Configuring alliance portfolios for digital innovation

被引:8
作者
Bockelmann, Theresa [1 ]
Werder, Karl [2 ]
Recker, Jan [1 ]
Lehmann, Julian [3 ]
Bendig, David [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hamburg, Fac Business Adm, Von Melle Pk 5, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany
[2] Univ Cologne, Cologne Inst Informat Syst, Pohligstr 1, D-50969 Cologne, Germany
[3] Arizona State Univ, WP Carey Sch Business, Dept Informat Syst, Business Adm, 300 E Lemon St, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[4] Univ Munster, Sch Business & Econ, Geiststr 26, D-48151 Munster, Germany
关键词
Alliances; Digital patents; Digital innovation; Incumbent firms; Strategic partnerships; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; MARKET VALUE; PERFORMANCE; PERSPECTIVE; COMPLEXITY; IMPACT; FIRMS; AMBIDEXTERITY; APPROPRIATION; DETERMINANTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jsis.2023.101808
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
We examine how firms configure alliance portfolios-that is, networks of partnering firms-in order to exchange, share, or codevelop the capabilities they require to engage in digital innovation. We analyze data from 550 U.S. firms and the strategic alliances they formed within and across industrial sectors to study how the configuration of alliance portfolios in terms of size, degree of exploration, internationality, and competition affects the volume and quality of digital patents. We find that alliances appear to be an effective means, yet alliances for digital innovations require a different configuration when compared with alliances for non-digital innovations. Large and explorative alliance portfolios help with the creation of digital innovations while international alliances and alliances involving competitors do not. We discuss the implications of these findings for research on digital innovation and alliances. We also distill practical advice to executives charged with making strategic decisions about inter-firm partnerships.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 109 条
  • [81] Orlikowski WJ, 2015, MIS QUART, V39, P201
  • [82] Papies D, 2017, INT SER QUAN MARKET, P581, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-53469-5_18
  • [83] PLATFORM ECOSYSTEMS: HOW DEVELOPERS INVERT THE FIRM
    Parker, Geoffrey
    Van Alstyne, Marshall
    Jiang, Xiaoyue
    [J]. MIS QUARTERLY, 2017, 41 (01) : 255 - +
  • [84] Complexity, context and governance in biotechnology alliances
    Phene, Anupama
    Tallman, Stephen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 2012, 43 (01) : 61 - 83
  • [85] WHEN ALL PRODUCTS ARE DIGITAL : COMPLEXITY AND INTANGIBLE VALUE IN THE ECOSYSTEM OF DIGITIZING FIRMS
    Rahmati, Pouya
    Tafti, Ali
    Westland, J. Christopher
    Hidalgo, Cesar
    [J]. MIS QUARTERLY, 2021, 45 (03) : 1025 - 1058
  • [86] THE EFFECT OF STRATEGIC ALLIANCES BETWEEN KEY COMPETITORS ON FIRM PERFORMANCE
    Ritala, Paavo
    Hallikas, Jukka
    Sissonen, Heli
    [J]. MANAGEMENT RESEARCH-THE JOURNAL OF THE IBEROAMERICAN ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT, 2008, 6 (03) : 179 - +
  • [87] Heterogeneity and specificity of inter-firm knowledge flows in innovation networks
    Sammarra, Alessia
    Biggiero, Lucio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2008, 45 (04) : 200 - 829
  • [88] New firms' survival and market turbulence:: New evidence from spain
    Segarra, A
    Callejón, M
    [J]. REVIEW OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2002, 20 (01) : 1 - 14
  • [89] A Temporal Perspective of Merger and Acquisition and Strategic Alliance Initiatives: Review and Future Direction
    Shi, Weilei
    Sun, Jing
    Prescott, John E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2012, 38 (01) : 164 - 209
  • [90] Simsek Z, 2005, ACAD MANAGE J, V48, P69, DOI 10.2307/20159641