Factors that determine first intubation attempt success in high-risk neonates

被引:7
|
作者
Chen, Donna Y. [1 ,2 ]
Devsam, Bianca [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Sett, Arun [1 ,5 ,6 ]
Perkins, Elizabeth J. [1 ,3 ]
Johnson, Mitchell D. [1 ,3 ]
Tingay, David G. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Murdoch Childrens Res Inst, Neonatal Res, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Dept Paediat, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Royal Childrens Hosp, Neonatol, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[4] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sch Hlth Sci, Dept Nursing, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Univ Melbourne, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[6] Western Hlth, Joan Kirner Womens & Childrens, Newborn Serv, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
TRACHEAL INTUBATION; DIFFICULT AIRWAY; VIDEOLARYNGOSCOPY; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1038/s41390-023-02831-8
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
BackgroundApproximately 50% of all neonatal endotracheal intubation attempts are unsuccessful and associated with airway injury and cardiorespiratory instability. The aim of this study was to describe intubation practice at a high-risk Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) and identify factors associated with successful intubation at the first attempt.MethodsRetrospective cohort study of all infants requiring intubation within the Royal Children's Hospital NICU over three years. Data was collected from the National Emergency Airway Registry for Neonates (NEAR4NEOS). Outcomes were number of attempts, level of operator training, equipment used, difficult airway grade, and clinical factors. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to determine factors independently associated with first attempt success.ResultsThree hundred and sixty intubation courses, with 538 attempts, were identified. Two hundred and twenty-five (62.5%) were successful on first attempt, with similar rates at subsequent attempts. On multivariate analysis, increasing operator seniority increased the chance of first attempt success. Higher glottic airway grades were associated with lower chance of first attempt success, but neither a known difficult airway nor use of a stylet were associated with first attempt success.ConclusionIn a NICU with a high rate of difficult airways, operator experience rather than equipment was the greatest determinant of intubation success.ImpactNeonatal intubation is a high-risk lifesaving procedure, and this is the first report of intubation practices at a quaternary surgical NICU that provides regional referral services for complex medical and surgical admissions.Our results showed that increasing operator seniority and lower glottic airway grades were associated with increased first attempt intubation success rates, while factors such as gestational age, weight, stylet use, and known history of difficult airway were not.Operator factors rather than equipment factors were the greatest determinants of first attempt success, highlighting the importance of team selection for neonatal intubations in a high-risk cohort of infants.
引用
收藏
页码:729 / 735
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Impact of VieScope? on first-attempt success during simulated COVID-19 patients intubation: A randomized cross-over simulation trial
    Evrin, Togay
    Sonmez, Leyla Ozturk
    Gadek, Lezsek
    Pruc, Michal
    Navolokina, Alla
    Wieczorek, Wojciech
    Cyran, Maciej
    Smereka, Jacek
    Ozkan, Gul Deniz
    ULUSAL TRAVMA VE ACIL CERRAHI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF TRAUMA & EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2023, 29 (04): : 463 - 470
  • [22] Use of videolaryngoscopy as a teaching tool for novices performing tracheal intubation results in greater first pass success in neonates and infants
    Myatra, Shella Nalnan
    Doctor, Jeson Rajan
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2019, 63 (10) : 781 - 783
  • [23] The use of the Airtraq® optical laryngoscope for routine tracheal intubation in high-risk cardio-surgical patients
    Schälte G.
    Scheid U.
    Rex S.
    Coburn M.
    Fiedler B.
    Rossaint R.
    Zoremba N.
    BMC Research Notes, 4 (1)
  • [24] Bougie approach improves first-attempt success rate compared to stylet approach in patients with difficult airway needing endotracheal intubation: a meta-analysis
    Jiang, Yang
    Wang, Yuan-Yuan
    Qiu, Xiao-Fei
    Shao, Ri-Zhi
    Zhou, Zhen-Feng
    MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2024, 90 (10) : 912 - 921
  • [25] Improving First-Attempt Intubation Success Rate in a Level IV Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Through the Use of a Video Laryngoscope: A Quality Improvement Initiative
    Martinez, Stephanie
    Bhola, Monika
    Minich, Nori Mercuri
    Nauman, Charlene
    Deakins, Kathleen
    Oliverio, Allison
    Yalcinkaya, Gulgun
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2025,
  • [26] Predictive and protective factors for failing first pass intubation in prehospital rapid sequence intubation: an aetiology and risk systematic review with meta-analysis
    Hayes-Bradley, Clare
    McCreery, Michael
    Delorenzo, Ashleigh
    Bendall, Jason
    Lewis, Anthony
    Bowles, Kelly-Ann
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2024, 132 (05) : 918 - 935
  • [27] Predictive risk factors of failed laryngeal mask airway insertion at first attempt
    Wang, Jia
    Shi, Xiaoping
    Xu, Tao
    Wang, Geng
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2018, 46 (05) : 1973 - 1981
  • [28] Mortality Related Risk Factors in High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism in the ICU
    Ergan, Begum
    Ergun, Recai
    Caliskan, Taner
    Aydin, Kutlay
    Tokur, Murat Emre
    Savran, Yusuf
    Koca, Ugur
    Comert, Bilgin
    Gokmen, Necati
    CANADIAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2016, 2016
  • [29] High-Risk Factors for Suppurative Mastitis in Lactating Women
    Yu, Zhonghua
    Sun, Shanping
    Zhang, Yang
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2018, 24 : 4192 - 4197
  • [30] Combined Hybrid Procedure and VAD Insertion in 9 High-Risk Neonates and Infants With HLHS
    Bleiweis, Mark S.
    Philip, Joseph
    Peek, Giles J.
    Fudge, James C.
    Sullivan, Kevin J.
    Co-Vu, Jennifer
    Gupta, Dipankar
    Fricker, Frederick Jay
    Vyas, Himesh V.
    Ebraheem, Mohammed
    Powers, Emma R.
    Falasa, Matheus
    Jacobs, Jeffrey P.
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2022, 114 (03) : 809 - 816