Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS)-based Characterization Solid Renal Masses: A role for quantitative imaging approaches

被引:0
|
作者
Varghese, Bino A. [1 ]
Rivas, Marielena [2 ]
Cen, Steven [1 ]
Lei, Xiaomeng [1 ]
Chang, Michael [3 ]
Lee, KwangJu [4 ]
Gunter, Jamie [1 ]
Amoedo, Renata L. [5 ]
Franco, Mario [1 ]
Hwang, Darryl H. [1 ]
Desai, Bhushan [1 ]
King, Kevin G. [6 ]
Cheng, Phillip M. [1 ]
Duddalwar, Vinay [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Calif, Keck Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
[2] Univ Richmond, Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[3] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, New York, NY USA
[4] Samsung Medison Co Ltd, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Hosp Sao Rafael Rede Dor, Salvador, BA, Brazil
[6] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
来源
18TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON MEDICAL INFORMATION PROCESSING AND ANALYSIS | 2023年 / 12567卷
关键词
CEUS; Radiomics; TIC; renal masses; visual assessment;
D O I
10.1117/12.2670366
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In this prospective study, forty patients with solid renal masses who underwent contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) examinations were selected. Using the ImageJ software, renal masses and adjacent normal tissue were manually segmented from CEUS cine exams obtained using the built-in RS85 Samsung scanner software. For the radiomics analysis, one frame representing precontrast, early, peak, and delay enhancement phase were selected post segmentation from each CEUS clip. From each region of interest (ROI) within a tumor tissue normalized renal mass, 112 radiomic metrics were extracted using custom Matlab (R) code. For the time-intensity curve (TIC) analysis, the segmented ROIs were plotted as a function of time, and the data were fit to a washout curve. From these time-signal intensity curves, perfusion quantitative parameters, were generated. Wilcoxon rank sum test or univariate independent t-test depending on data normality were used for descriptive analyses. Agreement was analyzed using Kappa statistic. Of the 40 solid masses, 31 (77.5%) were malignant, 9 (22.5%) were benign based on histopathology. Excellent agreement was found between histopathological confirmation and visual assessment based on CEUS in discriminating solid renal masses into benign vs. malignant categories (kappa=0.89 95% confidence interval ( CI): (0.77,1)). The total agreement between the two was 92.5%. The sensitivity and specificity of CEUS-based visual assessment was found to be 100% and 66.7%, respectively. Quantitative analysis revealed TIC metrics revealed statistically significant differences between the malignant and benign groups and between clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) subtypes. The study shows excellent agreement between visual assessment and histopathology, but with the room to improve in specificity.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Use of lumason/sonovue in contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the kidney for characterization of renal masses—a meta-analysis
    Richard G. Barr
    Abdominal Radiology, 2022, 47 : 272 - 287
  • [32] Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the Evaluation of Hemoperitoneum in Patients With Cirrhosis
    Abushamat, Farid
    Dietrich, Christoph F.
    Clevert, Dirk-Andre
    Piscaglia, Fabio
    Fetzer, David T.
    Meloni, Maria Franca
    Shiehmorteza, Masoud
    Kono, Yuko
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2023, 42 (01) : 247 - 253
  • [33] Role of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in Native Kidney Pathology: Limits and Fields of Action
    Granata, Antonio
    Campo, Irene
    Lentini, Paolo
    Pesce, Francesco
    Gesualdo, Loreto
    Basile, Antonio
    Cantisani, Vito
    Zeiler, Matthias
    Bertolotto, Michele
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2021, 11 (06)
  • [34] The diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) as a new technique for imaging of vascular complications in renal transplants compared to standard imaging modalities
    Mueller-Peltzer, K.
    Ruebenthaler, J.
    Fischereder, M.
    Habicht, A.
    Reiser, M.
    Clevert, D. -A.
    CLINICAL HEMORHEOLOGY AND MICROCIRCULATION, 2017, 67 (3-4) : 407 - 413
  • [35] Application of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound and Bosniak Classification to the Diagnosis of Cystic Renal Masses
    Huang, Mei-Feng
    Zhang, Zhi
    Xia, Qing-Qing
    Zhou, Xi-Ling
    Yuan, Xin-Chun
    Zhou, Zhi-Yu
    CURRENT MEDICAL IMAGING, 2022, 18 (14) : 1470 - 1478
  • [36] RENAL MASSES: EVALUATION WITH CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASOUND, WITH A SPECIAL FOCUS ON THE PSEUDOCAPSULE SIGN
    Dai, Wen-Bin
    Yu, Bo
    Diao, Xue-Hong
    Cao, Hongli
    Chen, Lin
    Chen, Yue
    Zhan, Jia
    ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2019, 45 (08) : 1924 - 1932
  • [37] Vascular rejection in renal transplant: Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) compared to biopsy
    Mueller-Peltzer, K.
    de Figueiredo, G. Negrao
    Fischereder, M.
    Habicht, A.
    Ruebenthaler, J.
    Clevert, D-A
    CLINICAL HEMORHEOLOGY AND MICROCIRCULATION, 2018, 69 (1-2) : 77 - 82
  • [38] Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) of cystic renal lesions in comparison to CT and MRI in a multicenter setting
    Lerchbaumer, Markus Herbert
    Putz, Franz Josef
    Ruebenthaler, Johannes
    Rogasch, Julian
    Jung, Ernst-Michael
    Clevert, Dirk-Andre
    Hamm, Bernd
    Makowski, Marcus
    Fischer, Thomas
    CLINICAL HEMORHEOLOGY AND MICROCIRCULATION, 2020, 75 (04) : 419 - 429
  • [39] Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Fundamentals: The Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics of Contrast. Basics of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging
    Fontanilla Echeveste, M. T.
    Ripolles Gonzalez, T.
    Aguirre Pascual, E.
    RADIOLOGIA, 2024, 66 : S36 - S50
  • [40] Vascular complications in liver transplantation: Beneficial role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the postoperative phase
    Ruebenthaler, J.
    Paprottka, K. J.
    Hameister, E.
    Hoffmann, K.
    Joiko, N.
    Reiser, M.
    Clevert, D. A.
    CLINICAL HEMORHEOLOGY AND MICROCIRCULATION, 2016, 64 (03) : 475 - 482