Outstanding challenges and future directions for biodiversity monitoring using citizen science data

被引:101
作者
Johnston, Alison [1 ,2 ]
Matechou, Eleni [3 ]
Dennis, Emily B. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ St Andrews, Dept Maths & Stat, Ctr Res Ecol & Environm Modelling, St Andrews, Fife, Scotland
[2] Cornell Lab Ornithol, Ithaca, NY 14850 USA
[3] Univ Kent, Sch Math Stat & Actuarial Sci, Canterbury, Kent, England
[4] Butterfly Conservat, Wareham, Dorset, England
来源
METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION | 2023年 / 14卷 / 01期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
citizen science; community science; detectability; multi-species models; observation process; occupancy models; presence-only; statistical ecology; N-MIXTURE MODELS; SPECIES OCCURRENCE DATA; PRESENCE-ONLY DATA; BIG DATA; OCCUPANCY MODELS; ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH; SPATIAL BIAS; DATA QUALITY; ABUNDANCE; INFERENCE;
D O I
10.1111/2041-210X.13834
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
There is increasing availability and use of unstructured and semi-structured citizen science data in biodiversity research and conservation. This expansion of a rich source of 'big data' has sparked numerous research directions, driving the development of analytical approaches that account for the complex observation processes in these datasets. We review outstanding challenges in the analysis of citizen science data for biodiversity monitoring. For many of these challenges, the potential impact on ecological inference is unknown. Further research can document the impact and explore ways to address it. In addition to outlining research directions, describing these challenges may be useful in considering the design of future citizen science projects or additions to existing projects. We outline challenges for biodiversity monitoring using citizen science data in four partially overlapping categories: challenges that arise as a result of (a) observer behaviour; (b) data structures; (c) statistical models; and (d) communication. Potential solutions for these challenges are combinations of: (a) collecting additional data or metadata; (b) analytically combining different datasets; and (c) developing or refining statistical models. While there has been important progress to develop methods that tackle most of these challenges, there remain substantial gains in biodiversity monitoring and subsequent conservation actions that we believe will be possible by further research and development in these areas. The degree of challenge and opportunity that each of these presents varies substantially across different datasets, taxa and ecological questions. In some cases, a route forward to address these challenges is clear, while in other cases there is more scope for exploration and creativity.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 116
页数:14
相关论文
共 173 条
  • [31] Efficient Bayesian analysis of occupancy models with logit link functions
    Clark, Allan E.
    Altwegg, Res
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2019, 9 (02): : 756 - 768
  • [32] Big data, big risks
    Clarke, Roger
    [J]. INFORMATION SYSTEMS JOURNAL, 2016, 26 (01) : 77 - 90
  • [33] Confronting preferential sampling when analysing population distributions: diagnosis and model-based triage
    Conn, Paul B.
    Thorson, James T.
    Johnson, Devin S.
    [J]. METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2017, 8 (11): : 1535 - 1546
  • [34] Estimating multispecies abundance using automated detection systems: ice-associated seals in the Bering Sea
    Conn, Paul B.
    Hoef, Jay M. Ver
    McClintock, Brett T.
    Moreland, Erin E.
    London, Josh M.
    Cameron, Michael F.
    Dahle, Shawn P.
    Boveng, Peter L.
    [J]. METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2014, 5 (12): : 1280 - 1293
  • [35] Accommodating species identification errors in transect surveys
    Conn, Paul B.
    McClintock, Brett T.
    Cameron, Michael F.
    Johnson, Devin S.
    Moreland, Erin E.
    Boveng, Peter L.
    [J]. ECOLOGY, 2013, 94 (11) : 2607 - 2618
  • [36] Cooch E., 2017, PROGRAM MARK GENTLE, P17
  • [37] Teaching and learning in ecology: a horizon scan of emerging challenges and solutions
    Cooke, Julia
    Araya, Yoseph
    Bacon, Karen L.
    Bagniewska, Joanna M.
    Batty, Lesley C.
    Bishop, Tom R.
    Burns, Moya
    Charalambous, Magda
    Daversa, David R.
    Dougherty, Liam R.
    Dyson, Miranda
    Fisher, Adam M.
    Forman, Dan
    Garcia, Cristina
    Harney, Ewan
    Hesselberg, Thomas
    John, Elizabeth A.
    Knell, Robert J.
    Maseyk, Kadmiel
    Mauchline, Alice L.
    Peacock, Julie
    Pernetta, Angelo P.
    Pritchard, Jeremy
    Sutherland, William J.
    Thomas, Rebecca L.
    Tigar, Barbara
    Wheeler, Philip
    White, Rachel L.
    Worsfold, Nicholas T.
    Lewis, Zenobia
    [J]. OIKOS, 2021, 130 (01) : 15 - 28
  • [38] Assessing citizen science data quality: an invasive species case study
    Crall, Alycia W.
    Newman, Gregory J.
    Stohlgren, Thomas J.
    Holfelder, Kirstin A.
    Graham, Jim
    Waller, Donald M.
    [J]. CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2011, 4 (06): : 433 - 442
  • [39] Quantifying data quality in a citizen science monitoring program: False negatives, false positives and occupancy trends
    Cruickshank, Sam S.
    Buehler, Christoph
    Schmidt, Benedikt R.
    [J]. CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2019, 1 (07)
  • [40] Can citizen science monitor whale-shark aggregations? Investigating bias in mark-recapture modelling using identification photographs sourced from the public
    Davies, Tim K.
    Stevens, Guy
    Meekan, Mark G.
    Struve, Juliane
    Rowcliffe, J. Marcus
    [J]. WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 2012, 39 (08) : 696 - 704