Treatment of FIGO 2018 stage IIIC cervical cancer with different local tumor factors

被引:4
作者
Ye, Yanna [1 ,2 ]
Li, Zhiqiang [1 ]
Kang, Shan [3 ]
Yang, Yongxiu [4 ]
Ling, Bin [5 ]
Wang, Li [6 ]
Yao, Jilong [7 ]
Li, Pengfei [1 ]
Wang, Xueqin [8 ]
Gong, Shipeng [1 ]
Fan, Huijian [9 ]
Kong, Yanxiang [10 ]
Cao, Yuye [1 ]
Lang, Jinghe [1 ,11 ]
Liu, Ping [1 ]
Chen, Chunlin [1 ]
机构
[1] Southern Med Univ, Nanfang Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 1838 Guangzhou Ave, Guangzhou 510515, Peoples R China
[2] Dongguan Polytech, Fac Hlth, Dept Midwifery, Dongguan 523000, Peoples R China
[3] Hebei Med Univ, Hosp 4, Dept Gynecol, Shijiazhuang 050019, Peoples R China
[4] Lanzhou Univ, Hosp 1, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China
[5] China Japan Friendship Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
[6] Zhengzhou Univ, Affiliated Canc Hosp, Dept Gynecol Oncol, Zhengzhou 450008, Peoples R China
[7] Shenzhen Maternal & Child Hlth Hosp, Shenzhen 518028, Peoples R China
[8] Southern Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 5, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Guangzhou 510920, Peoples R China
[9] Guangzhou Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 3, Guangzhou 510150, Peoples R China
[10] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 7, Reprod Med Ctr, Shenzhen 518107, Peoples R China
[11] Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China
关键词
Cervical cancer; FIGO 2018 stage IIIC; Local tumor factors; Treatment; NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; LYMPH-NODE; METASTASES; CARCINOMA; SURVIVAL; SURGERY; SIZE;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-023-10801-w
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundTo compare the oncological outcomes of patients with FIGO 2018 stage IIIC cervical cancer (CC) involving different local tumor factors who underwent abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH), neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical surgery (NACT), or radical chemoradiotherapy (R-CT).MethodsBased on tumor staging, patients with stage IIIC were divided into T1, T2a, T2b, and T3 groups. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis were used to compare their overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of 5 years.ResultsWe included 4,086 patients (1,117, 1,019, 869, and 1,081 in the T1, T2a, T2b, and T3 groups, respectively). In the T1 group, NACT was correlated with a decrease in OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.631, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.150-2.315, P = 0.006) and DFS (HR = 1.665, 95% CI: 1.255-2.182, P < 0.001) than ARH. ARH and NACT were not correlated with OS (P = 0.226 and P = 0.921) or DFS (P = 0.343 and P = 0.535) than R-CT. In the T2a group, NACT was correlated with a decrease in OS (HR = 1.454, 95% CI: 1.057-2.000, P = 0.021) and DFS (HR = 1.529, 95% CI: 1.185-1.974, P = 0.001) than ARH. ARH and NACT were not correlated with OS (P = 0.736 and P = 0.267) or DFS (P = 0.714 and P = 0.087) than R-CT. In the T2b group, NACT was correlated with a decrease in DFS (HR = 1.847, 95% CI: 1.347-2.532, P < 0.001) than R-CT nevertheless was not correlated with OS (P = 0.146); ARH was not correlated with OS (P = 0.056) and DFS (P = 0.676). In the T3 group, the OS rates of ARH (n = 10), NACT (n = 18), and R-CT (n = 1053) were 67.5%, 53.1%, and 64.7% (P = 0.941), and the DFS rates were 68.6%, 45.5%, and 61.1%, respectively (P = 0.761).ConclusionR-CT oncological outcomes were not entirely superior to those of NACT or ARH under different local tumor factors with stage IIIC. NACT is not suitable for stage T1, T2a, and T2b. Nevertheless ARH is potentially applicable to stage T1, T2a, T2b and T3. The results of stage T3 require confirmation through further research due to disparity in case numbers in each subgroup.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Primary therapy for early-stage cervical cancer: radical hysterectomy vs radiation
    Bansal, Nisha
    Herzog, Thomas J.
    Shaw, Richard E.
    Burke, William M.
    Deutsch, Israel
    Wright, Jason D.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 201 (05) : 485.e1 - 485.e9
  • [2] Vaginal changes and sexuality in women with a history of cervical cancer
    Bergmark, K
    Åvall-Lundqvist, E
    Dickman, PW
    Henningsohn, L
    Steineck, G
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 340 (18) : 1383 - 1389
  • [3] Cancer of the cervix uteri
    Bhatla, Neerja
    Aoki, Daisuke
    Sharma, Daya Nand
    Sankaranarayanan, Rengaswamy
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2018, 143 : 22 - 36
  • [4] Comparison of survival outcomes with or without Para-aortic lymphadenectomy in surgical patients with stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer in China from 2004 to 2016
    Chen, Chunlin
    Duan, Hui
    Zhang, Wenling
    Zhao, Hongwei
    Wang, Li
    Kang, Shan
    Lin, Lihong
    Zhao, Weidong
    Ni, Yan
    Li, Donglin
    Chen, Jiaming
    Fan, Huijian
    Chen, Xiaolin
    Bin, Xiaonong
    Lang, Jinghe
    Liu, Ping
    [J]. BMC CANCER, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [5] Survival After Abdominal Q-M Type B versus C2 Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
    Chen, Chunlin
    Wang, Wuliang
    Liu, Ping
    Li, Pengfei
    Wang, Lu
    Jin, Shuangling
    Bin, Xiaonong
    Lang, Jinghe
    [J]. CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2019, 11 : 10909 - 10919
  • [6] Concomitant chemoradiation versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical carcinoma: results from two consecutive phase II studies
    Duenas-Gonzalez, A
    Lopez-Graniel, C
    Gonzalez-Enciso, A
    Mohar, A
    Rivera, L
    Mota, A
    Guadarrama, R
    Chanona, G
    de la Garza, J
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2002, 13 (08) : 1212 - 1219
  • [7] FIGO 2018 staging criteria for cervical cancer: Impact on stage migration and survival
    Grigsby, Perry W.
    Massad, Leslie S.
    Mutch, David G.
    Powell, Matthew A.
    Thaker, Premal H.
    McCourt, Carolyn
    Hagemann, Andrea
    Fuh, Katherine
    Kuroki, Lindsay
    Schwarz, Julie K.
    Markovina, Stephanie
    Lin, Alexander J.
    Dehdashti, Farrokh
    Siegel, Barry A.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2020, 157 (03) : 639 - 643
  • [8] Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Radical Surgery Versus Concomitant Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy in Patients With Stage IB2, IIA, or IIB Squamous Cervical Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Gupta, Sudeep
    Maheshwari, Amita
    Parab, Pallavi
    Mahantshetty, Umesh
    Hawaldar, Rohini
    Sastri , Supriya
    Kerkar, Rajendra
    Engineer, Reena
    Tongaonkar, Hemant
    Ghosh, Jaya
    Gulia, Seema
    Kumar, Neha
    Shylasree, T. Surappa
    Gawade, Renuka
    Kembhavi, Yogesh
    Gaikar, Madhuri
    Menon, Santosh
    Thakur, Meenakshi
    Shrivastava, Shyam
    Badwe, Rajendra
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (16) : 1548 - +
  • [9] Ovarian survival after pelvic radiation: transposition until the age of 35years
    Hoekman, Ellen J.
    Knoester, Dan
    Peters, Alexander A. W.
    Jansen, Frank W.
    de Kroon, Cornelis D.
    Hilders, Carina G. J. M.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2018, 298 (05) : 1001 - 1007
  • [10] Differential Diagnostic Performance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Detection of Lymph Node Metastases According to the Tumor Size in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Patients
    Hong, Kil-Sun
    Ju, Woong
    Choi, Hyuck Jae
    Kim, Jeong Kon
    Kim, Mi-hyun
    Cho, Kyuong-Sik
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2010, 20 (05) : 841 - 846