3D reconstruction in underground utilities

被引：6

作者：

Su, Yang ^{[1
]}

Wang, Jun ^{[2
]}

Wang, Xiangyu ^{[3
,4
]}

Yao, Yuan ^{[2
]}

Shou, Wenchi ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Curtin Univ, Australasian Joint Res Ctr Bldg Informat Modelling, Sch Design & Built Environm, Perth, WA 6845, Australia

[2] Western Sydney Univ, Sch Engn Design & Built Environm, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia

[3] East China Jiaotong Univ, Sch Civil Engn & Architecture, Nanchang, Jiangxi, Peoples R China

[4] Curtin Univ, Sch Design & Built Environm, Perth, WA 6845, Australia

来源：

AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION | 2023年 / 156卷

基金：

澳大利亚研究理事会;

关键词：

Underground utilities (UU); 3D reconstruction; Subsurface utilities; Pipelines; Underground mapping; GPR; TECHNOLOGY; PIPELINE; SYSTEM; INFORMATION; PIPES; ALGORITHM; ACCURACY; LEAKS;

D O I：

10.1016/j.autcon.2023.105100

中图分类号：

TU [建筑科学];

学科分类号：

0813 ;

摘要：

Underground utilities (UU) play a vital role in modern life. Creating an accurate, up-to-date, and comprehensive digital representation of underground infrastructure has become a top priority for the infrastructure planning, (re)development, construction recording, and safety management of UU projects. However, both industry and academia lack a common understanding of the latest progress, challenges, and decision-making frameworks for UU 3D reconstruction technologies. Therefore, 323 related articles are investigated and provides a scientific basis for selecting different technologies for various scenarios. First, the advantages, limitations, and the best performance of each technique are analyzed. Second, the current applications of UU 3D reconstruction are reviewed. Third, a decision-making framework is proposed for selecting 3D reconstruction technologies to help stakeholders scientifically choose appropriate technology routes. Finally, limitations and future work in this field are discussed.

引用

页数：15

共 147 条

[1]

Abd Jalil MI, 2019, 2019 IEEE 10TH CONTROL AND SYSTEM GRADUATE RESEARCH COLLOQUIUM (ICSGRC), P156, DOI [10.1109/icsgrc.2019.8837098, 10.1109/ICSGRC.2019.8837098]

[2] Reducing Damage to Underground Utilities: Lessons Learned from Damage Data and Excavators in North Carolina [J].

Al-Bayati, Ahmed Jalil ;

Panzer, Louis .

JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 145 (12)

[3]

Ali H., 2021, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., V2107, DOI [10.1088/1742-6596/2107/1/012056,012056, DOI 10.1088/1742-6596/2107/1/012056,012056]

[4]

[Anonymous], 2020, Underground Pipeline Committee of China Planning Association

[5]

Ariffin E., 2021, IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., V767, DOI [10.1088/1755-1315/767/1/012022,012022, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/767/1/012022,012022]

[6] Reliability of Infrared Thermography in Detecting Leaks in Buried Water Reticulation Pipes [J].

Bach, Peter M. ;

Kodikara, Jayantha K. .

IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATIONS AND REMOTE SENSING, 2017, 10 (09) :4210-4224

[7] Improved background and clutter reduction for pipe detection under pavement using Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) [J].

Bai, Hao ;

Sinfield, Joseph, V .

JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2020, 172

[8] A CNN model for predicting size of buried objects from GPR B-Scans [J].

Barkataki, Nairit ;

Tiru, Banty ;

Sarma, Utpal .

JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2022, 200

[9] Translating the invisible: Governing underground utilities in the Amsterdam airport Schiphol terminal project [J].

Biersteker, Erwin ;

Koppenjan, Joop ;

van Marrewijk, Alfons .

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2021, 39 (06) :581-593

[10] Inferring the most probable maps of underground utilities using Bayesian mapping model [J].

Bilal, Muhammad ;

Khan, Wasiq ;

Muggleton, Jennifer ;

Rustighi, Emiliano ;

Jenks, Hugo ;

Pennock, Steve R. ;

Atkins, Phil R. ;

Cohn, Anthony .

JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 150 :52-66

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 →