Combination of Hairy Root and Whole-Plant Transformation Protocols to Achieve Efficient CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing in Soybean

被引:4
|
作者
Kong, Qihui [1 ,2 ]
Li, Jie [1 ]
Wang, Shoudong [2 ,3 ]
Feng, Xianzhong [2 ,3 ]
Shou, Huixia [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Coll Life Sci, State Key Lab Plant Physiol & Biochem, Hangzhou 310058, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Lab, Hangzhou 310012, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Northeast Inst Geog & Agroecol, Key Lab Soybean Mol Design Breeding, Changchun 130102, Peoples R China
来源
PLANTS-BASEL | 2023年 / 12卷 / 05期
关键词
soybean transformation; CRISPR; Cas9; hairy root; genome-editing; AGROBACTERIUM-RHIZOGENES; MEDIATED TRANSFORMATION; TARGETED MUTAGENESIS; SEED; TOOL; DNA;
D O I
10.3390/plants12051017
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
The new gene-editing technology CRISPR/Cas system has been widely used for genome engineering in various organisms. Since the CRISPR/Cas gene-editing system has a certain possibility of low efficiency and the whole plant transformation of soybean is time-consuming and laborious, it is important to evaluate the editing efficiency of designed CRISPR constructs before the stable whole plant transformation process starts. Here, we provide a modified protocol for generating transgenic hairy soybean roots to assess the efficiency of guide RNA (gRNA) sequences of the CRISPR/Cas constructs within 14 days. The cost- and space-effective protocol was first tested in transgenic soybean harboring the GUS reporter gene for the efficiency of different gRNA sequences. Targeted DNA mutations were detected in 71.43-97.62% of the transgenic hairy roots analyzed as evident by GUS staining and DNA sequencing of the target region. Among the four designed gene-editing sites, the highest editing efficiency occurred at the 3 ' terminal of the GUS gene. In addition to the reporter gene, the protocol was tested for the gene-editing of 26 soybean genes. Among the gRNAs selected for stable transformation, the editing efficiency of hairy root transformation and stable transformation ranged from 5% to 88.8% and 2.7% to 80%, respectively. The editing efficiencies of stable transformation were positively correlated with those of hairy root transformation with a Pearson correlation coefficient (r) of 0.83. Our results demonstrated that soybean hairy root transformation could rapidly assess the efficiency of designed gRNA sequences on genome editing. This method can not only be directly applied to the functional study of root-specific genes, but more importantly, it can be applied to the pre-screening of gRNA in CRISPR/Cas gene editing.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Development of an Agrobacterium-delivered CRISPR/Cas9 system for wheat genome editing
    Zhang, Zhengzhi
    Hua, Lei
    Gupta, Ajay
    Tricoli, David
    Edwards, Keith J.
    Yang, Bing
    Li, Wanlong
    PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL, 2019, 17 (08) : 1623 - 1635
  • [42] Highly Efficient Genome Editing Using Geminivirus-Based CRISPR/Cas9 System in Cotton Plant
    Li, Bo
    Fu, Chunyang
    Zhou, Jiawei
    Hui, Fengjiao
    Wang, Qiongqiong
    Wang, Fuqiu
    Wang, Guanying
    Xu, Zhongping
    Che, Lianlian
    Yuan, Daojun
    Wang, Yanqin
    Zhang, Xianlong
    Jin, Shuangxia
    CELLS, 2022, 11 (18)
  • [43] Genome editing (CRISPR/Cas9) in plant disease management: challenges and future prospects
    Das, Kallol
    Ayim, Benjamin Yaw
    Borodynko-Filas, Natasza
    Das, Srijan Chandra
    Aminuzzaman, F. M.
    JOURNAL OF PLANT PROTECTION RESEARCH, 2023, 63 (02) : 159 - 172
  • [44] Recent Advances in Genome Editing Using CRISPR/Cas9
    Ding, Yuduan
    Li, Hong
    Chen, Ling-Ling
    Xie, Kabin
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2016, 7
  • [45] Insights into maize genome editing via CRISPR/Cas9
    Agarwal, Astha
    Yadava, Pranjal
    Kumar, Krishan
    Singh, Ishwar
    Kaul, Tanushri
    Pattanayak, Arunava
    Agrawal, Pawan Kumar
    PHYSIOLOGY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF PLANTS, 2018, 24 (02) : 175 - 183
  • [46] The questions you should ask yourself for efficient CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing
    Pavlovic, Guillaume
    Mercier, Pascale
    Risson, Valerie
    Schmitt, Philippe
    Birling, Marie-Christine
    Langa, Francina
    Markossian, Suzy
    Teboul, Lydia
    Harscoet, Erwana
    Lipson, Karelia
    Offner, Sandra
    Angelis, Fabien
    Barde, Isabelle
    Bringart, Matthieu
    Concordet, Jean-Paul
    Fiore, Frederic
    Jagla, Teresa
    Tesson, Laurent
    Joly, Jean-Stephane
    Herault, Yann
    TRANSGENIC RESEARCH, 2016, 25 (02) : 255 - 255
  • [47] Targeted genome editing in algae using CRISPR/Cas9
    Tanwar A.
    Sharma S.
    Kumar S.
    Indian Journal of Plant Physiology, 2018, 23 (4): : 653 - 669
  • [48] A CRISPR/Cas9 toolkit for multiplex genome editing in plants
    Xing, Hui-Li
    Dong, Li
    Wang, Zhi-Ping
    Zhang, Hai-Yan
    Han, Chun-Yan
    Liu, Bing
    Wang, Xue-Chen
    Chen, Qi-Jun
    BMC PLANT BIOLOGY, 2014, 14
  • [49] Modern Trends in Plant Genome Editing: An Inclusive Review of the CRISPR/Cas9 Toolbox
    Razzaq, Ali
    Saleem, Fozia
    Kanwal, Mehak
    Mustafa, Ghulam
    Yousaf, Sumaira
    Arshad, Hafiz Muhammad Imran
    Hameed, Muhammad Khalid
    Khan, Muhammad Sarwar
    Joyia, Faiz Ahmad
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2019, 20 (16)
  • [50] Mechanisms of the Specificity of the CRISPR/Cas9 System in Genome Editing
    Kulishova, L. M.
    Vokhtantsev, I. P.
    Kim, D. V.
    Zharkov, D. O.
    MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2023, 57 (02) : 258 - 271