Axial Compressive Behavior of Slender Circular Columns Made of Green Concrete and Double Layers of Steel and GFRP Reinforcement

被引:4
作者
Alhamaydeh, Mohammad [1 ]
Awera, Yousef [1 ]
Elkafrawy, Mohamed [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Amer Univ Sharjah, Coll Engn, Dept Civil Engn, Sharjah, U Arab Emirates
[2] Amer Univ Sharjah, Coll Arts & Sci, Coll Engn, Mat Sci & Engn Program, Sharjah, U Arab Emirates
[3] Tanta Univ, Fac Engn, Struct Engn Dept, Tanta 31733, Egypt
关键词
Axial loading; Confinement; Ductility; Glass fiber reinforced polymer; Green concrete; Slender columns; POLYMER COMPOSITES; STRENGTH; CEMENT;
D O I
10.1061/JCCOF2.CCENG-4123
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Green concrete made with ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBS) has presented itself as a sustainable alternative to traditional concrete. Similarly, the noncorroding fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) reinforcing bars have demonstrated reliable structural performance at a competitive price. The combination of these materials substantially improves the service lifespan for reinforced concrete (RC) structures. Earlier research investigations and existing standards do not account for FRP reinforcement in the design for compressive forces. This study revisits this design approach while experimentally investigating the axial compressive behavior of slender circular GGBS-based green concrete columns reinforced with double layers of steel and glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars and spirals. The experimental program consists of nine large-scale specimens loaded concentrically. All specimens had a diameter of 260 mm and a length of 2,500 mm, yielding a slenderness ratio of 38.5. Two control specimens were reinforced with a single steel layer having 1.2% and 2.5% longitudinal reinforcement ratios. The remaining seven specimens had an outer layer of GFRP reinforcement and an inner layer of steel reinforcement. The investigated parameters were: (1) longitudinal reinforcement ratio; (2) spiral reinforcement ratio; and (3) spiral reinforcement configuration (pitch and diameter). The experimental findings revealed that all tested columns failed in a material-type failure. However, the slenderness effects reduced the strength of the hybrid-reinforced columns compared with the control counterparts. The steel-reinforced control specimens demonstrated load-carrying capacities that agreed well with nominal capacity predictions under existing code. Conversely, the nominal capacity predictions in current codes and standards underestimated the strength of the hybrid specimens. A proposed equation from the literature that considers the compression contribution of GFRP bars was also evaluated, and a proposed correction factor was introduced to count for second-order effects. Due to the limited number of specimens in this study, future research is warranted to refine this proposed correction factor further.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Proposed Slenderness Limit for Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer-Reinforced Concrete Columns Based on Experiments and Buckling Analysis
    Abdelazim, Waseem
    Mohamed, Hamdy M.
    Afifi, Mohammad
    Benmokrane, Brahim
    [J]. ACI STRUCTURAL JOURNAL, 2020, 117 (01) : 241 - 254
  • [2] Abdulkatib W., 2016, Master of Science thesis
  • [3] ACI, 2022, ACI 440.11-22, P1
  • [4] Axial Capacity of Circular Concrete Columns Reinforced with GFRP Bars and Spirals
    Afifi, Mohammad Z.
    Mohamed, Hamdy M.
    Benmokrane, Brahim
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPOSITES FOR CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 18 (01)
  • [5] Aghdam K.A., 2018, J. Constr. Eng. Proj. Manag, V8, P1, DOI [10.6106/JCEPM.2018.8.3.001, DOI 10.6106/JCEPM.2018.8.3.001]
  • [6] Evaluation of FRP Bars under Compression and Their Performance in RC Columns
    AlNajmi, Laith
    Abed, Farid
    [J]. MATERIALS, 2020, 13 (20) : 1 - 19
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2019, ACI 318-19, P1
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2021, Standard test method for accelerated leach test for measuring contaminant releases from solidified waste, P1
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2012, Design and Construction of Building Structures with Fiber-Reinforced Polymers CAN/CSA S806-12
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2016, STANDARD TEST METHOD, P1, DOI [10.1520/C1202-12.2, DOI 10.1520/E0384-17, DOI 10.1520/C1202-12.2]