Improved Performance of PET Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Compared to SPECT in the Evaluation of Suspected CAD

被引:7
|
作者
Alam, Loba [1 ,2 ]
Omar, Alaa Mabrouk Salem [1 ,2 ]
Patel, Krishna K. K. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Morningside, Dept Cardiol, New York, NY 10025 USA
[2] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, New York, NY USA
[3] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Populat Hlth Sci & Policy, New York, NY 10029 USA
关键词
Positron emission tomography; Myocardial perfusion imaging; Myocardial blood flow; Coronary artery disease; Microvascular disease; Single photon emission computed tomography; CORONARY-ARTERY-DISEASE; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; IMPAIRED CHRONOTROPIC RESPONSE; TREADMILL EXERCISE SCORE; SYSTOLIC BLOOD-PRESSURE; ALL-CAUSE MORTALITY; PROGNOSTIC VALUE; FLOW RESERVE; MICROVASCULAR DYSFUNCTION; SURVIVAL BENEFIT;
D O I
10.1007/s11886-023-01851-4
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose of ReviewMyocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) with single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) has played a central role in the non-invasive evaluation of patients with obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) for decades. In this review, we discuss the key differences and advantages of positron emission tomography (PET) MPI over SPECT MPI as it relates to the diagnosis, prognosis, as well as clinical decision-making in patients with suspected CAD.Recent FindingsStress-induced perfusion abnormalities on SPECT help estimate presence, extent, and location of ischemia and flow-limiting obstructive CAD, help with risk stratification, and serve as a gatekeeper to identify patients who will benefit from downstream revascularization versus medical management. Some of the major limitations of SPECT include soft-tissue attenuation artifacts, underestimation of ischemia due to reliance on relative perfusion assessment, and longer protocols with higher radiation dose when performed with traditional equipment. PET MPI addresses most of these limitations and offers better quality images, higher diagnostic accuracy along with shorter protocols and lower radiation dose to the patient. A special advantage of PET scanning lies in the ability to quantify absolute myocardial blood flow and assess true extent of epicardial involvement along with identifying non-obstructive phenotypes of CAD such as diffuse atherosclerosis and microvascular dysfunction. In addition, stress acquisition at/near peak stress with PET allows us to measure left ventricular ejection fraction reserve and myocardial blood flow reserve, which help with identifying patients at a higher risk of future cardiac events and optimally select candidates for revascularization.The several technical advantages of PET MPI position as a superior method to diagnose obstructive and non-obstructive phenotypes of ischemic heart disease affecting the entirety of the coronary circulation offer incremental value for risk stratification and guide post-test management strategy for patients with suspected CAD.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 293
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Improved Performance of PET Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Compared to SPECT in the Evaluation of Suspected CAD
    Loba Alam
    Alaa Mabrouk Salem Omar
    Krishna K. Patel
    Current Cardiology Reports, 2023, 25 : 281 - 293
  • [2] SPECT Versus PET Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Patients with Equivocal CT
    Singh, Vasvi
    Di Carli, Marcelo F.
    CURRENT CARDIOLOGY REPORTS, 2020, 22 (06)
  • [3] Future of Radionuclide Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: Transitioning from SPECT to PET
    Di Carli, Marcelo F.
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2023, 64 : 3S - 10S
  • [4] Myocardial perfusion imaging with PET
    Driessen, Roel S.
    Raijmakers, Pieter G.
    Stuijfzand, Wijnand J.
    Knaapen, Paul
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2017, 33 (07) : 1021 - 1031
  • [5] SPECT/PET myocardial perfusion imaging versus coronary CT angiography in patients with known or suspected CAD
    Berman, D. S.
    Shaw, L. J.
    Min, J. K.
    Hachamovitch, R.
    Abidov, A.
    Germano, G.
    Hayes, S. W.
    Friedman, J. D.
    Thomson, L. E. J.
    Kang, X.
    Slomka, P.
    Rozanski, A.
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2010, 54 (02) : 177 - 200
  • [6] Review: comparison of PET rubidium-82 with conventional SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging
    Ghotbi, Adam A.
    Kjaer, Andreas
    Hasbak, Philip
    CLINICAL PHYSIOLOGY AND FUNCTIONAL IMAGING, 2014, 34 (03) : 163 - 170
  • [7] PET myocardial perfusion imaging: Trends, challenges, and opportunities
    Dahdal, Jorge
    Jukema, Ruurt A.
    Harms, Hendrik J.
    Cramer, Maarten J.
    Raijmakers, Pieter G.
    Knaapen, Paul
    Danad, Ibrahim
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 40
  • [8] PET and SPECT Tracers for Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
    Klein, Ran
    Celiker-Guler, Emel
    Rotstein, Benjamin H.
    deKemp, Robert A.
    SEMINARS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2020, 50 (03) : 208 - 218
  • [9] PET should replace SPECT in cardiac imaging for diagnosis and risk assessment of patients with known or suspected CAD: Pro
    Maddahi, Jamshid
    Packard, Rene R. Sevag
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 24 (06) : 1955 - 1959
  • [10] Myocardial Perfusion Imaging for the Evaluation of Ischemic Heart Disease in Women
    Campisi, Roxana
    Marengo, Fernando D.
    CURRENT CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING REPORTS, 2019, 12 (01)