The Kuwaiti Government's Twitter Discourse During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Toward a Crisis Communication Model Using SCCT and CERC

被引:0
作者
Al Nashmi, Eisa [1 ]
Bashir, Manaf [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Kuwait Univ, Dept Mass Commun, Sabah Al Salem Univ City, Kuwait, Al Asimah Gover, Kuwait
[2] Kuwait Univ, Coll Arts South, Dept Mass Commun, Sabah Al Salem Univ City, 1st Floor,Off 1012, Kuwait, Al Asimah Gover, Kuwait
关键词
Crisis Emergency Risk Communication; Situational Crisis Communication Theory; Kuwait; Covid-19; Twitter; SOCIAL MEDIA; RESPONSE STRATEGIES; REPUTATION; CORPORATE; EMERGENCY; TRUST; NEWS;
D O I
10.1177/09732586231221333
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
In an effort to de-Westernise crisis communication literature, this study explores the Kuwaiti government's COVID-19 discourse over Twitter by using criteria from Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication model (CERC) and Situational Crisis Communication Theory (SCCT). The Kuwaiti government mostly used instructing strategies, complying with crisis communication principles. However, contrary to recommendations from literature, reputation strategies were prioritised over adjusting strategies, confirming the influence of politics during crises. The results also revealed that the public interacted with instructing and adjusting strategies more than reputation strategies demonstrating the public's need for information rather than reputation. Regarding Twitter use, the results indicated that the government lacked the necessary skills to communicate proficiently over the platform. The implications of the findings are discussed in relation to theory development in crisis communication and governmental use of social media.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 178
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Abueish T., 2020, ALARABIYA ENGLISH
  • [2] Protective Behavior against COVID-19 among the Public in Kuwait: An Examination of the Protection Motivation Theory, Trust in Government, and Sociodemographic Factors
    Al-Rasheed, Malak
    [J]. SOCIAL WORK IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 35 (07) : 546 - 556
  • [3] Alsabah B., 2020, TWITTER
  • [4] Andrade E., 2020, Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research, V3, P15, DOI [DOI 10.30658/JICRCR.3.1, 10.30658/jicrcr.3.1.2, DOI 10.30658/JICRCR.3.1.2]
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2018, Crisis and emergency risk communication (CERC) manual
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2013, Childhood obesity facts
  • [7] Analysis of crisis communication by the Prime Minister of Australia during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Bernard, Natalie Reyes
    Basit, Abdul
    Sofija, Ernesta
    Phung, Hai
    Lee, Jessica
    Rutherford, Shannon
    Sebar, Bernadette
    Harris, Neil
    Phung, Dung
    Wiseman, Nicola
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2021, 62
  • [8] Public health and public trust: Survey evidence from the Ebola Virus Disease epidemic in Liberia
    Blair, Robert A.
    Morse, Benjamin S.
    Tsai, Lily L.
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2017, 172 : 89 - 97
  • [9] RESEARCHING NEWS DISCUSSION ON TWITTER New methodologies
    Bruns, Axel
    Burgess, Jean
    [J]. JOURNALISM STUDIES, 2012, 13 (5-6) : 801 - 814
  • [10] The state of social-mediated crisis communication research through the lens of global scholars: An updated assessment
    Cheng, Yang
    Wang, Yuan
    Kong, Yeqing
    [J]. PUBLIC RELATIONS REVIEW, 2022, 48 (02)