The Lawyers' Movement in Pakistan: how legal actors mobilise in a hybrid regime

被引:2
作者
Khan, Maryam S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Dev & Econ Alternat IDEAS, Lahore, Pakistan
关键词
legal mobilisation; socio-legal studies; legal complex; law and social movements; hybrid regime; post-colonial South Asia; Lawyers' Movement; AUTONOMY; RULE; LAW;
D O I
10.1017/S1744552323000101
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Drawing primarily from qualitative interviews conducted between 2017 and 2018, this empirical study tells a granular story of how legal actors mobilised during the Lawyers' Movement in Pakistan (2007-2009) from the perspective of lawyer-leaders who organised, steered and sustained support for the Movement through rapidly shifting political conditions. By underscoring the contribution of lawyer-leaders in empowering judges, the article seeks both to displace uncritical assumptions and arguments about courts as the nucleus of legal mobilisation in Pakistan, and to highlight the crucial role of political parties in the restoration of the judiciary against the backdrop of disintegrating lawyer-judge coalitions. Given Pakistan's political context of a 'hybrid regime', the article reflects on the unsuitability of the 'legal complex' theory of 'political liberalism' for analysing and understanding the Movement, and locates it instead in the literature on legal mobilisation in authoritarian regimes.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 333
页数:19
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   How to understand Pakistan's hybrid regime: the importance of a multidimensional continuum [J].
Adeney, Katharine .
DEMOCRATIZATION, 2017, 24 (01) :119-137
[2]  
Ahmed Z.S., 2012, Pakistaniaat: A Journal of Pakistan Studies, V4, P61
[3]   Fighting for the rule of law: civil resistance and the lawyers' movement in Pakistan [J].
Ahmed, Zahid Shahab .
DEMOCRATIZATION, 2010, 17 (03) :492-513
[4]  
Aitzaz A, 2008, LUBP 1101
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2010, IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CH
[6]  
Aziz S, 2012, FATES OF POLITICAL LIBERALISM IN THE BRITISH POST-COLONY: THE POLITICS OF THE LEGAL COMPLEX, P305
[7]  
Bhuwania A, 2020, INDIAN SUPREME COURT
[8]  
B�li A., 2012, VA J INT LAW, V52, P235
[9]   The end of the transition paradigm [J].
Carothers, T .
JOURNAL OF DEMOCRACY, 2002, 13 (01) :5-21
[10]  
Clarke, 2012, PAKISTANS STABILITY, P28