Evaluation of Program Costs for Implementing a Self-Determination Intervention Using the Ingredients Method

被引:2
作者
Rifenbark, Graham G. [1 ]
Hicks, Tyler A. [2 ]
Burke, Kathryn M. [3 ]
Romine, Rebecca E. Swinburne [1 ]
Fleming, Kandace K. [1 ]
Shogren, Karrie A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
[2] Univ Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
[3] Temple Univ, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
关键词
cost analysis; self-determination; intervention; economic evaluation; LEARNING-MODEL; GOAL ATTAINMENT; INSTRUCTION; IMPACT; YOUTH;
D O I
10.1177/21651434221130295
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
In this study, we estimated the cost of implementing the Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction (SDLMI), an evidence-based practice in secondary transition, at scale in 17 school districts to enhance self-determination and transition goal attainment outcomes among 340 transition-age adolescents with intellectual disability. An advantage of the SDLMI is that it can be overlaid upon any curriculum and, therefore, can minimize opportunity costs for self-determination instruction. Using the ingredients method, the current study: (a) identified and described the essential ingredients of SDLMI implementation in typical high school settings, (b) assigned and described the cost of needed ingredients, and (c) calculated a generalizable estimate of the average cost of using the SDLMI with 340 students for one school year across 17 school districts to be $40,221.26 (or $118.30 per student). We next discussed how decision-makers considering using the SDLMI in their context can minimize costs while maximizing effects on transition goal attainment outcomes. Several implications of these findings for the field of transition are also discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 141
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2020, Standards for Excellence in Education Research
  • [2] At What Cost?: Introduction to the Special Issue "Return on Investment for Academic and Behavioral Assessment and Intervention" INTRODUCTION
    Barrett, Courtenay A.
    Gadke, Daniel L.
    VanDerHeyden, Amanda M.
    [J]. SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2020, 49 (04) : 347 - 358
  • [3] Standards of Evidence for Conducting and Reporting Economic Evaluations in Prevention Science
    Crowley, D. Max
    Dodge, Kenneth A.
    Barnett, W. Steven
    Corso, Phaedra
    Duffy, Sarah
    Graham, Phillip
    Greenberg, Mark
    Haskins, Ron
    Hill, Laura
    Jones, Damon E.
    Karoly, Lynn A.
    Kuklinski, Margaret R.
    Plotnick, Robert
    [J]. PREVENTION SCIENCE, 2018, 19 (03) : 366 - 390
  • [4] Feldman R.C., 2018, COMPLEMENTARY RES ME, P281
  • [5] Hagiwara M., 2017, Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders, V1, P3, DOI [DOI 10.1007/S41252-017-0007-7, DOI 10.1177/0040059918790236]
  • [6] Hagiwara M, 2020, EDUC TRAIN AUTISM DE, V55, P17
  • [7] Hollands F.M., 2015, CostOut - the CBCSE cost tool kit
  • [8] Levin H., 2018, Economic evaluation in education cost-effectiveness and benefit-cost analysis, V3rd
  • [9] Levin H., 1983, Cost effectiveness analysis
  • [10] Levin HM., 2001, Cost-effectiveness analysis: Methods and applications, V2