Diagnostic and therapeutic impact of PET/CT with 18F-DCFPyL versus 18F-Fluorocholine in initial staging of intermediate-/high-risk prostate cancer: a pilot study

被引:2
作者
Lucas, Cristina Lucas [1 ]
Zoghby, Laura Garcia [3 ]
Amo-Salas, Mariano [2 ]
Castrejon, angel Maria Soriano [3 ]
Vicente, Ana Maria Garcia [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gen Hosp, Nucl Med Dept, C-Obispo Rafael Torija S-N, Ciudad Real 13005, Spain
[2] Castilla La Mancha Univ, Dept Math, Ciudad Real, Spain
[3] Complejo Hosp Toledo, Nucl Med Dept, Av Rio Guadiana S-N, Toledo 45007, Spain
关键词
Prostate cancer; Initial staging; 18F-Fluorocholine PET; CT; 18F-DCFPyL PET; PSMA PET; Therapeutic impact; EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY/COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; C-11-CHOLINE; METASTASES; LOCALIZATION; 11C-CHOLINE; TUMOR; CT;
D O I
10.1007/s12149-023-01859-4
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
AimTo assess the diagnostic and therapeutic impact of PET/CT with 18F-DCFPyL with respect to 18F-Fluorocholine in initial staging of intermediate-/high-risk prostate cancer (PCa).Material and methodsPatients with recent diagnosis of intermediate-/high-risk PCa without androgen deprivation therapy and previous 18F-Fluorocholine-PET/CT (negative for extraprostatic disease or with oligometastatic disease) were referred to 18F-DCFPyL-PET/CT. Patients' disease characteristic as grade group, D'Amico risk category (intermediate/high), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) closest to PET/CTs and its kinetics were obtained. The overall detection rate (DR) and molecular imaging TNM (miTNM) stage according to the prostate cancer molecular imaging standardized evaluation (PROMISE) criteria were assessed for both radiotracers, and their concordance (Kappa coefficient) was analyzed. The diagnostic and therapeutic impact of 18F-DCFPyL with respect to 18F-Fluorocholine was evaluated.ResultsFifty-eight patients were analyzed (84.5% high-risk). 18F-Fluorocholine showed a higher DR than 18F-DCFPyL of prostate gland involvement (100% versus 93.1%) and pelvic node disease (37.9% versus 31%; k = 0.436, p = 0.001). On the other hand, 18F-DCFPyL-PET/CT showed a higher DR of metastatic disease than 18F-Fluorocholine-PET/CT, 9/58 patients (15.5%): 3 M1a, 5 M1b and 1 M1c) versus 5/58 (8.6%) patients: 1 M1a and 4 M1b), k = 0.426; p = 0.001. No significant association was found between clinical characteristics (grade group, risk category, PSA level and kinetic) and 18F-Fluorocholine or 18F-DCFPyL results. The results of 18F-DCFPyL-PET/CT modified the previously planned treatment compared to 18F-Fluorocholine-PET/CT in 13 patients (22.4%).Conclusions18F-Fluorocholine and 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT showed a similar DR of prostate gland and lymph node involvement, although with moderate concordance for the latter. 18F-DCFPyL was superior to 18F-Fluorocholine in detecting regional and distant metastasis with a therapeutic impact in one of every five patients.
引用
收藏
页码:551 / 560
页数:10
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] A Prospective Comparison of 18F-prostate-specific Membrane Antigen-1007 Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography, Whole-body 1.5 T Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Diffusion-weighted Imaging, and Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography with Traditional Imaging in Primary Distant Metastasis Staging of Prostate Cancer (PROSTAGE)
    Anttinen, Mikael
    Ettala, Otto
    Malaspina, Simona
    Jambor, Ivan
    Sandell, Minna
    Kajander, Sami
    Rinta-Kiikka, Irina
    Schildt, Jukka
    Saukko, Ekaterina
    Rautio, Pentti
    Timonen, Kirsi L.
    Matikainen, Tuomas
    Noponen, Tommi
    Saunavaara, Jani
    Loyttyniemi, Eliisa
    Taimen, Pekka
    Kemppainen, Jukka
    Dean, Peter B.
    Sequeiros, Roberto Blanco
    Aronen, Hannu J.
    Seppanen, Marko
    Bostrom, Peter J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2021, 4 (04): : 635 - 644
  • [2] Is Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging Cost-effective in Prostate Cancer: An Analysis Informed by the proPSMA Trial
    Cardet, Rafael E. de Feria
    Hofman, Michael S.
    Segard, Tatiana
    Yim, Jackie
    Williams, Scott
    Francis, Roslyn J.
    Frydenberg, Mark
    Lawrentschuk, Nathan
    Murphy, Declan G.
    Lourenco, Richard De Abreu
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2021, 79 (03) : 413 - 418
  • [3] Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer
    D'Amico, AV
    Whittington, R
    Malkowicz, SB
    Schultz, D
    Blank, K
    Broderick, GA
    Tomaszewski, JE
    Renshaw, AA
    Kaplan, I
    Beard, CJ
    Wein, A
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (11): : 969 - 974
  • [4] Choline-PET in prostate cancer management: The point of view of the radiation oncologist
    De Bari, Berardino
    Alongi, Filippo
    Lestrade, Laetitia
    Giammarile, Francesco
    [J]. CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2014, 91 (03) : 234 - 247
  • [5] Clinical impact of PSMA PET/CT in primary prostate cancer compared to conventional nodal and distant staging: a retrospective single center study
    Donswijk, Maarten L.
    van Leeuwen, Pim J.
    Vegt, Erik
    Cheung, Zing
    Heijmink, Stijn W. T. P. J.
    van der Poel, Henk G.
    Stokkel, Marcel P. M.
    [J]. BMC CANCER, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [6] Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: AUA/ASTRO Guideline, Part I: Introduction, Risk Assessment, Staging, and Risk-Based Management
    Eastham, James A.
    Auffenberg, Gregory B.
    Barocas, Daniel A.
    Chou, Roger
    Crispino, Tony
    Davis, John W.
    Eggener, Scott
    Horwitz, Eric M.
    Kane, Christopher J.
    Kirkby, Erin
    Lin, Daniel W.
    McBride, Sean M.
    Morgans, Alicia K.
    Pierorazio, Phillip M.
    Rodrigues, George
    Wong, William W.
    Boorjian, Stephen A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 208 (01) : 10 - 18
  • [7] Prostate Cancer Molecular Imaging Standardized Evaluation (PROMISE): Proposed miTNM Classification for the Interpretation of PSMA-Ligand PET/CT
    Eiber, Matthias
    Herrmann, Ken
    Calais, Jeremie
    Hadaschik, Boris
    Giesel, Frederik L.
    Hartenbach, Markus
    Hope, Thomas
    Reiter, Robert
    Maurer, Tobias
    Weber, Wolfgang A.
    Fendler, Wolfgang P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2018, 59 (03) : 469 - 478
  • [8] Comparison between conventional imaging (abdominal-pelvic computed tomography and bone scan) and [18F] choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging for the initial staging of patients with intermediate-tohigh-risk prostate cancer: A retrospective analysis
    Evangelista, Laura
    Cimitan, Marino
    Zattoni, Fabio
    Guttilla, Andrea
    Zattoni, Filiberto
    Saladini, Giorgio
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 49 (05) : 345 - 353
  • [9] Utility of Choline Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Lymph Node Involvement Identification in Intermediate- to High-risk Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis
    Evangelista, Laura
    Guttilla, Andrea
    Zattoni, Fabio
    Muzzio, Pier Carlo
    Zattoni, Filiberto
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2013, 63 (06) : 1040 - 1048
  • [10] Farsad M, 2005, J NUCL MED, V46, P1642