The Clinical Suitability of an Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Pain Assessment Tool for Use in Infants: Feasibility and Usability Evaluation Study

被引:6
|
作者
Hughes, Jeffery David [1 ]
Chivers, Paola [2 ,3 ]
Hoti, Kreshnik [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Curtin Univ, Curtin Med Sch, Perth, Australia
[2] Univ Notre Dame Australia, Inst Hlth Res, Fremantle, Australia
[3] Edith Cowan Univ, Sch Med & Hlth Sci, Perth, Australia
[4] Univ Prishtina, Fac Med, Prishtina, Kosovo
[5] Univ Prishtina, Fac Med, 31 George Bush St, Prishtina 10000, Kosovo
关键词
pain assessment; clinical utility; sensitivity; specificity; immunization; accuracy; precision; PainChek Infant; infant; newborn; baby; babies; pain; facial; artificial intelligence; machine learning; model; detection; assessment; FACIAL-EXPRESSION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; YOUNG-CHILDREN; VALIDITY; CIRCUMCISION; RELIABILITY; IMMEDIATE; PARENTS; FACE;
D O I
10.2196/41992
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Infants are unable to self-report their pain, which, therefore, often goes underrecognized and undertreated. Adequate assessment of pain, including procedural pain, which has short- and long-term consequences, is critical for its management. The introduction of mobile health-based (mHealth) pain assessment tools could address current challenges and is an area requiring further research. Objective: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy and feasibility aspects of PainChek Infant and, therefore, assess its applicability in the intended setting. Methods: By observing infants just before, during, and after immunization, we evaluated the accuracy and precision at different cutoff scores of PainChek Infant, which is a point-of-care mHealth-based solution that uses artificial intelligence to detect pain and intensity based solely on facial expression. We used receiver operator characteristic analysis to assess interpretability and establish a cutoff score. Clinician comprehensibility was evaluated using a standardized questionnaire. Other feasibility aspects were evaluated based on comparison with currently available observational pain assessment tools for use in infants with procedural pain. Results: Both PainChek Infant Standard and Adaptive modes demonstrated high accuracy (area under the curve 0.964 and 0.966, respectively). At a cutoff score of >= 2, accuracy and precision were 0.908 and 0.912 for Standard and 0.912 and 0.897 for Adaptive modes, respectively. Currently available data allowed evaluation of 16 of the 17 feasibility aspects, with only the cost of the outcome measurement instrument unable to be evaluated since it is yet to be determined. PainChek Infant performed well across feasibility aspects, including interpretability (cutoff score defined), ease of administration, completion time (3 seconds), and clinician comprehensibility. Conclusions: This work provides information on the feasibility of using PainChek Infant in clinical practice for procedural pain assessment and monitoring, and demonstrates the accuracy and precision of the tool at the defined cutoff score.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [21] A Combination of Artificial Intelligence with Genetic Algorithms on Static Time-Lapse Images Improves Consistency in Blastocyst Assessment, An Interpretable Tool to Automate Human Embryo Evaluation: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Toschi, Marco
    Bori, Lorena
    Rocha, Jose Celso
    Hickman, Cristina
    Nogueira, Marcelo Fabio Gouveia
    Ferreira, Andre Satoshi
    Maffeis, Murilo Costa
    Malmsten, Jonas
    Zhan, Qiansheng
    Zaninovic, Nikica
    Meseguer, Marcos
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FERTILITY & STERILITY, 2024, 18 (04) : 378 - 383
  • [22] Impact of artificial intelligence in managing musculoskeletal pathologies in physiatry: a qualitative observational study evaluating the potential use of ChatGPT versus Copilot for patient information and clinical advice on low back pain
    Ah-Yan, Christophe
    Boissonnault, Eve
    Boudier-Reveret, Mathieu
    Mares, Christopher
    JOURNAL OF YEUNGNAM MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2025, 42
  • [23] Re-engineering the clinical approach to suspected cardiac chest pain assessment in the emergency department by expediting research evidence to practice using artificial intelligence. (RAPIDx AI)-a cluster randomized study design
    Khan, Ehsan
    Lambrakis, Kristina
    Briffa, Tom
    Cullen, Louise A.
    Karnon, Jonathon
    Papendick, Cynthia
    Quinn, Stephen
    Tideman, Phil
    van den Hengel, Anton
    Verjans, Johan
    Chew, Derek P.
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2025, 285 : 106 - 118