Improved Performance of PET Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Compared to SPECT in the Evaluation of Suspected CAD

被引:7
作者
Alam, Loba [1 ,2 ]
Omar, Alaa Mabrouk Salem [1 ,2 ]
Patel, Krishna K. K. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Morningside, Dept Cardiol, New York, NY 10025 USA
[2] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, New York, NY USA
[3] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Populat Hlth Sci & Policy, New York, NY 10029 USA
关键词
Positron emission tomography; Myocardial perfusion imaging; Myocardial blood flow; Coronary artery disease; Microvascular disease; Single photon emission computed tomography; CORONARY-ARTERY-DISEASE; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; IMPAIRED CHRONOTROPIC RESPONSE; TREADMILL EXERCISE SCORE; SYSTOLIC BLOOD-PRESSURE; ALL-CAUSE MORTALITY; PROGNOSTIC VALUE; FLOW RESERVE; MICROVASCULAR DYSFUNCTION; SURVIVAL BENEFIT;
D O I
10.1007/s11886-023-01851-4
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose of ReviewMyocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) with single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) has played a central role in the non-invasive evaluation of patients with obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) for decades. In this review, we discuss the key differences and advantages of positron emission tomography (PET) MPI over SPECT MPI as it relates to the diagnosis, prognosis, as well as clinical decision-making in patients with suspected CAD.Recent FindingsStress-induced perfusion abnormalities on SPECT help estimate presence, extent, and location of ischemia and flow-limiting obstructive CAD, help with risk stratification, and serve as a gatekeeper to identify patients who will benefit from downstream revascularization versus medical management. Some of the major limitations of SPECT include soft-tissue attenuation artifacts, underestimation of ischemia due to reliance on relative perfusion assessment, and longer protocols with higher radiation dose when performed with traditional equipment. PET MPI addresses most of these limitations and offers better quality images, higher diagnostic accuracy along with shorter protocols and lower radiation dose to the patient. A special advantage of PET scanning lies in the ability to quantify absolute myocardial blood flow and assess true extent of epicardial involvement along with identifying non-obstructive phenotypes of CAD such as diffuse atherosclerosis and microvascular dysfunction. In addition, stress acquisition at/near peak stress with PET allows us to measure left ventricular ejection fraction reserve and myocardial blood flow reserve, which help with identifying patients at a higher risk of future cardiac events and optimally select candidates for revascularization.The several technical advantages of PET MPI position as a superior method to diagnose obstructive and non-obstructive phenotypes of ischemic heart disease affecting the entirety of the coronary circulation offer incremental value for risk stratification and guide post-test management strategy for patients with suspected CAD.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 293
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Performance evaluation of a pinhole SPECT system for myocardial perfusion imaging of mice
    Wu, MC
    Hasegawa, BH
    Dae, MW
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (12) : 2830 - 2839
  • [32] Methodology for quantiying absolute myocardial perfusion with PET and SPECT
    Lodge M.A.
    Bengel F.M.
    Current Cardiology Reports, 2007, 9 (2) : 121 - 128
  • [33] Solid-State Detector SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
    Slomka, Piotr J.
    Miller, Robert J. H.
    Hu, Lien-Hsin
    Germano, Guido
    Berman, Daniel S.
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2019, 60 (09) : 1194 - 1204
  • [34] A randomized trial of exercise treadmill ECG versus stress SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging as an initial diagnostic strategy in stable patients with chest pain and suspected CAD: Cost analysis
    Nikant K. Sabharwal
    Boyka Stoykova
    Anil K. Taneja
    Avijit Lahiri
    Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, 2007, 14
  • [35] Classification models for SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging
    Berkaya, Selcan Kaplan
    Sivrikoz, Ilknur Ak
    Gunal, Serkan
    COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2020, 123
  • [36] A randomized trial of exercise treadmill ECG versus stress SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging as an initial diagnostic strategy in stable patients with chest pain and suspected CAD: Cost analysis
    Sabharwal, Nikant K.
    Stoykova, Boyka
    Taneja, Anil K.
    Lahiri, Avijit
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY, 2007, 14 (02) : 174 - 186
  • [37] Improved myocardial blood flow estimation with residual activity correction and motion correction in 18F-flurpiridaz PET myocardial perfusion imaging
    Otaki, Yuka
    Van Kriekinge, Serge D.
    Wei, Chih-Chun
    Kavanagh, Paul
    Singh, Ananya
    Parekh, Tejas
    Di Carli, Marcelo
    Maddahi, Jamshid
    Sitek, Arkadiusz
    Buckley, Christopher
    Berman, Daniel S.
    Slomka, Piotr J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2022, 49 (06) : 1881 - 1893
  • [38] Appropriate Use Criteria for PET Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
    Schindler, Thomas H.
    Bateman, Timothy M.
    Berman, Daniel S.
    Chareonthaitawee, Panithaya
    De Blanche, Lorraine E.
    Dilsizian, Vasken
    Dorbala, Sharmila
    Gropler, Robert J.
    Shaw, Leslee
    Soman, Prem
    Winchester, David E.
    Verberne, Hein
    Ahuja, Sukhjeet
    Beanlands, Rob S.
    Di Carli, Marcelo F.
    Murthy, Venkatesh L.
    Ruddy, Terrence D.
    Schwartz, Ronald G.
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2020, 61 (08) : 1221 - 1265
  • [39] Prospective multicenter evaluation of rapid, gated SPECT myocardial perfusion upright imaging
    Maddahi, Jamshid
    Mendez, Ricardo
    Mahmarian, John J.
    Thomas, Gregory
    Babla, Hetal
    Bai, Chuanyong
    Arram, Samia
    Maffetone, Peter
    Conwell, Richard
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 16 (03) : 351 - 357
  • [40] Prospective multicenter evaluation of rapid, gated SPECT myocardial perfusion upright imaging
    Jamshid Maddahi
    Ricardo Mendez
    John J. Mahmarian
    Gregory Thomas
    Hetal Babla
    Chuanyong Bai
    Samia Arram
    Peter Maffetone
    Richard Conwell
    Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, 2009, 16 : 351 - 357