MCID and PASS in Knee Surgeries. Theoretical Aspects and Clinical Relevance References

被引:15
作者
Mabrouk, Ahmed [1 ,2 ]
Nwachukwu, Benedict [3 ]
Pareek, Ayoosh [3 ]
Karlsson, Jon [4 ]
Mouton, Caroline [5 ,6 ]
Ollivier, Matthieu [2 ]
Martin, R. Kyle [7 ]
机构
[1] Leeds Teaching Hosp, Dept Trauma & Orthopaed, Leeds, England
[2] Aix Marseille Univ, Sainte Marguer Hosp, Inst Locomot, APHM,CNRS,ISM, Marseille, France
[3] Hosp Special Surg, Dept Orthoped Surg, Sports Med & Shoulder Serv, New York, NY 10021 USA
[4] Gothenburg Univ, Orthopaed Res Dept, Gothenburg, Sweden
[5] Ctr Hospitalier Luxembourg Clin Eich, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
[6] Luxembourg Inst Res Orthopaed, Sports Med & Sci, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
[7] Univ Minnesota, Dept Orthoped Surg, Minneapolis, MN USA
关键词
Minimal clinically important difference (MCID); Patient acceptable symptom state (PASS); Patient reported outcome measures (PROM); PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES; ACCEPTABLE-SYMPTOM-STATE; SAMPLE-SIZE CALCULATIONS; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; IMPORTANT-DIFFERENCE; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; CONTROLLED-TRIALS; ACHIEVEMENT; RELIABILITY; IMPROVEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s00167-023-07359-2
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The application and interpretation of patient-reported outcome measures (PROM), following knee injuries, pathologies, and interventions, can be challenging. In recent years, the literature has been enriched with metrics to facilitate our understanding and interpretation of these outcome measures. Two commonly utilized tools include the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and the patient acceptable symptoms state (PASS). These measures have demonstrated clinical value, however, they have often been under- or mis-reported. It is paramount to use them to understand the clinical significance of any statistically significant results. Still, it remains important to know their caveats and limitations. In this focused report on MCID and PASS, their definitions, methods of calculations, clinical relevance, interpretations, and limitations are reviewed and presented in a simple approach.
引用
收藏
页码:2060 / 2067
页数:8
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Statistics notes - Standard deviations and standard errors [J].
Altman, DG ;
Bland, JM .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 331 (7521) :903-903
[2]   Evaluation of the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of pimavanserin versus placebo in patients with Alzheimer's disease psychosis: a phase 2, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind study [J].
Ballard, Clive ;
Banister, Carol ;
Khan, Zunera ;
Cummings, Jeffrey ;
Demos, George ;
Coate, Bruce ;
Youakim, James M. ;
Owen, Randall ;
Stankovic, Srdjan .
LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2018, 17 (03) :213-222
[3]   Can Preoperative Patient-reported Outcome Measures Be Used to Predict Meaningful Improvement in Function After TKA? [J].
Berliner, Jonathan L. ;
Brodke, Dane J. ;
Chan, Vanessa ;
SooHoo, Nelson F. ;
Bozic, Kevin J. .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2017, 475 (01) :149-157
[4]   Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis Treated With PRP Injection [J].
Boffa, Angelo ;
Andriolo, Luca ;
Franceschini, Marco ;
Di Martino, Alessandro ;
Asunis, Emanuela ;
Grassi, Alberto ;
Zaffagnini, Stefano ;
Filardo, Giuseppe .
ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2021, 9 (10)
[5]  
Case L. Douglas, 2007, V404, P377, DOI 10.1007/978-1-59745-530-5_19
[6]   Meaningful values in the Short Form Health Survey-36 after total knee arthroplasty - an alternative to the EuroQol five- dimension index as a measure for health- related quality of life [J].
Clement, N. D. ;
Weir, D. ;
Deehan, D. .
BONE & JOINT RESEARCH, 2022, 11 (07) :477-483
[7]  
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, V2nd, DOI 10.4324/9780203771587
[8]   Clinimetrics Corner: The Minimal Clinically Important Change Score (MCID): A Necessary Pretense [J].
Cook, Chad .
JOURNAL OF MANUAL & MANIPULATIVE THERAPY, 2008, 16 (04) :82E-83E
[9]   Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods [J].
Copay, Anne G. ;
Subach, Brian R. ;
Glassman, Steven D. ;
Polly, David W., Jr. ;
Schuler, Thomas C. .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2007, 7 (05) :541-546
[10]  
Copay AG, 2018, JBJS REV, V6, DOI 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.17.00160