Developing and demonstrating a maturity model for smart ports

被引:25
作者
Boullauazan, Yassin [1 ]
Sys, Christa [2 ]
Vanelslander, Thierry [2 ]
机构
[1] Antwerp Management Sch, Competence Ctr Smart Networks & Ecosyst, Boogkeers 5, BE-2000 Antwerp, Belgium
[2] Univ Antwerp, Dept Transport & Reg Econ, Antwerp, Belgium
关键词
Smart ports; digitalization; maturity model; policy tool; inter-organizational information systems; TRANSPORT; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1080/03088839.2022.2074161
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
Increasing congestion and the push for (i) a greener modal shift, (ii) more reliability and visibility of goods, and (iii) more sustainable activities in and related to the port are turning policymakers to the concept of the smart port. Such emerging concept describes a future state of the port that is adapted to these challenges. A smart port is a port that optimizes in-, intra- and outbound flow of goods and information, leads sustainable development and guarantees safe, resilient and secure activities through the capabilities of its (extended) port community and enabling technologies. However, turning a traditional port into a smart port is a strategic challenge for the port community at large. To contribute to this practically relevant and academic challenge, the present paper applies a literature review and the novel maturity model development methodology to develop a strategic tool. This newly-developed strategic tool (i) enhances the common understanding of the current and aspired maturity state, (ii) support decision-making of port policy and management actors and (iii) represent a maturation path for improvement for port communities. The case study results demonstrate the benefits and relevance of the tool. Finally, recommendations are made to apply this policy tool for digitalization strategy.
引用
收藏
页码:447 / 465
页数:19
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2020, REV MARITIME TRANSPO
  • [2] How to turn an innovative concept into a success? An application to seaport-related innovation
    Arduino, Giulia
    Aronietis, Raimonds
    Crozet, Yves
    Frouws, Koos
    Ferrari, Claudio
    Guihery, Laurent
    Kapros, Seraphim
    Kourounioti, Loanna
    Laroche, Florent
    Lambrou, Maria
    Lloyd, Michael
    Polydoropoulou, Amalia
    Roumboutsos, Athena
    Van de Voorde, Eddy
    Vanelslander, Thierry
    [J]. RESEARCH IN TRANSPORTATION ECONOMICS, 2013, 42 : 97 - 107
  • [3] A brief analysis of threats and vulnerabilities in the maritime domain
    Bakir, N. O.
    [J]. Managing Critical Infrastructure Risks: Decision Tools and Application for Port Security, 2007, : 17 - 49
  • [4] Developing Maturity Models for IT Management - A Procedure Model and its Application
    Becker, Joerg
    Knackstedt, Ralf
    Poeppelbuss, Jens
    [J]. BUSINESS & INFORMATION SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2009, 1 (03) : 213 - +
  • [5] Carlan V., 2017, COMPETITION REGUL NE, V18, P71, DOI [10.1177/1783591717734793, DOI 10.1177/1783591717734793]
  • [6] How port community systems can contribute to port competitiveness: Developing a cost-benefit framework
    Carlan, Valentin
    Sys, Christa
    Vanelslander, Thierry
    [J]. RESEARCH IN TRANSPORTATION BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 19 : 51 - 64
  • [7] Castelein R.B., Journal of Shipping and Trade 2019, DOI DOI 10.1186/S41072-019-0046-5
  • [8] Constructing Governance Framework of a Green and Smart Port
    Chen, Jihong
    Huang, Tiancun
    Xie, Xiaoke
    Lee, Paul Tae-Woo
    Hua, Chengying
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2019, 7 (04)
  • [9] Choi H.R., 2003, MARIT POLICY MANAG, V30, P197, DOI [10.1080/0308883032000089549, DOI 10.1016/J.IM.2009.03.001]
  • [10] Governing the European port-city interface: institutional impacts on spatial projects between city and port
    Daamen, Tom A.
    Vries, Isabelle
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2013, 27 : 4 - 13