Public support and energy innovation: Why do firms react differently?

被引:13
作者
Zhang, Hongyan [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Lin [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Petr, Sch Econ & Management, Qingdao, Peoples R China
[2] City Univ Hong Kong, Sch Energy & Environm, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] City Univ Hong Kong, Dept Publ & Int Affairs, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Innovation; Subsidy; Specialization; Corporate strategy; Corporate social responsibility; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; DEVELOPMENT SUBSIDIES; RENEWABLE ENERGY; TRANSITION; DISCLOSURE; INVESTMENT; INDUSTRY; IMPACT; WIND; LOG;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106528
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The literature provides mixed evidence on whether the public supports foster or fail to promote innovation. This paper explores why the effects of government R&D subsidies on corporate innovation performance vary across firms. We rely on publicly listed firms in China and find that government subsidies promote technology innovations in firms specialized in either renewable energy or fossil fuel-related innovations, but fail to motivate firms with mixed directions on both types of patenting lines to innovate. This could be explained by corporate pursuit of innovation goals, and further substantiated by the heterogeneous effects of managerial features of the firms. The effectiveness of R&D subsidies is much smaller in mixed firms with finance-oriented CEO and lower concentration of shareholders, and when firms disclose corporate social responsibility. We present empirical evidence that government R&D subsidies crowd out mixed firms' private R&D expenditure and increase their non-operating expenses. Our findings warn that it is important to improve the supervision mechanism for the use of R&D subsidies in firms and learn to manage multiple objectives, especially for firms with mixed purposes.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 66 条
  • [1] Carbon abatement with renewables: Evaluating wind and solar subsidies in Germany and Spain
    Abrell, Jan
    Kosch, Mirjam
    Rausch, Sebastian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2019, 169 : 172 - 202
  • [2] Transition to Clean Technology
    Acemoglu, Daron
    Akcigit, Ufuk
    Hanley, Douglas
    Kerr, William
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2016, 124 (01) : 52 - 104
  • [3] Innovation by entrants and incumbents
    Acemoglu, Daron
    Cao, Dan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 2015, 157 : 255 - 294
  • [4] Aghion P, 2016, J POLIT ECON, V124, P1
  • [5] Innovation and Institutional Ownership
    Aghion, Philippe
    Van Reenen, John
    Zingales, Luigi
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2013, 103 (01) : 277 - 304
  • [6] Activity Overinvestment: The Case of R&D
    Ahuja, Gautam
    Novelli, Elena
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2017, 43 (08) : 2456 - 2468
  • [7] Competing land uses and fossil fuel, and optimal energy conversion rates during the transition toward a green economy under a pollution stock constraint
    Amigues, Jean-Pierre
    Moreaux, Michel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 97 : 92 - 115
  • [8] The impacts of government R&D subsidies on green innovation: Evidence from Chinese energy-intensive firms
    Bai, Yu
    Song, Siyi
    Jiao, Jianling
    Yang, Ranran
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 233 (819-829) : 819 - 829
  • [9] Law, finance and innovation: the dark side of shareholder protection
    Belloc, Filippo
    [J]. CAMBRIDGE JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2013, 37 (04) : 863 - 888
  • [10] Innovation in the Global Firm
    Bilir, L. Kamran
    Morales, Eduardo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2020, 128 (04) : 1566 - 1625