Research ethics and collaborative research in health and social care: Analysis of UK research ethics policies, scoping review of the literature, and focus group study

被引:2
作者
De Poli, Chiara [1 ,2 ]
Oyebode, Jan [3 ]
机构
[1] London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, Care Policy & Evaluat Ctr, Dept Hlth Policy, London, England
[2] London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, Care Policy & Evaluat Ctr, Dept Social Policy, London, England
[3] Univ Bradford, Fac Hlth Studies, Ctr Appl Dementia Studies, Bradford, England
来源
PLOS ONE | 2023年 / 18卷 / 12期
关键词
PARTICIPATORY ACTION RESEARCH; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH ETHICS; COMMUNITY-ENGAGED RESEARCH; YOUNG-PEOPLE; CHALLENGES; COMMITTEES; VULNERABILITY; OVERSIGHT; KNOWLEDGE; CONSENT;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0296223
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Current research ethics frameworks were developed on the footprint of biomedical, experimental research and present several pitfalls when applied to non-experimental social sciences. This work explores how the normative principles underpinning policy and regulatory frameworks of research ethics and the related operational processes work in practice in the context of collaborative health and social care research. The work was organised in three phases. First, UK research ethics policy documents were analysed thematically, with themes further organised under the categories of 'Principles' and 'Processes'. Next, we conducted a scoping review of articles about research ethics in the context of collaborative health and social care research, published in English between 2010 and 2022. We then held an exploratory focus group with ten academic researchers with relevant experience to gather their views on how the research ethics system works in practice in England (UK). The thematic framework developed in the first phase supported the analysis of the articles included in the scoping review and of focus group data. The analysis of policy documents identified twelve themes. All were associated to both a principle and a related operational process. The scoping review identified 31 articles. Across these, some themes were barely acknowledged (e.g., Compliance with legislation). Other themes were extensively covered (e.g., The working of Research Ethics Committees), often to discuss issues and limitations in how, in practice, the research ethics system and its processes deal with collaborative research and to suggest options for improvement. Focus group data were largely consistent with the findings of the scoping review. This work provides evidence of the poor alignment between how the research ethics system is normatively expected to work and how it works in practice and offers options that could make research ethics more fit for purpose when addressing collaborative research in health and social care.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The significance of ethics reflection groups in mental health care: a focus group study among health care professionals
    Hem, Marit Helene
    Molewijk, Bert
    Gjerberg, Elisabeth
    Lillemoen, Lillian
    Pedersen, Reidar
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2018, 19
  • [32] The ethics of community-based research with people who use drugs: results of a scoping review
    Souleymanov, Rusty
    Kuzmanovic, Dario
    Marshall, Zack
    Scheim, Ayden I.
    Mikiki, Mikiki
    Worthington, Catherine
    Millson, Margaret
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2016, 17
  • [33] The ethics of community-based research with people who use drugs: results of a scoping review
    Rusty Souleymanov
    Dario Kuzmanović
    Zack Marshall
    Ayden I. Scheim
    Mikiki Mikiki
    Catherine Worthington
    Margaret (Peggy) Millson
    [J]. BMC Medical Ethics, 17
  • [34] Research ethics in practice: An analysis of ethical issues encountered in qualitative health research with mental health service users and relatives
    Potthoff, Sarah
    Hempeler, Christin
    Gather, Jakov
    Gieselmann, Astrid
    Vollmann, Jochen
    Scholten, Matthe
    [J]. MEDICINE HEALTH CARE AND PHILOSOPHY, 2023, 26 (04) : 517 - 527
  • [35] Research ethics in practice: An analysis of ethical issues encountered in qualitative health research with mental health service users and relatives
    Sarah Potthoff
    Christin Hempeler
    Jakov Gather
    Astrid Gieselmann
    Jochen Vollmann
    Matthé Scholten
    [J]. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 2023, 26 : 517 - 527
  • [36] Black and minority ethnic group involvement in health and social care research: A systematic review
    Dawson, Shoba
    Campbell, Stephen M.
    Giles, Sally J.
    Morris, Rebecca L.
    Cheraghi-Sohi, Sudeh
    [J]. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2018, 21 (01) : 3 - 22
  • [37] What Does Information Science Offer for Data Science Research?: A Review of Data and Information Ethics Literature
    Lund, Brady
    Wang, Ting
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DATA AND INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2022, 7 (04) : 16 - 38
  • [38] Mapping the Ethics of Learning Analytics in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review of Empirical Research
    Pargman, Teresa Cerratto
    McGrath, Cormac
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LEARNING ANALYTICS, 2021, 8 (02): : 123 - 139
  • [39] A scoping review of academic and grey literature on migrant health research conducted in Scotland
    Petrie, G.
    Angus, K.
    O'Donnell, R.
    [J]. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [40] Ethics of care in participatory health research: mutual responsibility in collaboration with co-researchers
    Groot, B. C.
    Vink, M.
    Haveman, A.
    Huberts, M.
    Schout, G.
    Abma, T. A.
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL ACTION RESEARCH, 2019, 27 (02) : 286 - 302