Geographic Variation In Effective Contraceptive Use Among Medicaid Recipients In 2018

被引:5
作者
Rodriguez, Maria I. [1 ]
Meath, Thomas H. A. [1 ]
Watson, Kelsey [1 ]
Daly, Ashley [1 ]
Tracy, Kyle [1 ]
McConnell, K. John [1 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Portland, OR 97239 USA
关键词
UNITED-STATES; UNINTENDED PREGNANCY; SOCIAL DETERMINANTS; TITLE X; HEALTH; EPIDEMIOLOGY; ASSOCIATION;
D O I
10.1377/hlthaff.2022.00992
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Medicaid is the largest payer for publicly funded contraception, serving millions of women across the United States. However, relatively little is known about the extent to which effective contraceptive services vary geographically for Medicaid recipients. This study used national Medicaid claims to assess county-level variation in rates of provision of the most or moderately effective methods of contraception and provision of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) across forty states and Washington, D.C., in 2018. County-level rates of most or moderately effective contraceptive use varied almost fourfold across states, from a low of 10.8 percent to a high of 44.4 percent. Rates of LARC provision varied almost tenfold, from a low of 1.0 percent to a high of 9.6 percent. Despite the fact that contraception is a core benefit within Medicaid, access and use vary substantially across and within states. Medicaid agencies have a variety of options to ensure that people have access to a choice of the full range of contraceptive methods, including removing or loosening utilization controls, incorporating quality metrics or value -based payments into contraceptive services, and adjusting reimbursement to remove barriers to the clinical provision of LARC.
引用
收藏
页码:537 / 545
页数:9
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [11] Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, DQ ATL
  • [12] Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, 2016, STAT MED PAYM APPR I
  • [13] Who is providing contraception care in the United States? An observational study of the contraception workforce
    Chen, Candice
    Strasser, Julia
    Banawa, Rachel
    Luo, Qian
    Bodas, Mandar
    Castruccio-Prince, Catarina
    Das, Kirsten
    Pittman, Patricia
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 226 (02)
  • [14] The Association Between Income and Life Expectancy in the United States, 2001-2014
    Chetty, Raj
    Stepner, Michael
    Abraham, Sarah
    Lin, Shelby
    Scuderi, Benjamin
    Turner, Nicholas
    Bergeron, Augustin
    Cutler, David
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 315 (16): : 1750 - 1766
  • [15] The Effects of Exposure to Better Neighborhoods on Children: New Evidence from the Moving to Opportunity Experiment
    Chetty, Raj
    Hendren, Nathaniel
    Katz, Lawrence F.
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2016, 106 (04) : 855 - 902
  • [16] Understanding and representing 'place' in health research: A relational approach
    Cummins, Steven
    Curtis, Sarah
    Diez-Roux, Ana V.
    Macintyre, Sally
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2007, 65 (09) : 1825 - 1838
  • [17] Payment for Contraceptive Services in Safety Net Clinics Roles of Affordable Care Act, Title X, and State Programs
    Darney, Blair G.
    Biel, Frances M.
    Rodriguez, Maria I.
    Jacob, R. Lorie
    Cottrell, Erika K.
    DeVoe, Jennifer E.
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 2020, 58 (05) : 453 - 460
  • [18] Racial/ethnic disparities in contraceptive use: variation by age and women's reproductive experiences
    Dehlendorf, Christine
    Park, Seo Young
    Emeremni, Chetachi A.
    Comer, Diane
    Vincett, Kathryn
    Borrero, Sonya
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 210 (06) : 526.e1 - 526.e9
  • [19] Disparities in family planning
    Dehlendorf, Christine
    Rodriguez, Maria Isabel
    Levy, Kira
    Borrero, Sonya
    Steinauer, Jody
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 202 (03) : 214 - 220
  • [20] Department of Health and Human Services Office of Population Affairs, MOST MOD EFF CONTR M