Safety and feasibility study of a novel robotic system in an in vivo porcine vascular model

被引:1
作者
Moschovaki-Zeiger, Ornella [1 ]
Arkoudis, Nikolaos-Achilleas [1 ]
Spiliopoulos, Stavros [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl & Kapodistrian Univ Athens, Attikon Univ Gen Hosp, Med Sch, Dept Radiol 2,Intervent Radiol Unit, 1st Rimini St, GR-12461 Athens, Greece
关键词
Robotics; Endovascular intervention; Visceral catheterization; Remote intervention; Robotic-assisted intervention; TECHNOLOGY; TUMORS; BRAIN;
D O I
10.1186/s42155-024-00425-x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
PurposeThe goal of this preclinical study is to assess the functionality, technical feasibility, and safety of a new vascular robotic LIBERTYR 3 System, in the microcatheterization of vascular targets using a range of guidewires and microcatheters.Material and methodsAn anesthetized pig served as an arterial model for the robotic device (LIBERTYR3; Microbot Medical Ltd, Yoqneam, IL). The primary efficacy endpoint was the evaluation of its capability to selectively catheterize predetermined distal arterial branches in the liver, kidneys, and mesenteric arteries (technical success), under fluoroscopy guidance. The primary safety endpoint was the occurrence of angiographic acute catheterization-related complications (dissection, thrombosis, embolism, perforation). The catheterizations were conducted by two interventional radiologists that present different work experience in endovascular procedures (18 and 2 years respectively), using a variety of microcatheters and wires. Various procedural parameters such as functionality, practicality, ease of use, and time required for selective catheterization, were evaluated, and recorded.ResultsAll pre-determined arteries were successfully selectively catheterized (100% technical success), by both operators. No angiographic acute complications occurred. The microcatheters and wires were manipulated using the remote portable console in an effortless manner that maintained a high level of accuracy. Mean time for selective catheterization was 131 +/- 82 s. The robot's conversion function to manual operation was successfully demonstrated.ConclusionRobotic navigation and catheterization of selected target arteries were accomplished without observable vascular damage, suggesting that the LIBERTYR 3 robotic system is a reliable and safe tool for robotic-assisted endovascular navigation. Further experimental studies are required to evaluate safety and efficacy prior to introduction into clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Occupational Health Risks in Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Workers
    Andreassi, Maria Grazia
    Piccaluga, Emanuela
    Guagliumi, Giulio
    Del Greco, Maurizio
    Gaita, Fiorenzo
    Picano, Eugenio
    [J]. CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2016, 9 (04)
  • [2] Remote-control percutaneous coronary interventions - Concept, validation, and first-in-humans pilot clinical trial
    Beyar, R
    Gruberg, L
    Deleanu, D
    Roguin, A
    Almagor, Y
    Cohen, S
    Kumar, G
    Wenderow, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2006, 47 (02) : 296 - 300
  • [3] Feasibility and Safety of Remote Endovascular Catheter Navigation in a Porcine Model
    Bismuth, Jean
    Kashef, Elika
    Cheshire, Nicholas
    Lumsden, Alan B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2011, 18 (02) : 243 - 249
  • [4] Technical and Clinical Progress on Robot-Assisted Endovascular Interventions: A Review
    Duan, Wenke
    Akinyemi, Toluwanimi
    Du, Wenjing
    Ma, Jun
    Chen, Xingyu
    Wang, Fuhao
    Omisore, Olatunji
    Luo, Jingjing
    Wang, Hongbo
    Wang, Lei
    [J]. MICROMACHINES, 2023, 14 (01)
  • [5] Klein LW, 2021, J INVASIVE CARDIOL, V33, pE342
  • [6] A short history of robotic surgery A concise review of the use of robotic technology to enhance surgery
    Lane, Tim
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2018, 100 (06) : 5 - 7
  • [7] Preclinical study testing feasibility and technical requirements for successful telerobotic long distance peripheral vascular intervention
    Legeza, Peter
    Sconzert, Kalyna
    Sungur, John-Michael
    Loh, Thomas M.
    Britz, Gavin
    Lumsden, Alan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2021, 17 (03)
  • [8] Robotic technology in interventional cardiology: Current status and future perspectives
    Mahmud, Ehtisham
    Pourdjabbar, Ali
    Ang, Lawrence
    Behnamfar, Omid
    Patel, Mitul P.
    Reeves, Ryan R.
    [J]. CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2017, 90 (06) : 956 - 962
  • [9] Current State of Robotics in Interventional Radiology
    Najafi, Ghazal
    Kreiser, Kornelia
    Abdelaziz, Mohamed E. M. K.
    Hamady, Mohamad S.
    [J]. CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2023, 46 (05) : 549 - 561
  • [10] Evaluation of effectiveness and safety of the CorPath GRX robotic system in endovascular embolization procedures of cerebral aneurysms
    Pereira, Vitor Mendes
    Rice, Hal
    De Villiers, Laetitia
    Sourour, Nader
    Clarencon, Frederic
    Spears, Julian
    Tomasello, Alejandro
    Hernandez, David
    Cancelliere, Nicole M.
    Liu, Xiao Yu Eileen
    Nicholson, Patrick
    Costalat, Vincent
    Gascou, Gregory
    Mordasini, Pasquale
    Gralla, Jan
    Martinez-Galdamez, Mario
    Galvan Fernandez, Jorge
    Killer-Oberpfalzer, Monika
    Turner, Raymond D.
    Blanc, Raphael
    Piotin, Michel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROINTERVENTIONAL SURGERY, 2024, 16 (04) : 405 - 411