Opportunistic Screening Techniques for Analysis of CT Scans

被引:40
作者
Engelke, Klaus [1 ,2 ]
Chaudry, Oliver [1 ,2 ]
Bartenschlager, Stefan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Univ Hosp Erlangen, Dept Med 3, Ulmenweg 18, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
[2] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen Nurnberg FAU, Inst Med Phys IMP, Henkestr 91, D-91052 Erlangen, Germany
关键词
Computed tomography; Opportunistic screening; Fracture risk; Vertebral fracture assessment; Internal BMD calibration; BONE-MINERAL DENSITY; QUANTITATIVE COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; FINITE-ELEMENT-ANALYSIS; CONTRAST-ENHANCED MDCT; CLINICAL-USE; TRABECULAR ATTENUATION; COMPRESSION FRACTURES; VERTEBRAL FRACTURES; HIP-FRACTURES; LUMBAR SPINE;
D O I
10.1007/s11914-022-00764-5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose of Review Opportunistic screening is a combination of techniques to identify subjects of high risk for osteoporotic fracture using routine clinical CT scans prescribed for diagnoses unrelated to osteoporosis. The two main components are automated detection of vertebral fractures and measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) in CT scans, in which a phantom for calibration of CT to BMD values is not used. This review describes the particular challenges of opportunistic screening and provides an overview and comparison of current techniques used for opportunistic screening. The review further outlines the performance of opportunistic screening. Recent Findings A wide range of technologies for the automatic detection of vertebral fractures have been developed and successfully validated. Most of them are based on artificial intelligence algorithms. The automated differentiation of osteoporotic from traumatic fractures and vertebral deformities unrelated to osteoporosis, the grading of vertebral fracture severity, and the detection of mild vertebral fractures is still problematic. The accuracy of automated fracture detection compared to classical radiological semi-quantitative Genant scoring is about 80%. Accuracy errors of alternative BMD calibration methods compared to simultaneous phantom-based calibration used in standard quantitative CT (QCT) range from below 5% to about 10%. The impact of contrast agents, frequently administered in clinical CT on the determination of BMD and on fracture risk determination is still controversial. Opportunistic screening, the identification of vertebral fracture and the measurement of BMD using clinical routine CT scans, is feasible but corresponding techniques still need to be integrated into the clinical workflow and further validated with respect to the prediction of fracture risk.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 76
页数:12
相关论文
共 102 条
[1]   Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis by routine CT in Southern Europe [J].
Alacreu, Elena ;
Moratal, David ;
Arana, Estanislao .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 28 (03) :983-990
[2]   Correlation between Hounsfield unit derived from head, thorax, abdomen, spine and pelvis CT and t-scores from DXA [J].
Amin, Mohamad Farhan Mohamad ;
Zakaria, Wan Mezlina Wan ;
Yahya, Noorazrul .
SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 50 (12) :2525-2535
[3]   Computational techniques to segment and classify lumbar compression fractures [J].
Arpitha, Adela ;
Rangarajan, Lalitha .
RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2020, 125 (06) :551-560
[4]   The effect of variations in CT scan protocol on femoral finite element failure load assessment using phantomless calibration [J].
Ataei, Ali ;
Eikhout, Jelle ;
van Leeuwen, Ruud G. H. ;
Tanck, Esther ;
Eggermont, Florieke .
PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (03)
[5]   BMD accuracy errors specific to phantomless calibration of CT scans of the lumbar spine [J].
Bartenschlager, Stefan ;
Dankerl, Peter ;
Chaudry, Oliver ;
Uder, Michael ;
Engelke, Klaus .
BONE, 2022, 157
[6]   Volumetric quantitative CT of the spine and hip derived from contrast-enhanced MDCT:: Conversion factors [J].
Bauer, Jan S. ;
Henning, Tobias D. ;
Mueeller, Dirk ;
Lu, Ying ;
Majumdar, Sharmila ;
Link, Thomas M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2007, 188 (05) :1294-1301
[7]   Automatic detection of osteoporotic vertebral fractures in routine thoracic and abdominal MDCT [J].
Baum, Thomas ;
Bauer, Jan S. ;
Klinder, Tobias ;
Dobritz, Martin ;
Rummeny, Ernst J. ;
Noel, Peter B. ;
Lorenz, Cristian .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2014, 24 (04) :872-880
[8]   CT Phantom Evaluation of 67,392 American College of Radiology Accreditation Examinations: Implications for Opportunistic Screening of Osteoporosis Using CT [J].
Boutin, Robert D. ;
Hernandez, Andrew M. ;
Lenchik, Leon ;
Seibert, J. Anthony ;
Gress, Dustin A. ;
Boone, John M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2021, 216 (02) :447-452
[9]   Asynchronously Calibrated Quantitative Bone Densitometry [J].
Brown, J. K. ;
Timm, W. ;
Bodeen, G. ;
Chason, A. ;
Perry, M. ;
Vernacchia, E. ;
DeJournett, R. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2017, 20 (02) :216-225
[10]   Intra and Interobserver Reliability and Agreement of Semiquantitative Vertebral Fracture Assessment on Chest Computed Tomography [J].
Buckens, Constantinus F. ;
de Jong, Pim A. ;
Mol, Christian ;
Bakker, Eric ;
Stallman, Hein P. ;
Mali, Willem P. ;
van der Graaf, Yolanda ;
Verkooijen, Helena M. .
PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (08)