Quantitative analysis of zirconia and titanium implant artefacts in three-dimensional virtual models of multi-slice CT and cone beam CT: does scan protocol matter?

被引:2
作者
Matta, Ragai Edward [1 ]
Giacaman, Stephanie Knapp [1 ]
Wiesmueller, Marco [2 ]
Lutz, Rainer [3 ]
Uder, Michael [2 ]
Wichmann, Manfred [1 ]
Seidel, Anna [1 ]
机构
[1] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen Nurnberg FAU, Dept Prosthodont, Univ Hosp Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
[2] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen Nurnberg FAU, Inst Radiol, Univ Hosp Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
[3] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen Nurnberg FAU, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Univ Hosp Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
关键词
artifact; zirconium; titanium; dental implant; three-dimensional imaging; computed tomography; cone-beam computed tomography; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY DATA; HOUNSFIELD UNITS; IMAGE QUALITY; ACCURACY; REDUCTION; CBCT; RECONSTRUCTIONS; DENTISTRY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1259/dmfr.20230275
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: Artefacts from dental implants in three-dimensional (3D) imaging may lead to incorrect representation of anatomical dimensions and impede virtual planning in navigated implantology. The aim of this study was quantitative assessment of artefacts in 3D STL models from cone beam CT (CBCT) and multislice CT (MSCT) using different scanning protocols and titanium-zirconium (Ti-Zr) and zirconium (ZrO2) implant materials. Methods: Three ZrO2 and three Ti-Zr implants were respectively placed in the mandibles of two fresh human specimens. Before (baseline) and after implant placement, 3D digital imaging scans were performed (10 repetitions per timepoint: voxel size 0.2mm(3) and 0.3mm(3) for CBCT; 80 and 140 kV in MSCT). DICOM data were converted into 3D STL models and evaluated in computer-aided design software. After precise merging of the baseline and post-op models, the surface deviation was calculated, representing the extent of artefacts in the 3D models. Results: Compared with baseline, ZrO2 emitted 36.5-37.3% (0.6-0.8) artefacts in the CBCT and 39.2-50.2% (+/- 0.5-1.2) in the MSCT models. Ti-Zr implants produced 4.1-7.1% (+/- 0.3-3.0) artefacts in CBCT and 5.4-15.7% (+/- 0.5-1.3) in MSCT. Significantly more artefacts were found in the MSCT vs CBCT models for both implant materials (p < 0.05). Significantly fewer artefacts were visible in the 3D models from scans with higher kilovolts in MSCT and smaller voxel size in CBCT. Conclusions: Among the four applied protocols, the lowest artefact proportion of ZrO2 and Ti-Zr implants in STL models was observed with CBCT and the 0.3mm(3) voxel size.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Influence of zirconia crown artifacts on cone beam computed tomography scans and image superimposition of tomographic image and tooth surface scan: An in vitro study [J].
Alaidrous, May ;
Finkelman, Matthew ;
Kudara, Yukio ;
Campos, Hugo C. ;
Kim, Yongjeong ;
De Souza, Andre Barbisan .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2021, 125 (04) :684.e1-684.e8
[2]  
Angelopoulos Christos, 2012, Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am, V20, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.cxom.2011.12.008
[3]   Use of cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: current concepts, indications and limitations for clinical practice and research [J].
Bornstein, Michael M. ;
Horner, Keith ;
Jacobs, Reinhilde .
PERIODONTOLOGY 2000, 2017, 73 (01) :51-72
[4]   Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Implant Dentistry: A Systematic Review Focusing on Guidelines, Indications, and Radiation Dose Risks [J].
Bornstein, Michael M. ;
Scarfe, William C. ;
Vaughn, Vida M. ;
Jacobs, Reinhilde .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2014, 29 :55-77
[5]   Quantitative analysis of metallic artifacts caused by dental metals: comparison of cone-beam and multi-detector row CT scanners [J].
Chindasombatjaroen, Jira ;
Kakimoto, Naoya ;
Murakami, Shumei ;
Maeda, Yoshinobu ;
Furukawa, Souhei .
ORAL RADIOLOGY, 2011, 27 (02) :114-120
[6]  
Core Team R. R, 2017, A language and environment for statistical computing
[7]   Impact of voxel size and scan time on the accuracy of three-dimensional radiological imaging data from cone-beam computed tomography [J].
Dach, Eva ;
Bergauer, Bastian ;
Seidel, Anna ;
Von Wilmowsky, Cornelius ;
Adler, Werner ;
Lell, Michael ;
Wichmann, Manfred ;
Matta, Ragai-Edward .
JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 46 (12) :2190-2196
[8]  
De Man B, 1999, IEEE T NUCL SCI, V46, P691, DOI 10.1109/23.775600
[9]   Metallic dental artifact reduction in computed tomography (Smart MAR): Improvement of image quality and diagnostic confidence in patients with suspected head and neck pathology and oral implants [J].
Feldhaus, Felix ;
Boening, Georg ;
Jonczyk, Martin ;
Kahn, Johannes ;
Fehrenbach, Uli ;
Maurerb, M. ;
Benz, D. ;
Hamm, Bernd ;
Streitparth, Florian .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 118 :153-160
[10]   Registration of cone beam computed tomography data and intraoral surface scans - A prerequisite for guided implant surgery with CAD/CAM drilling guides [J].
Flugge, Tabea ;
Derksen, Wiebe ;
te Poel, Jobine ;
Hassan, Bassam ;
Nelson, Katja ;
Wismeijer, Daniel .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2017, 28 (09) :1113-1118