Research ethics and collaborative research in health and social care: Analysis of UK research ethics policies, scoping review of the literature, and focus group study

被引:2
作者
De Poli, Chiara [1 ,2 ]
Oyebode, Jan [3 ]
机构
[1] London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, Care Policy & Evaluat Ctr, Dept Hlth Policy, London, England
[2] London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, Care Policy & Evaluat Ctr, Dept Social Policy, London, England
[3] Univ Bradford, Fac Hlth Studies, Ctr Appl Dementia Studies, Bradford, England
来源
PLOS ONE | 2023年 / 18卷 / 12期
关键词
PARTICIPATORY ACTION RESEARCH; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH ETHICS; COMMUNITY-ENGAGED RESEARCH; YOUNG-PEOPLE; CHALLENGES; COMMITTEES; VULNERABILITY; OVERSIGHT; KNOWLEDGE; CONSENT;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0296223
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Current research ethics frameworks were developed on the footprint of biomedical, experimental research and present several pitfalls when applied to non-experimental social sciences. This work explores how the normative principles underpinning policy and regulatory frameworks of research ethics and the related operational processes work in practice in the context of collaborative health and social care research. The work was organised in three phases. First, UK research ethics policy documents were analysed thematically, with themes further organised under the categories of 'Principles' and 'Processes'. Next, we conducted a scoping review of articles about research ethics in the context of collaborative health and social care research, published in English between 2010 and 2022. We then held an exploratory focus group with ten academic researchers with relevant experience to gather their views on how the research ethics system works in practice in England (UK). The thematic framework developed in the first phase supported the analysis of the articles included in the scoping review and of focus group data. The analysis of policy documents identified twelve themes. All were associated to both a principle and a related operational process. The scoping review identified 31 articles. Across these, some themes were barely acknowledged (e.g., Compliance with legislation). Other themes were extensively covered (e.g., The working of Research Ethics Committees), often to discuss issues and limitations in how, in practice, the research ethics system and its processes deal with collaborative research and to suggest options for improvement. Focus group data were largely consistent with the findings of the scoping review. This work provides evidence of the poor alignment between how the research ethics system is normatively expected to work and how it works in practice and offers options that could make research ethics more fit for purpose when addressing collaborative research in health and social care.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   The understanding of research ethics at health sciences schools in Jordan: a cross-sectional study [J].
Abu Tarboush, Nafez ;
Alkayed, Zaid ;
Alzoubi, Karem H. ;
Al-Delaimy, Wael K. .
BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2020, 20 (01)
[42]   Ethics review of multisite studies: the difficult case of community-based Indigenous health research [J].
Studdert, David M. ;
Vu, Tamara M. ;
Fox, Sarah S. ;
Anderson, Ian P. ;
Keeffe, Jill E. ;
Taylor, Hugh R. .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2010, 192 (05) :275-280
[43]   Reporting of Research Ethics in Studies Focusing on Foot Health in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis - A Systematic Review [J].
Stolt, Minna ;
Kielo-Viljamaa, Emilia ;
Laitinen, Anne-Marie ;
Suhonen, Riitta ;
Leino-Kilpi, Helena .
JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2022, 17 (1-2) :39-51
[44]   Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice Regarding Research Ethics Committees Among Health Care Faculty at Two Public Universities in Jordan [J].
Ayoub, Nehad M. ;
Qandil, Abeer M. ;
McCutchan, J. Allen .
JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2019, 14 (04) :372-382
[45]   The ethics of researching intimate partner violence in global health: A case study from global health research [J].
Mannell, Jenevieve ;
Guta, Adrian .
GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 13 (08) :1035-1049
[46]   Adolescent Capacity to Consent to Participate in Research: A Review and Analysis Informed by Law, Human Rights, Ethics, and Developmental Science [J].
Ben Mathews .
LAWS, 2023, 12 (01)
[47]   Hospitals as innovators in the health-care system: A literature review and research agenda [J].
Thune, Taran ;
Mina, Andrea .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2016, 45 (08) :57-69
[48]   Relational, ethically sound co-production in mental health care research: epistemic injustice and the need for an ethics of care [J].
Groot, Barbara ;
Haveman, Annyk ;
Abma, Tineke .
CRITICAL PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 32 (02) :230-240
[49]   Barriers and facilitators to establishing a clinical academic career in clinical education research in the UK: A focus group study [J].
Bluemel, Anna Harvey ;
Burton, Oliver E. ;
Burford, Bryan ;
Ellis, Janice ;
Finn, Gabrielle ;
Bala, Laksha ;
Byrne, Matthew H. V. ;
Vance, Gillian ;
Alao, Adedoyin .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2024, 46 (10) :1369-1377
[50]   Reasoning "Uncharted Territory": Notions of Expertise Within Ethics Review Panels Assessing Research Use of Social Media [J].
Sellers, Chelsea ;
Samuel, Gabrielle ;
Derrick, Gemma .
JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2020, 15 (1-2) :28-39