univariate independent t-test depending on data normality were used for descriptive analyses. Agreement was analyzed using Kappa statistic. Of the 40 solid masses, 31 (77.5%) were malignant, 9 (22.5%) were benign based on histopathology. Excellent agreement was found between histopathological confirmation and visual assessment based on CEUS in discriminating solid renal masses into benign vs. malignant categories (kappa=0.89 95% confidence interval ( CI): (0.77,1)). The total agreement between the two was 92.5%. The sensitivity and specificity of CEUS-based visual assessment was found to be 100% and 66.7%, respectively. Quantitative analysis revealed TIC metrics revealed statistically significant differences between the malignant and benign groups and between clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) subtypes. The study shows excellent agreement between visual assessment and histopathology, but with the room to improve in specificity.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) as a new technique to characterize suspected renal transplant malignancies in renal transplant patients in comparison to standard imaging modalities
    Mueller-Peltzer, K.
    de Figueiredo, G. Negrao
    Fischereder, M.
    Habicht, A.
    Ruebenthaler, J.
    Clevert, D-A
    CLINICAL HEMORHEOLOGY AND MICROCIRCULATION, 2018, 69 (1-2) : 69 - 75
  • [42] Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for the evaluation of gallbladder diseases
    de Figueiredoa, G. Negrao
    Mueller-Peltzer, K.
    Zengel, P.
    Armbruster, M.
    Ruebenthaler, J.
    Clevert, D. A.
    CLINICAL HEMORHEOLOGY AND MICROCIRCULATION, 2018, 69 (1-2) : 83 - 91
  • [43] Quantitative Assessment of Bone Microvascularization After Osteocutaneous Flap Transplantation Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS)
    Geis, S.
    Prantl, L.
    Mueller, S.
    Gosau, M.
    Lamby, P.
    Jung, E. M.
    ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN, 2013, 34 (03): : 272 - 279
  • [44] Diagnosis of perinephric retroperitoneal lymphangioma supported by contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)
    Ruebenthaler, J.
    Paprottka, K.
    D'Anastasi, M.
    Reiser, M.
    Clevert, D. A.
    CLINICAL HEMORHEOLOGY AND MICROCIRCULATION, 2017, 65 (01) : 43 - 47
  • [45] Technical aspects of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) examinations: Tips and tricks
    Greis, C.
    CLINICAL HEMORHEOLOGY AND MICROCIRCULATION, 2014, 58 (01) : 89 - 95
  • [46] Evaluation of renal microperfusion in hyperuricemic nephropathy by contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging
    He, Li
    Li, Ze
    Zhang, Qunzi
    Chen, Yini
    Gao, Yihui
    Chen, Teng
    Wang, Niansong
    Jiang, Lixin
    Fan, Ying
    DISEASE MODELS & MECHANISMS, 2022, 15 (07)
  • [47] Use of lumason/sonovue in contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the kidney for characterization of renal masses-a meta-analysis
    Barr, Richard G.
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2022, 47 (01) : 272 - 287
  • [48] Single-center study: the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for assessing renal oncocytoma
    Schwarze, Vincent
    Marschner, Constantin
    de Figueiredo, Giovanna
    Knoesel, Thomas
    Ruebenthaler, Johannes
    Clevert, Dirk-Andre
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 54 (02) : 135 - 140
  • [49] The use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for the diagnostic evaluation of hepatic echinococcosis
    Schwarze, V
    Mueller-Peltzer, K.
    de Figueiredo, G. Negrao
    Lindner, F.
    Ruebenthaler, J.
    Clevert, D-A
    CLINICAL HEMORHEOLOGY AND MICROCIRCULATION, 2018, 70 (04) : 449 - 455
  • [50] Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound characteristics of renal tumors: VueBox™ quantitative analysis
    Li, Ning
    Hu, Ziyue
    Liu, Yang
    Ding, Jianmin
    Han, Pengcheng
    Jing, Xiang
    Kan, Yanmin
    CLINICAL HEMORHEOLOGY AND MICROCIRCULATION, 2023, 85 (04) : 341 - 354