Efficiency traps beyond the climate crisis: exploration-exploitation trade-offs and rebound effects

被引:6
作者
Segovia-Martin, Jose [1 ,2 ]
Creutzig, Felix [3 ,4 ]
Winters, James [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] M6 Polytech Univ SCI UM6P, Sch Collect Intelligence, Rabat 11103, Morocco
[2] Complex Syst Inst Paris Ile de France ISCPIF CNRS, F-75013 Paris, France
[3] Mercator Res Inst Global Commons & Climate Change, D-10829 Berlin, Germany
[4] Tech Univ Berlin, D-10623 Berlin, Germany
[5] Brunel Univ London, Dept Psychol, Ctr Culture & Evolut, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, England
关键词
climate change; reinforcement learning; environmental economics; indirect rebound effect; consumption; economic growth; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; US HOUSEHOLDS; CO2; EMISSIONS; CONSUMPTION; CONSERVATION; RECYCLE;
D O I
10.1098/rstb.2022.0405
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Higher levels of economic activity are often accompanied by higher energy use and consumption of natural resources. As fossil fuels still account for 80% of the global energy mix, energy consumption remains closely linked to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and thus to climate change. Under the assumption of sufficiently elastic demand, this reality of global economic development based on permanent growth of economic activity, brings into play the Jevons Paradox, which hypothesises that increases in the efficiency of resource use leads to increases in resource consumption. Previous research on the rebound effects has limitations, including a lack of studies on the connection between reinforcement learning and environmental consequences. This paper develops a mathematical model and computer simulator to study the effects of micro-level exploration-exploitation strategies on efficiency, consumption and sustainability, considering different levels of direct and indirect rebound effects. Our model shows how optimal exploration-exploitation strategies for increasing efficiency can lead to unsustainable development patterns if they are not accompanied by demand reduction measures, which are essential for mitigating climate change. Moreover, our paper speaks to the broader issue of efficiency traps by highlighting how indirect rebound effects not only affect primary energy (PE) consumption and GHG emissions, but also resource consumption in other domains. By linking these issues together, our study sheds light on the complexities and interdependencies involved in achieving sustainable development goals.This article is part of the theme issue 'Climate change adaptation needs a science of culture'.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   Review of fossil fuels and future energy technologies [J].
Abas, N. ;
Kalair, A. ;
Khan, N. .
FUTURES, 2015, 69 :31-49
[2]   Green consumption-no solution for climate change [J].
Alfredsson, EC .
ENERGY, 2004, 29 (04) :513-524
[3]   Consumer End-Use Energy Efficiency and Rebound Effects [J].
Azevedo, Ines M. L. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, VOL 39, 2014, 39 :393-418
[4]  
Bajzelj B, 2014, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V4, P924, DOI [10.1038/NCLIMATE2353, 10.1038/nclimate2353]
[5]   The Exploration-Exploitation Dilemma: A Multidisciplinary Framework [J].
Berger-Tal, Oded ;
Nathan, Jonathan ;
Meron, Ehud ;
Saltz, David .
PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (04)
[6]   Technological progress and sustainable development: what about the rebound effect? [J].
Binswanger, M .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2001, 36 (01) :119-132
[7]   A Meta-Analytic Review of Moral Licensing [J].
Blanken, Irene ;
van de Ven, Niels ;
Zeelenberg, Marcel .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2015, 41 (04) :540-558
[8]   Increased energy efficiency and the rebound effect:: Effects on consumption and emissions [J].
Brannlund, Runar ;
Ghalwash, Tarek ;
Nordstrom, Jonas .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2007, 29 (01) :1-17
[9]   International comparison of resource use and its relation to economic growth -: The development of total material requirement, direct material inputs and hidden flows and the structure of TMR [J].
Bringezu, S ;
Schütz, H ;
Steger, S ;
Baudisch, J .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2004, 51 (1-2) :97-124
[10]  
Buhl J., 2016, Rethinking Climate and Energy Policies, P37, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-38807-6_3