The transition to clean energy and the external balance of goods and services as determinants of energy and environmental sustainability

被引:16
作者
Niu, Xiaoqin [1 ]
Dong, Weiwei [2 ]
Niu, Xiaodong [2 ]
Zafar, Muhammad Wasif [3 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Inst Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Shanghai 201418, Peoples R China
[2] Northwest Univ Polit & Law, Sch Econ, Xian 710122, Peoples R China
[3] Riphah Int Univ, Riphah Sch Business & Management, Lahore, Pakistan
关键词
Clean Energy Transition; External Balance of Goods and Services; Urbanization; Environmental Sustainability; China; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT; CO2; EMISSIONS; CONSUMPTION; COINTEGRATION; VECTORS; IMPACT; NEXUS;
D O I
10.1016/j.gr.2023.03.003
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Environmental sustainability for the energy industry, especially oil and gas, is a great concern for governments and policymakers. The clean energy transition includes shifting from a system based on fossil fuels to one dominated by clean, renewable energy to reduce carbon emissions to help meet global climate targets. We examine the impact of energy transition and the external balance of goods and services on China's environmental quality while considering the moderating role of urbanization, natural resources, and energy consumption from 1970 to 2019. In this study, we applied advanced econometric methods and conducted an extensive empirical analysis. Overall, the results conclude that energy transition, the external balance of goods and services, natural resources, and renewable energy consumption are negatively associated with the ecological footprint. However, urbanization and non-renewable energy consumption are positively linked with that footprint. Environmental sustainability is improved by energy transition, natural resource abundance, and renewable energy consumption. Urbanization and nonrenewable energy consumption degrade environmental sustainability. Policymakers are suggested to support accelerating the energy transition by deploying renewable energy, encouraging policies that establish the appropriate environment for the extensive penetration of renewables, and balancing the national urban structure that strengthens the self-sustained urban development to guarantee a sustainable future. Future research directions and study limitations are discussed. (c) 2023 International Association for Gondwana Research. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 87
页数:11
相关论文
共 73 条
  • [1] Structural breaks in CO2 emissions: Are they caused by climate change protests or other factors?
    Adedoyin, Festus
    Ozturk, Ilhan
    Abubakar, Isah
    Kumeka, Terver
    Folarin, Oludele
    Bekun, Festus Victor
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 266
  • [2] Financial development and environmental degradation: Do human capital and institutional quality make a difference?
    Ahmad, Mahmood
    Ahmed, Zahoor
    Yang, Xiyue
    Hussain, Nazim
    Sinha, Avik
    [J]. GONDWANA RESEARCH, 2022, 105 : 299 - 310
  • [3] Modelling the dynamic linkages between eco-innovation, urbanization, economic growth and ecological footprints for G7 countries: Does financial globalization matter?
    Ahmad, Mahmood
    Jiang, Ping
    Murshed, Muntasir
    Shehzad, Khurram
    Akram, Rabia
    Cui, Lianbiao
    Khan, Zeeshan
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2021, 70
  • [4] Digital financial inclusion and economic growth: provincial data analysis of China
    Ahmad, Mahmood
    Majeed, Abdul
    Khan, Muhammad Asif
    Sohaib, Muhammad
    Shehzad, Khurram
    [J]. CHINA ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2021, 14 (03) : 291 - 310
  • [5] The dynamic impact of natural resources, technological innovations and economic growth on ecological footprint: An advanced panel data estimation
    Ahmad, Mahmood
    Jiang, Ping
    Majeed, Abdul
    Umar, Muhammad
    Khan, Zeeshan
    Muhammad, Sulaman
    [J]. RESOURCES POLICY, 2020, 69 (69)
  • [6] Innovation, foreign direct investment (FDI), and the energy-pollution-growth nexus in OECD region: a simultaneous equation modeling approach
    Ahmad, Manzoor
    Khattak, Shoukat Iqbal
    Khan, Anwar
    Rahman, Zia Ur
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECOLOGICAL STATISTICS, 2020, 27 (02) : 203 - 232
  • [7] Can innovation shocks determine CO2 emissions (CO2e) in the OECD economies? A new perspective
    Ahmad, Manzoor
    Khan, Zeeshan
    Rahman, Zia Ur
    Khattak, Shoukat Iqbal
    Khan, Zia Ullah
    [J]. ECONOMICS OF INNOVATION AND NEW TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 30 (01) : 89 - 109
  • [8] Does the inflow of remittances cause environmental degradation: Empirical evidence from China
    Ahmad, Manzoor
    Haq, Zahoor Ul
    Khan, Zeeshan
    Khattak, Shoukat Iqbal
    Rahman, Zia Ur
    Khan, Shehzad
    [J]. ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA, 2019, 32 (01): : 2099 - 2121
  • [9] Households? perception-based factors influencing biogas adoption: Innovation diffusion framework
    Ahmad, Munir
    Khan, Irfan
    Khan, Muhammad Qaiser Shahzad
    Jabeen, Gul
    Jabeen, Hafiza Samra
    Isik, Cem
    [J]. ENERGY, 2023, 263
  • [10] Analyzing the linkage between military spending, economic growth, and ecological footprint in Pakistan: evidence from cointegration and bootstrap causality
    Ahmed, Zahoor
    Zafar, Muhammad Wasif
    Mansoor, Sadia
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2020, 27 (33) : 41551 - 41567