Attentional strategy choice is not predicted by cognitive ability or academic performance

被引:3
|
作者
McKinney, Molly R. [1 ,2 ]
Hansen, Heather A. [1 ]
Irons, Jessica L. [1 ]
Leber, Andrew B. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Psychol, Columbus, OH USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Dept Psychol, 225 Psychol Bldg,1835 Neil Ave, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Visual search; attentional strategy; cognitive ability; personality; individual differences; WORKING-MEMORY; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1080/13506285.2023.2175945
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
People exhibit vast individual variation in the degree to which they choose optimal attentional control strategies during visual search, although it is not well understood what predicts such variation. In the present study, we sought to determine whether markers of real-world achievement (assessed via undergraduate GPA) and cognitive ability (e.g., general fluid intelligence) could predict attentional strategy optimization (assessed via the Adaptive Choice Visual Search task; [Irons, J. L., & Leber, A. B. (2018). Characterizing individual variation in the strategic use of attentional control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(10), 1637-1654]). Results showed that, while general cognitive ability predicted visual search response time and accuracy, neither achievement nor cognitive ability metrics could predict attentional strategy optimization. Thus, the determinants of attentional strategy remain elusive, and we discuss potential steps to shed light on this important research topic.
引用
收藏
页码:671 / 679
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evidence for Attentional Phenotypes in Infancy and Their Role in Visual Cognitive Performance
    Ross-Sheehy, Shannon
    Reynolds, Esther
    Eschman, Bret
    BRAIN SCIENCES, 2020, 10 (09) : 1 - 24
  • [32] The impact of imagery on the performance and cognitive ability in the elderly
    Dana, Amir
    Salehian, Mir Hamid
    Asadi, Tayebeh Bani
    Ghanati, Parinaz
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2021, 15 (06): : 1654 - 1657
  • [33] Does learning behavior augment cognitive ability as an indicator of academic achievement?
    Yen, CJ
    Konold, TR
    McDermott, PA
    JOURNAL OF SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 42 (02) : 157 - 169
  • [34] Influence of cognitive ability on task performance of dynamic decision making in military vehicles under different task complexity
    Fu, Binhe
    Liu, Weiping
    Liu, Xixia
    COGNITION TECHNOLOGY & WORK, 2019, 21 (03) : 445 - 455
  • [35] On the Validity of Self-Report Assessment of Cognitive Abilities: Attentional Control Scale Associations With Cognitive Performance, Emotional Adjustment, and Personality
    Williams, Paula G.
    Rau, Holly K.
    Suchy, Yana
    Thorgusen, Sommer R.
    Smith, Timothy W.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2017, 29 (05) : 519 - 530
  • [36] Conscientiousness and Cognitive Ability as Predictors of Academic Achievement: Evidence of Synergistic Effects From Integrative Data Analysis
    Meyer, Jennifer
    Luedtke, Oliver
    Schmidt, Fabian T. C.
    Fleckenstein, Johanna
    Trautwein, Ulrich
    Koeller, Olaf
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2024, 38 (01) : 36 - 52
  • [37] Cognitive ability and earnings performance: Evidence from double auction market experiments
    Tai, Chung-Ching
    Chen, Shu-Heng
    Yang, Lee-Xieng
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL, 2018, 91 : 409 - 440
  • [38] The Relationship Between Cognitive Ability and Flight Driving Performance in Adolescent Pilot Cadets
    Tan, Jun
    Sun, Xianghong
    ENGINEERING PSYCHOLOGY AND COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS, EPCE 2021, 2021, 12767 : 52 - 64
  • [39] Fostering cognitive performance in older adults with a process- and a strategy-based cognitive training
    Studer-Luethi, Barbara
    Boesch, Valerie
    Lusti, Simon
    Meier, Beat
    AGING NEUROPSYCHOLOGY AND COGNITION, 2023, 30 (05) : 837 - 859
  • [40] The effects of faking on non-cognitive predictors of academic performance in University students
    Huws, Nia
    Reddy, Peter A.
    Talcott, Joel B.
    LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2009, 19 (04) : 476 - 480