A Review of Industry 4.0 Assessment Instruments for Digital Transformation

被引:10
作者
Iribarren, Miranda Zamora [1 ]
Garay-Rondero, Claudia Lizette [1 ,2 ]
Lemus-Aguilar, Isaac [3 ,4 ]
Peimbert-Garcia, Rodrigo E. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Sch Engn & Sci, Tecnol Monterrey, Ave Eugenio Garza Sada 2501 Sur, Monterrey 64700, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
[2] Inst Future Educ, Tecnol Monterrey, Ave Eugenio Garza Sada 2501 Sur, Monterrey 64700, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
[3] EGADE Business Sch, EGADE Business Sch, Eugenio Garza Laguera & Rufino Tamayo, San Pedro Garza Garcia 66269, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
[4] Univ Politecn Madrid, Ind Escuela Negocios, C Jose Gutierrez Abascal 2, Madrid 28006, Spain
[5] Univ Technol Sydney, Fac Engn & IT, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2024年 / 14卷 / 05期
关键词
Industry; 4.0; digital transformation; assessment instruments; readiness assessment; maturity models; smart factory; framework; roadmap; Systematic Literature Review; MATURITY MODEL; READINESS; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.3390/app14051693
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Featured Application A robust Systematic Literature Review (SLR) of assessment instruments (maturity models, roadmaps, frameworks, and readiness assessments) to assess the level at which Industry 4.0 is deployed in an organization. The research provides a comprehensive perspective of readiness assessment instruments for Industry 4.0 digital transformation and sets the foundations for future action plans and projects.Abstract Nowadays, different Industry 4.0 technologies have been implemented into diverse industries. However, these implementations are not standardized across similar industries and countries. Consequently, companies are actively looking for assessment instruments-maturity models, roadmaps, frameworks, readiness assessments-to assist in their digital transformation, to determine their Industry 4.0 level, and to identify technologies and strategies that should be implemented in specific areas, thus developing a feasible implementation plan. A review is conducted following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Literature Reviews and Meta-Analyses) methodology to analyze the different research works on assessment instruments focused on Industry 4.0. A total of 538 articles, book chapters, conference proceedings, editorial material, reviews, and reports written in the English language were retrieved. Of these, 132 research papers were examined using a mixed analysis format to generate bibliometrics, and 36 articles were then deeply studied for a complete meta-analysis. The findings and insights of this meta-analysis led to a compilation and summary of dimensions, outcomes, enablers, and key components typically involved in Industry 4.0, which are comprehensively integrated to present the best practices for assessing Industry 4.0 and deploying a digital transformation that can impact productivity, flexibility, sustainability, quality, costs, and time.
引用
收藏
页数:38
相关论文
共 59 条
[21]   Industry 4.0, digitization, and opportunities for sustainability [J].
Ghobakhloo, Morteza .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 252
[22]   Digital transformation capability maturity model enabling the assessment of industrial manufacturers [J].
Gokalp, Ebru ;
Martinez, Veronica .
COMPUTERS IN INDUSTRY, 2021, 132
[23]   Development of an Assessment Model for Industry 4.0: Industry 4.0-MM [J].
Gokalp, Ebru ;
Sener, Umut ;
Eren, P. Erhan .
SOFTWARE PROCESS IMPROVEMENT AND CAPABILITY DETERMINATION, SPICE 2017, 2017, 770 :128-142
[24]   Development of a Digital Transformation Maturity Model for IT Companies [J].
Gollhardt, Torsten ;
Halsbenning, Sebastian ;
Hermann, Andreas ;
Karsakova, Aleksandra ;
Becker, Joerg .
2020 IEEE 22ND CONFERENCE ON BUSINESS INFORMATICS (CBI 2020), VOL I - RESEARCH PAPERS, 2020, :94-103
[25]   A framework to measure readiness and barriers for the implementation of Industry 4.0: A case approach [J].
Govindan, Kannan ;
Arampatzis, Georgios .
ELECTRONIC COMMERCE RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2023, 59
[26]   Relationship marketing readiness: theoretical background and measurement directions [J].
Gronroos, Christian .
JOURNAL OF SERVICES MARKETING, 2017, 31 (03) :218-225
[27]   A fuzzy rule-based industry 4.0 maturity model for operations and supply chain management [J].
Gusmao Caiado, Rodrigo Goyannes ;
Scavarda, Luiz Felipe ;
Gaviao, Luiz Octavio ;
Ivson, Paulo ;
de Mattos Nascimento, Daniel Luiz ;
Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2021, 231
[28]   Study on the Digital Transformation Capability of Cost Consultation Enterprises Based on Maturity Model [J].
Han, Xiao ;
Zhang, Menghan ;
Hu, Yixuan ;
Huang, Yuan .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (16)
[29]   Maturity assessment for Industry 5.0: A review of existing maturity models [J].
Hein-Pensel, Franziska ;
Winkler, Heiner ;
Brueckner, Anja ;
Woelke, Mandy ;
Jabs, Iren ;
Mayan, Ines Jasmin ;
Kirschenbaum, Amit ;
Friedrich, Julia ;
Zinke-Wehlmann, Christian .
JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS, 2023, 66 :200-210
[30]  
Holt DT, 2009, IND INNOV SER