A critique of a variety of "memory-based" process monitoring methods

被引:45
作者
Knoth, Sven [1 ]
Saleh, Nesma A. [2 ]
Mahmoud, Mahmoud A. [2 ]
Woodall, William H. [3 ]
Tercero-Gomez, Victor G. [4 ]
机构
[1] Helmut Schmidt Univ, Math & Stat, Hamburg, Germany
[2] Cairo Univ, Giza, Egypt
[3] Virginia Tech, Stat, Blacksburg, VA USA
[4] Tecnol Monterrey, Sch Engn & Sci, Monterrey, Mexico
关键词
Control chart; cumulative sum (CUSUM) chart; exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) chart; mixed control charts; statistical process monitoring; WEIGHTED MOVING AVERAGE; CUSUM CONTROL CHART; EWMA CONTROL CHART; SHEWHART CONTROL CHARTS; DEWMA CONTROL CHART; RUN-LENGTH; SUM; PERFORMANCE; LOCATION; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1080/00224065.2022.2034487
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Many extensions and modifications have been made to standard process monitoring methods such as the exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) chart and the cumulative sum (CUSUM) chart. In addition, new schemes have been proposed based on alternative weighting of past data, usually to put greater emphasis on past data and less weight on current and recent data. In other cases, the output of one process monitoring method, such as the EWMA statistic, is used as the input to another method, such as the CUSUM chart. Often the recursive formula for a control chart statistic is itself used recursively to form a new control chart statistic. We find the use of these ad hoc methods to be unjustified. Statistical performance comparisons justifying the use of these methods have been either flawed by focusing only on zero-state run length metrics or by making comparisons to an unnecessarily weak competitor.
引用
收藏
页码:18 / 42
页数:25
相关论文
共 181 条
  • [11] On developing an exponentially weighted moving average chart under progressive setup: An efficient approach to manufacturing processes
    Abbas, Zameer
    Nazir, Hafiz Zafar
    Akhtar, Noureen
    Riaz, Muhammad
    Abid, Muhammad
    [J]. QUALITY AND RELIABILITY ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 36 (07) : 2569 - 2591
  • [12] An enhanced approach for the progressive mean control charts
    Abbas, Zameer
    Nazir, Hafiz Zafar
    Akhtar, Noureen
    Riaz, Muhammad
    Abid, Muhammad
    [J]. QUALITY AND RELIABILITY ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 35 (04) : 1046 - 1060
  • [13] Enhancing the performance of CUSUM scale chart
    Abbasi, Saddam Akber
    Riaz, Muhammad
    Miller, Arden
    [J]. COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2012, 63 (02) : 400 - 409
  • [14] Double EWMA-Based Polynomial Quality Profiles Monitoring
    Abdella, Galal M.
    Kim, Jinho
    Al-Khalifa, Khalifa N.
    Hamouda, Abdel Magid
    [J]. QUALITY AND RELIABILITY ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 32 (08) : 2639 - 2652
  • [15] A mixed cumulative sum homogeneously weighted moving average control chart for monitoring process mean
    Abid, Muhammad
    Mei, Sun
    Nazir, Hafiz Zafar
    Riaz, Muhammad
    Hussain, Shahid
    Abbas, Zameer
    [J]. QUALITY AND RELIABILITY ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 37 (05) : 1758 - 1771
  • [16] A mixed HWMA-CUSUM mean chart with an application to manufacturing process
    Abid, Muhammad
    Mei, Sun
    Nazir, Hafiz Zafar
    Riaz, Muhammad
    Hussain, Shahid
    [J]. QUALITY AND RELIABILITY ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 37 (02) : 618 - 631
  • [17] A double homogeneously weighted moving average control chart for monitoring of the process mean
    Abid, Muhammad
    Shabbir, Aroosa
    Nazir, Hafiz Zafar
    Sherwani, Rehan Ahmed Khan
    Riaz, Muhammad
    [J]. QUALITY AND RELIABILITY ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 36 (05) : 1513 - 1527
  • [18] In-control robustness comparison of different control charts
    Abid, Muhammad
    Nazir, Hafiz Zafar
    Riaz, Muhammad
    Lin, Zhengyan
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE INSTITUTE OF MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL, 2018, 40 (13) : 3860 - 3871
  • [19] Abreu RP, 2017, J MOD APPL STAT METH, V16, P443, DOI 10.22237/jmasm/1509495840
  • [20] On control chart for monitoring exponentially distributed quality characteristic
    Adeoti, Olatunde A.
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE INSTITUTE OF MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL, 2020, 42 (02) : 295 - 305