Recent advances and current challenges of new approach methodologies in developmental and adult neurotoxicity testing

被引:4
作者
Serafini, Melania Maria [1 ]
Sepehri, Sara [2 ]
Midali, Miriam [1 ]
Stinckens, Marth [2 ]
Biesiekierska, Marta [3 ]
Wolniakowska, Anna [3 ]
Gatzios, Alexandra [2 ]
Runden-Pran, Elise [4 ]
Reszka, Edyta [3 ]
Marinovich, Marina [1 ,5 ]
Vanhaecke, Tamara [2 ]
Roszak, Joanna [3 ]
Viviani, Barbara [1 ,5 ]
SenGupta, Tanima [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Dept Pharmacol & Biomol Sci Rodolfo Paoletti, Milan, Italy
[2] Vrije Univ Brussel, Dept In Vitro Toxicol & Dermato Cosmetol IVTD, Brussels, Belgium
[3] Nofer Inst Occupat Med, Dept Translat Res, Lodz, Poland
[4] Climate & Environm Res Inst NILU, Kjeller, Norway
[5] Univ Milan, Ctr Res New Approach Methodol NAMs Chem Risk Asses, Milan, Italy
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
New approach methodologies; Developmental neurotoxicity; Adult neurotoxicity; Adverse outcome pathways; PLURIPOTENT STEM-CELLS; IN-SILICO PREDICTION; GABAERGIC NEURONS; RISK-ASSESSMENT; MOUSE MODEL; MICROGLIA; TOXICOLOGY; BARRIER; GENERATION; ZEBRAFISH;
D O I
10.1007/s00204-024-03703-8
中图分类号
R99 [毒物学(毒理学)];
学科分类号
100405 ;
摘要
Adult neurotoxicity (ANT) and developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) assessments aim to understand the adverse effects and underlying mechanisms of toxicants on the human nervous system. In recent years, there has been an increasing focus on the so-called new approach methodologies (NAMs). The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), together with European and American regulatory agencies, promote the use of validated alternative test systems, but to date, guidelines for regulatory DNT and ANT assessment rely primarily on classical animal testing. Alternative methods include both non-animal approaches and test systems on non-vertebrates (e.g., nematodes) or non-mammals (e.g., fish). Therefore, this review summarizes the recent advances of NAMs focusing on ANT and DNT and highlights the potential and current critical issues for the full implementation of these methods in the future. The status of the DNT in vitro battery (DNT IVB) is also reviewed as a first step of NAMs for the assessment of neurotoxicity in the regulatory context. Critical issues such as (i) the need for test batteries and method integration (from in silico and in vitro to in vivo alternatives, e.g., zebrafish, C. elegans) requiring interdisciplinarity to manage complexity, (ii) interlaboratory transferability, and (iii) the urgent need for method validation are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:1271 / 1295
页数:25
相关论文
共 195 条
  • [1] INVITRO TESTS OF NEUROTOXICITY
    ABDULLA, EM
    CAMPBELL, IC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGICAL AND TOXICOLOGICAL METHODS, 1993, 29 (02) : 69 - 75
  • [2] iPSC-Derived Human Microglia-like Cells to Study Neurological Diseases
    Abud, Edsel M.
    Ramirez, Ricardo N.
    Martinez, Eric S.
    Healy, Luke M.
    Nguyen, Cecilia H. H.
    Newman, Sean A.
    Yeromin, Andriy V.
    Scarfone, Vanessa M.
    Marsh, Samuel E.
    Fimbres, Cristhian
    Caraway, Chad A.
    Fote, Gianna M.
    Madany, Abdullah M.
    Agrawal, Anshu
    Kayed, Rakez
    Gylys, Karen H.
    Cahalan, Michael D.
    Cummings, Brian J.
    Antel, Jack P.
    Mortazavi, Ali
    Carson, Monica J.
    Poon, Wayne W.
    Blurton-Jones, Mathew
    [J]. NEURON, 2017, 94 (02) : 278 - +
  • [3] Alimohammadi M, 2023, EFSA support Publ. EN-7794, DOI [10.2903/sp.efsa.2023.EN-7794, DOI 10.2903/SP.EFSA.2023.EN-7794]
  • [4] American Psychiatric Association, 1994, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, DOI DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2006, OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, V1, P1, DOI DOI 10.1787/9789264067394-EN
  • [6] Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Food Additives, Flavourings, Processing Aids and Materials in contact with Food (AFC) on a request from the Commission related to Flavouring Group Evaluation 11 (FGE. 11): Aliphatic dialcohols, diketones, and hydroxyketones from chemical group 10 (Commission Regulation (EC) No 1565/2000 of 18 July 2000) (Adopted on 9 December 2004)
    Anton, Robert
    Barlow, Sue
    Boskou, Dimitrios
    Castle, Laurence
    Crebelli, Riccardo
    Dekant, Wolfgang
    Engel, Karl-Heinz
    Forsythe, Stephen
    Grunow, Werner
    Larsen, John Chr.
    Leclercq, Catherine
    Mennes, Wim
    Milana, Maria Rosaria
    Pratt, Iona
    Rietjens, Ivonne
    Svensson, Kettil
    Tobback, Paul
    Toldra, Fidel
    [J]. EFSA JOURNAL, 2005, 3 (02):
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2013, EFSA Journal, V11, P3293, DOI DOI 10.2903/J.EFSA.2013.3293
  • [8] [Anonymous], 1991, Federal Register, V56, P63798
  • [9] Pre-clinical animal models are poor predictors of human toxicities in phase 1 oncology clinical trials
    Atkins, Johnique T.
    George, Goldy C.
    Hess, Kenneth
    Marcelo-Lewis, Kathrina L.
    Yuan, Ying
    Borthakur, Gautam
    Khozin, Sean
    LoRusso, Patricia
    Hong, David S.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2020, 123 (10) : 1496 - 1501
  • [10] Recommendation on Test Readiness Criteria for New Approach Methods in Toxicology: Exemplified for Developmental Neurotoxicity
    Bal-Price, Anna
    Hogberg, Helena T.
    Crofton, Kevin M.
    Daneshian, Mardas
    FitzGerald, Rex E.
    Fritsche, Ellen
    Heinonen, Tuula
    Bennekou, Susanne Hougaard
    Klima, Stefanie
    Piersma, Aldert H.
    Sachana, Magdalini
    Shafer, Timothy J.
    Terron, Andrea
    Monnet-Tschudi, Florianne
    Viviani, Barbara
    Waldmann, Tanja
    Westerink, Remco H. S.
    Wilks, Martin F.
    Witters, Hilda
    Zurich, Marie-Gabrielle
    Leist, Marcel
    [J]. ALTEX-ALTERNATIVES TO ANIMAL EXPERIMENTATION, 2018, 35 (03) : 306 - 352