Quality indicators in Barrett's endoscopy: Best is yet to come

被引:2
作者
Inoue, Madoka [1 ,2 ]
Ragunath, Krish [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Curtin Univ, Curtin Med Sch, Perth, Australia
[2] Royal Perth Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Perth, Australia
[3] Curtin Univ, Curtin Med Sch, Kent St, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia
关键词
Barrett's esophagus; endoscopy; narrative review; quality indicator; CLINICAL-PRACTICE UPDATE; ESOPHAGEAL ADENOCARCINOMA; GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY; EUROPEAN-SOCIETY; GRADE DYSPLASIA; MANAGEMENT; DIAGNOSIS; SURVEILLANCE; MAGNITUDE; CANCER;
D O I
10.1111/den.14654
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
There is growing interest in establishing quality indicators (QIs) for endoscopic screening and surveillance in Barrett's esophagus (BE). QIs are objective, measurable, and evidence-based metrics that are applicable in a health-care setting to monitor a process and identify key performance indicators (KPIs) to achieve defined goals. In the Barrett's endoscopy setting, QIs can offer a standardized approach to monitor and maintain high-quality endoscopy for BE screening and surveillance that will allow measuring performance of an endoscopist as an individual, a group, or a facility. Since BE is an endoscopically identifiable premalignant condition with histological corroboration, adherence to QIs is paramount for the early and accurate detection of dysplasia and neoplasia. It is the holy grail for BE screening and surveillance. Although several suggested QIs for Barrett's endoscopy exist, issues remain in determining the most appropriate ones. These issues include inconsistent use of terminology, unclear definitions, and a scarcity of studies linking these QIs with relevant patient outcomes, making it difficult for clinicians to understand the concept and clinical importance. Hence, there is an urgent need to determine what should constitute appropriate QIs for Barrett's endoscopy, clearly define items used in the QIs, and identify ways to measure these KPIs. Ultimately, well-defined and validated QIs will contribute to clinically effective, safe, timely, and patient-focused care. In this review, we summarize recent literature and discuss four proposed QIs: (i) neoplasia detection rate; (ii) postendoscopy Barrett's neoplasia; (iii) Barrett's inspection time; and (iv) adherence to the Seattle biopsy protocol.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 273
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Abela JE, 2008, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V103, P2402, DOI 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01746.x
[2]   Predicting the Future Burden of Esophageal Cancer by Histological Subtype: International Trends in Incidence up to 2030 [J].
Arnold, Melina ;
Laversanne, Mathieu ;
Brown, Linda Morris ;
Devesa, Susan S. ;
Bray, Freddie .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2017, 112 (08) :1247-1255
[3]   Understanding heterogeneity in meta-analysis: the role of meta-regression [J].
Baker, W. L. ;
White, C. Michael ;
Cappelleri, J. C. ;
Kluger, J. ;
Coleman, C. I. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2009, 63 (10) :1426-1434
[4]   An Interactive Web-Based Educational Tool Improves Detection and Delineation of Barrett's Esophagus-Related Neoplasia [J].
Bergman, Jacques J. G. H. M. ;
De Groof, A. Jeroen ;
Pech, O. ;
Ragunath, K. ;
Armstrong, D. ;
Mostafavi, N. ;
Lundell, L. ;
Dent, J. ;
Vieth, M. ;
Tytgat, G. N. ;
Sharma, P. .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 156 (05) :1299-+
[5]   Performance measures for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: A European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy quality improvement initiative [J].
Bisschops, Raf ;
Areia, Miguel ;
Coron, Emmanuel ;
Dobru, Daniela ;
Kaskas, Bernd ;
Kuvaev, Roman ;
Pech, Oliver ;
Ragunath, Krish ;
Weusten, Bas ;
Familiari, Pietro ;
Domagk, Dirk ;
Valori, Roland ;
Kaminski, Michal F. ;
Spada, Cristiano ;
Bretthauer, Michael ;
Bennett, Cathy ;
Senore, Carlo ;
Dinis-Ribeiro, Mario ;
Rutter, Matthew D. .
UNITED EUROPEAN GASTROENTEROLOGY JOURNAL, 2016, 4 (05) :629-656
[6]   Dedicated service improves the accuracy of Barrett's oesophagus surveillance: a prospective comparative cohort study [J].
Britton, James ;
Chatten, Kelly ;
Riley, Tom ;
Keld, Richard R. ;
Hamdy, Shaheen ;
McLaughlin, John ;
Ang, Yeng .
FRONTLINE GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 10 (02) :128-134
[7]   Low-Grade Dysplasia in Barrett's Esophagus: Overdiagnosed and Underestimated [J].
Curvers, Wouter L. ;
ten Kate, Fiebo J. ;
Krishnadath, Kausilia K. ;
Visser, Mike ;
Elzer, Brenda ;
Baak, Lubertus C. ;
Bohmer, Clarisse ;
Mallant-Hent, Rosalie C. ;
van Oijen, Arnout ;
Naber, Anton H. ;
Scholten, Pieter ;
Busch, Olivier R. ;
Blaauwgeers, Harriet G. T. ;
Meijer, Gerrit A. ;
Bergman, Jacques J. G. H. M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2010, 105 (07) :1523-1530
[8]   Deep-Learning System Detects Neoplasia in Patients With Barrett's Esophagus With Higher Accuracy Than Endoscopists in a Multistep Training and Validation Study With Benchmarking [J].
de Groof, Albert J. ;
Struyvenberg, Maarten R. ;
van der Putten, Joost ;
van der Sommen, Fons ;
Fockens, Kiki N. ;
Curvers, Wouter L. ;
Zinger, Sveta ;
Pouw, Roos E. ;
Coron, Emmanuel ;
Baldaque-Silva, Francisco ;
Pech, Oliver ;
Weusten, Bas ;
Meining, Alexander ;
Neuhaus, Horst ;
Bisschops, Raf ;
Dent, John ;
Schoon, Erik J. ;
de With, Peter H. ;
Bergman, Jacques J. .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 158 (04) :915-+
[9]   Post-endoscopy Barrett's neoplasia after a negative index endoscopy: a systematic review and proposal for definitions and performance measures in endoscopy [J].
Desai, Madhav ;
Lieberman, David ;
Srinivasan, Sachin ;
Nutalapati, Venkat ;
Challa, Abhishek ;
Kalgotra, Pankush ;
Sundaram, Suneha ;
Repici, Alessandro ;
Hassan, Cesare ;
Kaminski, Michal F. ;
Sharma, Prateek .
ENDOSCOPY, 2022, 54 (09) :881-889
[10]   What Quality Metrics Should We Apply in Barrett's Esophagus? [J].
Desai, Madhav ;
Sharma, Prateek .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 114 (08) :1197-1198