A Systematic Review of Mesenchymal Epithelial Transition Factor (MET) and Its Impact in the Development and Treatment of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

被引:3
作者
Boden, Embla [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Svereus, Fanny [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Olm, Franziska [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Lindstedt, Sandra [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Dept Clin Sci, S-22184 Lund, Sweden
[2] Lund Univ, Wallenberg Ctr Mol Med, S-22184 Lund, Sweden
[3] Lund Univ, Lund Stem Cell Ctr, S-22184 Lund, Sweden
[4] Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiothorac Surg & Transplantat, S-22242 Lund, Sweden
关键词
non-small cell lung cancer; mesenchymal epithelial transition factor; MET; targeted therapies; genetic alterations; biomarker; systematic review; GROWTH-FACTOR RECEPTOR; PHASE-III TRIAL; C-MET; OPEN-LABEL; ERLOTINIB; COMBINATION; ONARTUZUMAB; CRIZOTINIB; CHEMOTHERAPY; MULTICENTER;
D O I
10.3390/cancers15153827
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Simple Summary Lung cancer is the type of cancer that kills the most people in the world each year. It is difficult to diagnose lung cancer in the early stages and there are only few treatment options available once the cancer has spread. The mesenchymal epithelial transition factor (MET) gene is of importance in lung cancer development, and mutations in this gene are related to poor prognosis. Consequently, it is important to develop new treatment options that specifically target the MET protein. In this systematic review, we aimed to summarize the existing knowledge on the impact of MET on lung cancer development and the effect of currently available medications. Our hope is that the findings of this systematic review will deepen the understanding of other researchers, possibly providing a guiding hand as to what may be most interesting to focus on in future research projects on this subject. Lung cancer represents the leading cause of annual cancer-related deaths worldwide, accounting for 12.9%. The available treatment options for patients who experience disease progression remain limited. Targeted therapeutic approaches are promising but further understanding of the role of genetic alterations in tumorigenesis is imperative. The MET gene has garnered great interest in this regard. The aim of this systematic review was to analyze the findings from multiple studies to provide a comprehensive and unbiased summary of the evidence. A systematic search was conducted in the reputable scientific databases Embase and PubMed, leading to the inclusion of twenty-two articles, following the PRISMA guidelines, elucidating the biological role of MET in lung cancer and targeted therapies. The systematic review was registered in PROSPERO with registration ID: CRD42023437714. MET mutations were detected in 7.6-11.0% of cases while MET gene amplification was observed in 3.9-22.0%. Six studies showed favorable treatment outcomes utilizing MET inhibitors compared to standard treatment or placebo, with increases in PFS and OS ranging from 0.9 to 12.4 and 7.2 to 24.2 months, respectively, and one study reporting an increase in ORR by 17.3%. Furthermore, patients with a higher mutational burden may derive greater benefit from treatment with MET tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) than those with a lower mutational burden. Conversely, two studies reported no beneficial effect from adjunctive treatment with a MET targeted therapy. Given these findings, there is an urgent need to identify effective therapeutic strategies specifically targeting the MET gene in lung cancer patients.
引用
收藏
页数:34
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Novel drugs against non-small-cell lung cancer
    Pirker, Robert
    CURRENT OPINION IN ONCOLOGY, 2014, 26 (02) : 145 - 151
  • [32] Clinical utility of ramucirumab in non-small-cell lung cancer
    Uprety, Dipesh
    BIOLOGICS-TARGETS & THERAPY, 2019, 13 : 133 - 137
  • [33] The Role of MET Inhibitor Therapies in the Treatment of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
    De Mello, Ramon Andrade
    Neves, Nathalia Moises
    Amaral, Giovanna Araujo
    Lippo, Estela Gudin
    Castelo-Branco, Pedro
    Pozza, Daniel Humberto
    Tajima, Carla Chizuru
    Antoniou, Georgios
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (06) : 1 - 16
  • [34] Epithelial Mesenchymal Transition and its Roles on Chemoresistance in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
    CHEN Yunqing
    WANG Jin
    XIANG Fenggang
    LI Min
    LI Hong
    WU Qi
    SUN Fengchun
    科教导刊(上旬刊), 2014, (04) : 188 - 190
  • [35] A Systematic Review and Canadian Consensus Recommendations on the Use of Biomarkers in the Treatment of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
    Ellis, Peter M.
    Blais, Normand
    Soulieres, Dennis
    Ionescu, Diana N.
    Kashyap, Meenakshi
    Liu, Geoff
    Melosky, Barb
    Reiman, Tony
    Romeo, Phillippe
    Shepherd, Frances A.
    Tsao, Ming-Sound
    Leighl, Natasha B.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2011, 6 (08) : 1379 - 1391
  • [36] Efficacy of targeted agents in the treatment of elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Jianqing
    Chen, Jianbo
    Wu, Xiaoan
    Shi, Tao
    Kang, Meiling
    ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY, 2016, 9 : 4797 - 4803
  • [37] Impact of Genetic Markers on Treatment of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
    Lamparella, Nicholas
    Barochia, Amit
    Almokadem, Salah
    IMPACT OF GENETIC TARGETS ON CANCER THERAPY, 2013, 779 : 145 - 164
  • [38] Erlotinib and pemetrexed as maintenance therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and indirect comparison
    Qi, Wei-Xiang
    Tang, Li-na
    He, Ai-na
    Shen, Zan
    Lin, Feng
    Yao, Yang
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2012, 28 (04) : 643 - 650
  • [39] Comparison between immunotherapy efficacy in early non-small cell lung cancer and advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review
    Wang, Yimin
    Li, Chuling
    Wang, Zimu
    Wang, Zhaofeng
    Wu, Ranpu
    Wu, Ying
    Song, Yong
    Liu, Hongbing
    BMC MEDICINE, 2022, 20 (01)
  • [40] Patients' preferences for chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer: A systematic review
    Blinman, Prunella
    Alam, Mahmood
    Duric, Vlatka
    McLachlan, Sue-Anne
    Stockler, Martin R.
    LUNG CANCER, 2010, 69 (02) : 141 - 147