Outstanding challenges and future directions for biodiversity monitoring using citizen science data

被引:101
作者
Johnston, Alison [1 ,2 ]
Matechou, Eleni [3 ]
Dennis, Emily B. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ St Andrews, Dept Maths & Stat, Ctr Res Ecol & Environm Modelling, St Andrews, Fife, Scotland
[2] Cornell Lab Ornithol, Ithaca, NY 14850 USA
[3] Univ Kent, Sch Math Stat & Actuarial Sci, Canterbury, Kent, England
[4] Butterfly Conservat, Wareham, Dorset, England
来源
METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION | 2023年 / 14卷 / 01期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
citizen science; community science; detectability; multi-species models; observation process; occupancy models; presence-only; statistical ecology; N-MIXTURE MODELS; SPECIES OCCURRENCE DATA; PRESENCE-ONLY DATA; BIG DATA; OCCUPANCY MODELS; ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH; SPATIAL BIAS; DATA QUALITY; ABUNDANCE; INFERENCE;
D O I
10.1111/2041-210X.13834
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
There is increasing availability and use of unstructured and semi-structured citizen science data in biodiversity research and conservation. This expansion of a rich source of 'big data' has sparked numerous research directions, driving the development of analytical approaches that account for the complex observation processes in these datasets. We review outstanding challenges in the analysis of citizen science data for biodiversity monitoring. For many of these challenges, the potential impact on ecological inference is unknown. Further research can document the impact and explore ways to address it. In addition to outlining research directions, describing these challenges may be useful in considering the design of future citizen science projects or additions to existing projects. We outline challenges for biodiversity monitoring using citizen science data in four partially overlapping categories: challenges that arise as a result of (a) observer behaviour; (b) data structures; (c) statistical models; and (d) communication. Potential solutions for these challenges are combinations of: (a) collecting additional data or metadata; (b) analytically combining different datasets; and (c) developing or refining statistical models. While there has been important progress to develop methods that tackle most of these challenges, there remain substantial gains in biodiversity monitoring and subsequent conservation actions that we believe will be possible by further research and development in these areas. The degree of challenge and opportunity that each of these presents varies substantially across different datasets, taxa and ecological questions. In some cases, a route forward to address these challenges is clear, while in other cases there is more scope for exploration and creativity.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 116
页数:14
相关论文
共 173 条
  • [51] Making Messy Data Work for Conservation
    Dobson, A. D. M.
    Milner-Gulland, E. J.
    Aebischer, Nicholas J.
    Beale, Colin M.
    Brozovic, Robert
    Coals, Peter
    Critchlow, Rob
    Dancer, Anthony
    Greve, Michelle
    Hinsley, Amy
    Ibbett, Harriet
    Johnston, Alison
    Kuiper, Timothy
    Le Comber, Steven
    Mahood, Simon P.
    Moore, Jennifer F.
    Nilsen, Erlend B.
    Pocock, Michael J. O.
    Quinn, Anthony
    Travers, Henry
    Wilfred, Paulo
    Wright, Joss
    Keane, Aidan
    [J]. ONE EARTH, 2020, 2 (05): : 455 - 465
  • [52] A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists
    Elith, Jane
    Phillips, Steven J.
    Hastie, Trevor
    Dudik, Miroslav
    Chee, Yung En
    Yates, Colin J.
    [J]. DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2011, 17 (01) : 43 - 57
  • [53] Paths to statistical fluency for ecologists
    Ellison, Aaron M.
    Dennis, Brian
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 8 (07) : 362 - 370
  • [54] Accounting for imperfect detection in data from museums and herbaria when modeling species distributions: combining and contrasting data-level versus model-level bias correction
    Erickson, Kelley D.
    Smith, Adam B.
    [J]. ECOGRAPHY, 2021, 44 (09) : 1341 - 1352
  • [55] OBSERVER EFFECTS AND AVIAN-CALL-COUNT SURVEY QUALITY: RARE-SPECIES BIASES AND OVERCONFIDENCE
    Farmer, Robert G.
    Leonard, Marty L.
    Horn, Andrew G.
    [J]. AUK, 2012, 129 (01): : 76 - 86
  • [56] Bias correction in species distribution models: pooling survey and collection data for multiple species
    Fithian, William
    Elith, Jane
    Hastie, Trevor
    Keith, David A.
    [J]. METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2015, 6 (04): : 424 - 438
  • [57] Observer bias and the detection of low-density populations
    Fitzpatrick, Matthew C.
    Preisser, Evan L.
    Ellison, Aaron M.
    Elkinton, Joseph S.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2009, 19 (07) : 1673 - 1679
  • [58] A practical guide for combining data to model species distributions
    Fletcher, Robert J., Jr.
    Hefley, Trevor J.
    Robertson, Ellen P.
    Zuckerberg, Benjamin
    McCleery, Robert A.
    Dorazio, Robert M.
    [J]. ECOLOGY, 2019, 100 (06)
  • [59] Lessons from lady beetles: accuracy of monitoring data from US and UK citizen-science programs
    Gardiner, Mary M.
    Allee, Leslie L.
    Brown, Peter M. J.
    Losey, John E.
    Roy, Helen E.
    Smyth, Rebecca Rice
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 10 (09) : 471 - 476
  • [60] What determines spatial bias in citizen science? Exploring four recording schemes with different proficiency requirements
    Geldmann, Jonas
    Heilmann-Clausen, Jacob
    Holm, Thomas E.
    Levinsky, Irina
    Markussen, Bo
    Olsen, Kent
    Rahbek, Carsten
    Tottrup, Anders P.
    [J]. DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2016, 22 (11) : 1139 - 1149