Higher mortality in acute coronary syndrome patients without standard modifiable risk factors: Results from a global meta-analysis of 1,285,722 patients

被引:63
作者
Kong, Gwyneth [1 ]
Chin, Yip Han [1 ]
Chong, Bryan [1 ]
Goh, Rachel Sze Jen [1 ]
Lim, Oliver Zi Hern [1 ]
Ng, Cheng Han [1 ]
Muthiah, Mark [1 ]
Foo, Roger [1 ,2 ]
Vernon, Stephen T. [3 ]
Loh, Poay Huan [1 ,2 ]
Chan, Mark Y. [1 ,2 ]
Chew, Nicholas W. S. [2 ,4 ]
Figtree, Gemma A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Natl Univ Hlth Syst, Natl Univ Heart Ctr, Dept Cardiol, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Univ Sydney, Royal North Shore Hosp, Kolling Inst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Natl Univ Hlth Syst, Natl Univ Heart Ctr, Dept Cardiol, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore 119074, Singapore
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
SMuRF; Risk factor; Atherosclerosis; ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; Mortality; ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; LONG-TERM MORTALITY; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; BLOOD-PRESSURE; PREVALENCE; INSIGHTS; REGISTRY; DISEASE; THERAPY; OBESITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.09.062
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (SMuRF), comprising diabetes, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and smoking, are used for risk stratification in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Recent studies showed an increasing proportion of SMuRF-less ACS patients. Methods: Embase, Medline and Pubmed were searched for studies comparing SMuRF-less and SMuRF patients with first presentation of ACS. We conducted single-arm analyses to determine the proportion of SMuRF-less patients in the ACS cohort, and compared the clinical presentation and outcomes of these patients. Results: Of 1,285,722 patients from 15 studies, 11.56% were SMuRF-less. A total of 7.44% of non-ST-segment -elevation ACS patients and 12.87% of ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients were SMuRF-less. The proportion of SMuRF-less patients presenting with STEMI (60.71%) tended to be higher than those with SMuRFs (49.21%). Despite lower body mass index and fewer comorbidities such as chronic kidney disease, peripheral arterial disease, stroke and heart failure, SMuRF-less patients had increased in-hospital mortality (RR:1.57, 95%CI:1.38 to 1.80) and cardiogenic shock (RR:1.39, 95%CI:1.18 to 1.65), but lower risk of heart failure (RR:0.91, 95%CI:0.83 to 0.99). On discharge, SMuRF-less patients were prescribed less statins (RR:0.93, 95%CI:0.91 to 0.95), beta-blockers (RR:0.94, 95%CI:0.92 to 0.96), P2Y12 inhibitors (RR: 0.98, 95%CI: 0.96 to 0.99), and angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin-receptor blocker (RR:0.92, 95% CI:0.75 to 0.91). Conclusion: In this study level meta-analysis, SMuRF-less ACS patients demonstrate higher mortality compared with patients with at least one traditional atherosclerotic risk factor. Underuse of guideline-directed medical therapy amongst SMuRF-less patients is concerning. Unraveling novel risk factors amongst SMuRF-less in-dividuals is the next important step. Summary: Standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (SMuRF), comprising diabetes mellitus, hyperlipid-emia, hypertension, and smoking, are often used for risk stratification in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Recent studies showed an increasing proportion of SMuRF-less ACS patients. Of 1,285,722 ACS patients, 11.56% were SMuRF-less. Despite lower body mass index and fewer comorbidities, SMuRF-less patients had increased in -hospital mortality and cardiogenic shock. However, despite worse outcomes, SMuRF-less patients were pre-scribed less guideline-directed medical therapies on discharge.
引用
收藏
页码:432 / 440
页数:9
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   PREVALENCE OF CONVENTIONAL CARDIOVASCULAR RISK FACTORS IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES IN SLOVAKIA [J].
Alberty, Roman ;
Studencan, Martin ;
Kovar, Frantisek .
CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 25 (01) :77-84
[2]   Comparison of long-term mortality across the spectrum of acute coronary syndromes [J].
Allen, Larry A. ;
O'Donnell, Christopher J. ;
Camargo, Carlos A., Jr. ;
Gitighano, Robert P. ;
Lloyd-Jones, Donald M. .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2006, 151 (05) :1065-1071
[3]   Beta-Blocker Therapy and Cardiac Events Among Patients With Newly Diagnosed Coronary Heart Disease [J].
Andersson, Charlotte ;
Shilane, David ;
Go, Alan S. ;
Chang, Tara I. ;
Kazi, Dhruv ;
Solomon, Matthew D. ;
Boothroyd, Derek B. ;
Hlatky, Mark A. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 64 (03) :247-252
[4]  
Avis S.R., 2021, CORONARY ARTERY DIS
[5]   Coronary artery disease in the absence of traditional risk factors: a call for action [J].
Avis, Suzanne R. ;
Vernon, Stephen T. ;
Hagstrom, Emil ;
Figtree, Gemma A. .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2021, 42 (37) :3822-3824
[6]   Overview of Epidemiology and Contribution of Obesity to Cardiovascular Disease [J].
Bastien, Marjorie ;
Poirier, Paul ;
Lemieux, Isabelle ;
Despres, Jean-Pierre .
PROGRESS IN CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, 2014, 56 (04) :369-381
[7]   How are systematic reviews of prevalence conducted? A methodological study [J].
Borges Migliavaca, Celina ;
Stein, Cinara ;
Colpani, Veronica ;
Barker, Timothy Hugh ;
Munn, Zachary ;
Falavigna, Maicon .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
[8]   Comparison of Early Versus Delayed Oral β Blockers in Acute Coronary Syndromes and Effect on Outcomes [J].
Bugiardini, Raffaele ;
Cenko, Edina ;
Ricci, Beatrice ;
Vasiljevic, Zorana ;
Dorobantu, Maria ;
Kedev, Sasko ;
Vavlukis, Marija ;
Kalpak, Oliver ;
Puddu, Paolo Emilio ;
Gustiene, Olivija ;
Trninic, Dijana ;
Knezevic, Bozidarka ;
Milicic, Davor ;
Gale, Christopher P. ;
Manfrini, Olivia ;
Koller, Akos ;
Badimon, Lina .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 117 (05) :760-767
[9]   ACC/AHA Versus ESC Guidelines on Dual Antiplatelet Therapy JACC Guideline Comparison [J].
Capodanno, Davide ;
Alfonso, Fernando ;
Levine, Glenn N. ;
Valgimigli, Marco ;
Angiolillo, Dominick J. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 72 (23) :2915-2931
[10]   Conducting a meta-analysis: basics and good practices [J].
Cheung, Mike W. -L. ;
Ho, Roger C. M. ;
Lim, Yonghao ;
Mak, Anselm .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2012, 15 (02) :129-135