The effect of a pre-scheduled appointment on attendance in a population-based mammography screening programme

被引:4
作者
Goossens, Mathijs M. [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Kellen, Eliane [2 ,3 ]
Broeders, Mireille J. M. [4 ,5 ]
Vandemaele, Els [2 ]
Jacobs, Brenda [1 ,2 ]
Martens, Patrick [2 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Brussel, Dept Radiol, Brussels, Belgium
[2] Ctr Canc Detect, Ctr Kankeropsporing, Brugge, Belgium
[3] Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Radiol, Campus St Rafael, Leuven, Belgium
[4] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Hlth Evidence, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[5] Dutch Expert Ctr Screening, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[6] Vrije Univ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium
关键词
BREAST; CANCER; NONATTENDERS;
D O I
10.1093/eurpub/ckad137
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Pre-scheduled appointments can increase attendance in breast cancer screening programmes compared to 'open invitations' but relatively few randomized controlled trials exist. We investigated the effect of a pre-scheduled appointment on uptake in the Flemish population-based mammography screening programme. Methods Between September and December 2022, a total of 4798 women were randomly assigned to receive either a pre-scheduled appointment or open invitation. The difference in attendance was compared with Poisson regression analysis for the primary endpoint (attendance & LE;92 days after date of invitation), yielding relative risks (RRs). This was done separately for three groups: women invited to a mobile unit and a history of nonattendance (group M-NA); women invited to a hospital-based unit and a history of nonattendance (group HB-NA); women invited to a hospital-based unit and a history of irregular attendance (group HB-IA). There were no women invited to a mobile unit and a history of irregular attendance. Results The RRs in favour of the pre-scheduled appointment were 2.3 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.80-2.88], 1.8 (95% CI 1.07-2.97) and 1.8 (95% CI 1.43-2.39), for groups M-NA, HB-NA and HB-IA, respectively. We found no statistically significant difference between the various RRs. The respective absolute gains in attendance between pre-scheduled appointment and open invitation were 8.3%, 4.4% and 15.8%. Conclusions Sending an invitation with a pre-scheduled appointment is an effective tool to increase screening attendance in both mobile and hospital-based screening units. The pre-scheduled appointment is associated with a considerable absolute gain in attendance which varies depending on the screening history.
引用
收藏
页码:1122 / 1127
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Effect of second timed appointments for non-attenders of breast cancer screening in England: a randomised controlled trial [J].
Allgood, Prue C. ;
Maroni, Roberta ;
Hudson, Sue ;
Offman, Judith ;
Turnbull, Anne E. ;
Peacock, Lesley ;
Steel, Jim ;
Kirby, Geraldine ;
Ingram, Christine E. ;
Somers, Julie ;
Fuller, Clare ;
Threlfall, Anthony G. ;
Gabe, Rhian ;
Maxwell, Anthony J. ;
Patnick, Julietta ;
Duffy, Stephen W. .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2017, 18 (07) :972-980
[2]   Statistics Notes - Interaction revisited: the difference between two estimates [J].
Altman, DG ;
Bland, JM .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 326 (7382) :219-219
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2023, INVITING WOMEN SUBSE
[4]   Determinants of (non-)attendance at the Dutch cancer screening programmes: A systematic review [J].
Bongaerts, Thomas H. G. ;
Buchner, Frederike L. ;
Middelkoop, Barend J. C. ;
Guicherit, Onno R. ;
Numans, Mattijs E. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2020, 27 (03) :121-129
[5]   Methods to increase participation in organised screening programs: a systematic review [J].
Camilloni, Laura ;
Ferroni, Eliana ;
Cendales, Beatriz Jimenez ;
Pezzarossi, Annamaria ;
Furnari, Giacomo ;
Borgia, Piero ;
Guasticchi, Gabriella ;
Rossi, Paolo Giorgi .
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 13
[6]  
Centrum voor Kankeropsporing, 2022, JAARVERSLAG 2022
[7]   The effect of the Flemish breast cancer screening program on breast cancer-specific mortality: A case-referent study [J].
De Troeyer, Katrien ;
Silversmit, Geert ;
Rosskamp, Michael ;
Truyen, Inge ;
Van Herck, Koen ;
Goossens, Mathijs Michiel ;
Martens, Patrick ;
Kellen, Eliane ;
Hendrickx, Erik ;
Rummens, Elise ;
De Smet, Frank ;
Broeders, Mireille ;
Verdoodt, Freija ;
De Schutter, Harlinde .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2023, 82
[8]   Determinants of Non-Participation in Population-Based Breast Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Ding, Lilu ;
Wang, J. ;
Greuter, M. J. W. ;
Goossens, M. ;
Van Hal, Guido ;
de Bock, Geertruida H. .
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
[9]   Rapid review of evaluation of interventions to improve participation in cancer screening services [J].
Duffy, Stephen W. ;
Myles, Jonathan P. ;
Maroni, Roberta ;
Mohammad, Abeera .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2017, 24 (03) :127-145
[10]   The impact of different communication and organizational strategies on mammography screening uptake in women aged 40-45 years [J].
Giordano, Livia ;
Stefanini, Valeria ;
Senore, Carlo ;
Frigerio, Alfonso ;
Castagno, Roberta ;
Marra, Vincenzo ;
Dalmasso, Marco ;
del Turco, Marco Rosselli ;
Paci, Eugenio ;
Segnan, Nereo .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2012, 22 (03) :413-418