Bureaucracy Meets Digital Reality: The Unfolding of Urban Platforms in European Municipal Governments

被引:10
作者
Lekkas, Charlotte-Katharina [1 ]
Souitaris, Vangelis [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ St Gallen, Inst Technol Management ITEM, St Gallen, Switzerland
[2] City Univ London, Bayes Business Sch, London, England
[3] Univ St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland
[4] City Univ London, Bayes Business Sch, 106 Bunhill Row, London EC1Y 8TZ, England
[5] Univ St Gallen, Bayes Business Sch, St Gallen, Switzerland
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
bureaucracy; change; digital platforms; digitalization; ecosystems; innovation; Max Weber; smart city; technology; VALUE CREATION; SMART CITIES; INNOVATION; ORGANIZATION; STRATEGIES; POWER;
D O I
10.1177/01708406221130857
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The rise of digital technologies provides an opportunity to study smart cities as new organizational forms. We ask whether and how digital platforms and ecosystems affect the bureaucratic governance of municipal governments. To this end, we offer a multiple case analysis based on rich empirical, longitudinal data of seven European smart cities. We find that the contradicting logic of platform governance creates organizational tensions within the bureaucratic municipal government and at the interface between the municipal government and its external partners. We distil a process that describes how these tensions are resolved through a temporary shift to a non-bureaucratic work mode, and the subsequent formalization and institutionalization of those practices as new bureaucratic rules. We make three contributions. First, we contribute to the smart-city literature by outlining an overarching process of how data-driven technologies affect bureaucratic municipal governments. Second, we contribute to the ongoing conversation about the changing nature of Weberian bureaucracy showing how bureaucracy preserves its core while simultaneously adapting to and shaping its environment. Third, we highlight the role of lower-echelon bureaucrats as change agents who devise rules at the intersection of technological and societal development.
引用
收藏
页码:1649 / 1678
页数:30
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]   The Sociological Ambivalence of Bureaucracy: From Weber via Gouldner to Marx [J].
Adler, Paul S. .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2012, 23 (01) :244-266
[2]  
Adler PaulS., 1999, The Academy of Management Executive, V13, P36, DOI DOI 10.5465/AME.1999.2570553
[3]   Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive [J].
Adler, PS ;
Borys, B .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1996, 41 (01) :61-89
[4]  
Adner R, 2006, HARVARD BUS REV, V84, P98
[5]   VALUE CREATION IN INNOVATION ECOSYSTEMS: HOW THE STRUCTURE OF TECHNOLOGICAL INTERDEPENDENCE AFFECTS FIRM PERFORMANCE IN NEW TECHNOLOGY GENERATIONS [J].
Adner, Ron ;
Kapoor, Rahul .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2010, 31 (03) :306-333
[6]   From People to Objects: The digital transformation of fields [J].
Alaimo, Cristina .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2022, 43 (07) :1091-1114
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2008, THE FUTURE OF THE INTERNET AND HOW TO STOP IT
[8]   Understanding Smart Cities: Innovation ecosystems, technological advancements, and societal challenges [J].
Appio, Francesco Paolo ;
Lima, Marcos ;
Paroutis, Sotirios .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2019, 142 :1-14
[9]   Bringing Public Organization and Organizing Back In [J].
Arellano-Gault, David ;
Demortain, David ;
Rouillard, Christian ;
Thoenig, Jean-Claude .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2013, 34 (02) :145-167
[10]   Digital Infrastructures and Urban Governance [J].
Barns, Sarah ;
Cosgrave, Ellie ;
Acuto, Michele ;
Mcneill, Donald .
URBAN POLICY AND RESEARCH, 2017, 35 (01) :20-31