The soft landing: Does intrafamily succession matter for corporate risk-taking?

被引:2
|
作者
Zheng, Xiaojia [1 ]
Zhu, Bing [2 ]
Yang, Ge [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Int Business & Econ, Sch Int Trade & Econ, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
[2] Cent Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Accountancy, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Int Business & Econ, Business Sch, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
基金
中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助;
关键词
Family firms; Family succession; Corporate risk-taking; Heir recognition; PRODUCT MARKET COMPETITION; FAMILY FIRM SUCCESSION; DEVELOPMENT INVESTMENTS; PERFORMANCE; OWNERSHIP; CEO; DIVERSIFICATION; DETERMINANTS; GOVERNANCE; RELIGION;
D O I
10.1016/j.pacfin.2023.101967
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Succession has been recognized as one key challenge to family firms. To manage succession risks, founders aiming for intrafamily succession might adopt risk-averse strategies in advance. Using a sample of A-share listed family firms in China, we find that family firms with apparent family successors are indeed more risk-averse than those without such successors: the former group has fewer investments in research and development (R&D), lower debt, more cash holdings, and less volatile earnings than the latter. These effects are weaker for firms in a more market-oriented environment, firms with stronger family control, or firms faced with more intense market competition. Further analyses show that the reduced risk-taking for intrafamily succession is stronger when successors have been involved in family businesses. Firms with male successors are also more risk-averse than those with female successors except in R&D investments. By illus-trating that founders proactively curb firm risks to increase risk capacity for family successors, this paper not only contributes to the literature on family succession, but also extends the liter-ature about determinants of corporate risk-taking decisions.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Creative culture, risk-taking, and corporate financial decisions
    Ucar, Erdem
    EUROPEAN FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 25 (03) : 684 - 717
  • [22] Religiosity and corporate risk-taking: evidence from Italy
    Cebula, Richard J.
    Rossi, Fabrizio
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2021, 45 (04) : 751 - 763
  • [23] Competition laws and corporate risk-taking around the world*
    Shen, Zhe
    Sowah, Joseph Sowahfio
    Dak-Adzaklo, Cephas Simon Peter
    Li, Shan
    PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2023, 80
  • [24] Management Characteristics and Corporate Risk-taking: An Overall Review
    Su, Kun
    Li, Rui-meng
    Wang, Jing-fang
    2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON POWER, ENERGY ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT (PEEM 2016), 2016, : 175 - 181
  • [25] Political institutions and corporate risk-taking: International evidence
    Bao, Helen X. H.
    Cardoza, Rohan
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCE, 2023, 23 (04) : 777 - 793
  • [26] Does local religiosity matter for bank risk-taking?
    Adhikari, Binay Kumar
    Agrawal, Anup
    JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2016, 38 : 272 - 293
  • [27] How does national culture affect corporate risk-taking?
    José María Díez-Esteban
    Jorge Bento Farinha
    Conrado Diego García-Gómez
    Eurasian Business Review, 2019, 9 : 49 - 68
  • [28] Does customer concentration affect corporate risk-taking? Evidence from China
    Cao, Xiyang
    Ni, Jian
    Wang, Fei
    Xu, Yue
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2023, 58
  • [29] The performance and corporate risk-taking of firms: evidence from Malaysian agricultural firms
    Ahmad, Hanis Hazwani
    Azhari, Adilah
    JOURNAL OF AGRIBUSINESS IN DEVELOPING AND EMERGING ECONOMIES, 2022, 12 (05) : 791 - 808
  • [30] Corporate Risk-Taking and Killing
    C M V Clarkson
    Risk Management, 2000, 2 (1) : 7 - 16