Relationships among return and liquidity of cryptocurrencies

被引:2
作者
Zhang, Mianmian [1 ]
Zhu, Bing [1 ]
Li, Ziyuan [1 ]
Jin, Siyuan [1 ,2 ]
Xia, Yong [1 ]
机构
[1] HSBC Lab China, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Business & Management, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Cryptocurrency; Liquidity; Dependence structure; Stationary; ARIMA-GARCH model; Copula model; BID-ASK SPREADS; TIME-SERIES; PRICE DISCOVERY; MARKET; DEPENDENCE; BITCOIN; RISK; LONG; CONNECTEDNESS; COMMONALITY;
D O I
10.1186/s40854-023-00532-z
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
The cryptocurrency market is a complex and rapidly evolving financial landscape in which understanding the inter- and intra-asset dependencies among key financial variables, such as return and liquidity, is crucial. In this study, we analyze daily return and liquidity data for six major cryptocurrencies, namely Bitcoin, Ethereum, Ripple, Binance Coin, Litecoin, and Dogecoin, spanning the period from June 3, 2020, to November 30, 2022. Liquidity is estimated using three low-frequency proxies: the Amihud ratio and the Abdi and Ranaldo (AR) and Corwin and Schultz (CS) estimators. To account for autoregressive and persistent effects, we apply the autoregressive integrated moving average-generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity (ARIMA-GARCH) model and subsequently utilize the copula method to examine the interdependent relationships between the return on and liquidity of the six cryptocurrencies. Our analysis reveals strong cross-asset lower-tail dependence in return and significant cross-asset upper-tail dependence in illiquidity measures, with more pronounced dependence observed in specific cryptocurrency pairs, primarily involving Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Litecoin. We also observe that returns tend to be higher when liquidity is lower in the cryptocurrency market. Our findings have significant implications for portfolio diversification, asset allocation, risk management, and trading strategy development for investors and traders, as well as regulatory policy-making for regulators. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of the cryptocurrency marketplace and can help inform investment decision making and regulatory policies in this emerging financial domain.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 122 条
[1]   A Simple Estimation of Bid-Ask Spreads from Daily Close, High, and Low Prices [J].
Abdi, Farshid ;
Ranaldo, Angelo .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2017, 30 (12) :4437-4480
[2]   Why do businesses go crypto? An empirical analysis of initial coin offerings [J].
Adhami, Saman ;
Giudici, Giancarlo ;
Martinazzi, Stefano .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 2018, 100 :64-75
[3]   What determines bitcoin liquidity? A penalized regression approach [J].
Ahmed, Walid M. A. .
APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2023, 30 (18) :2543-2554
[4]   Why cryptocurrency markets are inefficient: The impact of liquidity and volatility [J].
Al-Yahyaee, Khamis Hamed ;
Mensi, Walid ;
Ko, Hee-Un ;
Yoon, Seong-Min ;
Kang, Sang Hoon .
NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2020, 52
[5]   Portfolio Diversification, Hedge and Safe-Haven Properties in Cryptocurrency Investments and Financial Economics: A Systematic Literature Review [J].
Almeida, Jose ;
Goncalves, Tiago Cruz .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 16 (01)
[6]   Illiquidity and stock returns: cross-section and time-series effects [J].
Amihud, Y .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL MARKETS, 2002, 5 (01) :31-56
[7]  
Amihud Y., 1986, FINANC ANAL J, V43, P43, DOI [10.2469/faj.v42.n3.43, DOI 10.2469/FAJ.V42.N3.43]
[8]  
Anciaux H, 2021, SSRN Electronic Journal, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.3769309, 10.2139/ssrn.3769309, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.3769309]
[9]   Blockchain-Based ICOs: Pure Hype or the Dawn of a New Era of Startup Financing? [J].
Ante, Lennart ;
Sandner, Philipp ;
Fiedler, Ingo .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 11 (04)
[10]  
Auer R, 2022, BIS working paper no. 1013, P1