Challenges and opportunities for classroom-based formative assessment and AI: a perspective article

被引:9
作者
Hopfenbeck, Therese N. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Zhonghua [1 ]
Sun, Sundance Zhihong [1 ]
Robertson, Pam [1 ]
McGrane, Joshua A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Assessment & Evaluat Res Ctr, Grad Sch Educ, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Oxford, Kellogg Coll, Oxford, England
[3] Univ Sci & Technol, Trondheim, Norway
关键词
artificial intelligence; formative assessment; self-regulation; critical thinking; classroom based assessment; LARGE-SCALE IMPLEMENTATION; LEARNING ANALYTICS; PEER ASSESSMENT; FEEDBACK; RUBRICS; METAANALYSIS; TECHNOLOGY; MODEL;
D O I
10.3389/feduc.2023.1270700
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into educational contexts may give rise to both positive and negative ramifications for teachers' uses of formative assessment within their classrooms. Drawing on our diverse experiences as academics, researchers, psychometricians, teachers, and teacher educators specializing in formative assessment, we examine the pedagogical practices in which teachers provide feedback, facilitate peer- and self-assessments, and support students' learning, and discuss how existing challenges to each of these may be affected by applications of AI. Firstly, we overview the challenges in the practice of formative assessment independently of the influence of AI. Moreover, based on the authors' varied experience in formative assessment, we discuss the opportunities that AI brings to address the challenges in formative assessment as well as the new challenges introduced by the application of AI in formative assessment. Finally, we argue for the ongoing importance of self-regulated learning and a renewed emphasis on critical thinking for more effective implementation of formative assessment in this new AI-driven digital age.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 92 条
  • [61] Intelligent tutoring systems: a systematic review of characteristics, applications, and evaluation methods
    Mousavinasab, Elham
    Zarifsanaiey, Nahid
    R. Niakan Kalhori, Sharareh
    Rakhshan, Mahnaz
    Keikha, Leila
    Ghazi Saeedi, Marjan
    [J]. INTERACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS, 2021, 29 (01) : 142 - 163
  • [62] Murphy R.F., 2019, Technical Report PE135, DOI [10.7249/PE315, DOI 10.7249/PE315]
  • [63] Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice
    Nicol, DJ
    Macfarlane-Dick, D
    [J]. STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2006, 31 (02) : 199 - 218
  • [64] Fusing self-regulated learning and formative assessment: a roadmap of where we are, how we got here, and where we are going
    Panadero, Ernesto
    Andrade, Heidi
    Brookhart, Susan
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHER, 2018, 45 (01) : 13 - 31
  • [65] The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: A review
    Panadero, Ernesto
    Jonsson, Anders
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH REVIEW, 2013, 9 : 129 - 144
  • [66] Collaborating with teachers to design and implement assessments for self-regulated learning in the context of authentic classroom writing tasks
    Perry, Nancy E.
    Lisaingo, Simon
    Yee, Nikki
    Parent, Natasha
    Wan, Xinke
    Muis, Krista
    [J]. ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION-PRINCIPLES POLICY & PRACTICE, 2020, 27 (04) : 416 - 443
  • [67] Popham WJ, 1997, EDUC LEADERSHIP, V55, P72
  • [68] Large-scale implementation of formative assessment practices in an examination-oriented culture
    Ratnam-Lim, Christina
    Tan, Kelvin
    [J]. ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION-PRINCIPLES POLICY & PRACTICE, 2015, 22 (01) : 61 - 78
  • [69] Rozenberg O, 2015, PALGRAVE HANDBOOK OF NATIONAL PARLIAMENTS AND THE EUROPEAN UNION, P1
  • [70] Ruiz-Primo M.A., 2018, Using feedback to improve learning