Estimation of Arctic sea ice thickness from CryoSat-2 altimetry data

被引:1
作者
Jiang, Jinghui [1 ]
Liu, Shanwei [1 ,2 ]
Sun, Qintin [1 ]
Wan, Jianhua [1 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Petr, Coll Oceanog & Space Informat, Qingdao, Peoples R China
[2] China Univ Petr, Coll Oceanog & Space Informat, Qingdao 266580, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Sea ice thickness; CryoSat-2; Freeboard; Arctic; SNOW DEPTH; FREEBOARD; VARIABILITY; RETRIEVAL; SURFACE; LASER;
D O I
10.1080/01431161.2023.2195575
中图分类号
TP7 [遥感技术];
学科分类号
081102 ; 0816 ; 081602 ; 083002 ; 1404 ;
摘要
Arctic sea ice change is one of the critical factors affecting the global climate environment; hence, it is crucial to obtain sea ice thickness with high accuracy while studying polar and global climate change. In the process of using altimetry data to estimate sea ice thickness, the mean sea surface height will bring greater uncertainty to the extraction of sea ice freeboard, which will affect the accuracy of sea ice thickness. Also, the influence of snow cover on radar signal penetration will bring greater uncertainty to sea ice thickness. In this paper, we present a processing chain for sea ice thickness estimation. First, we compare the effect of four different MSS models on the freeboard estimation. Then, considering the incomplete penetration of radar signals and the different speeds of radar signals penetrating the snow layer and the vacuum, the traditional sea ice thickness model is optimized to obtain the sea ice thickness. Compared with the Operation IceBridge (OIB) sea ice thickness, the accuracy of sea ice thickness obtained by the optimized model is better than 0.350 m, with a root mean square error of 0.260 m and a mean bias of 0.048 m. The comparison results show that the combination of the latest DTU18 MSS model and sea ice thickness optimization model effectively improve the accuracy of sea ice thickness.
引用
收藏
页码:2145 / 2167
页数:23
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   The relation between sea ice thickness and freeboard in the Arctic [J].
Alexandrov, V. ;
Sandven, S. ;
Wahlin, J. ;
Johannessen, O. M. .
CRYOSPHERE, 2010, 4 (03) :373-380
[2]  
Andersen O. B., 2018, NEW DTU18 MSS MEAN S
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2021, ARCTIC CLIMATE CHANG, P16
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2019, ARCTIC MONITORING AS, P12
[5]   Arctic sea ice freeboard from AltiKa and comparison with CryoSat-2 and Operation IceBridge [J].
Armitage, Thomas W. K. ;
Ridout, Andy L. .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2015, 42 (16) :6724-6731
[6]  
ESA, 2018, CRYOSAT 2 BAS D EV
[7]  
ESA, 2020, CRYOSAT 2 PROD HDB
[8]  
ESA, 2015, L2 PROD FORM SPEC
[9]   A First Assessment of IceBridge Snow and Ice Thickness Data Over Arctic Sea Ice [J].
Farrell, Sinead Louise ;
Kurtz, Nathan ;
Connor, Laurence N. ;
Elder, Bruce C. ;
Leuschen, Carlton ;
Markus, Thorsten ;
McAdoo, David C. ;
Panzer, Ben ;
Richter-Menge, Jacqueline ;
Sonntag, John G. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2012, 50 (06) :2098-2111
[10]   Combined airborne laser and radar altimeter measurements over the Fram Strait in May 2002 [J].
Giles, K. A. ;
Laxon, S. W. ;
Wingham, D. J. ;
Wallis, D. W. ;
Krabill, W. B. ;
Leuschen, C. J. ;
McAdoo, D. ;
Manizade, S. S. ;
Raney, R. K. .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 111 (2-3) :182-194